Proofpoint, Inc.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.26T. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MSFT trades at $438.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 421.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ORCL trades at $150.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 276.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PLTR trades at $117.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 510.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 163.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ADBE trades at $383.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 123.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PANW trades at $186.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 105.61. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 101.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CRWD trades at $410.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5132.12. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 74.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FTNT trades at $97.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 74.67B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SNPS trades at $482.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 58.11. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 55.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ADYEY trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 53.85. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 55.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ADYYF trades at $1,752.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 48.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HOOD trades at $54.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 45.99B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NET trades at $132.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -576.13. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 36.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZS trades at $233.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2589.56. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 30.97B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while XYZ trades at $50.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VRSN trades at $281.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GDDY trades at $182.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 24.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while IOT trades at $43.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -154.57. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 24.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BSQKZ trades at $45.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 23.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CRWV trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -22.14. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CRWV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CHKP trades at $218.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 23.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TOST trades at $40.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 1360.67. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.98B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CPAY trades at $327.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NTNX trades at $75.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -288.85. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 19.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while OKTA trades at $119.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 1990.83. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GEN trades at $28.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 17.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CYBR trades at $359.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -168.78. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.12B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KSPI trades at $90.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FFIV trades at $270.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 14.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AFRM trades at $46.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -74.85. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RBRK trades at $76.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 14.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MDB trades at $178.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -103.20. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AKAM trades at $76.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TOITF trades at $127.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 101.91. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SAIL trades at $18.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DOX trades at $91.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WIX trades at $171.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 72.68. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KVYO trades at $33.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -196.41. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 9.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TMICF trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 8.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TMICY trades at $65.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DBX trades at $29.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NEXXY trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.36B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CFLT trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PATH trades at $12.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -96.09. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while INFA trades at $19.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 634.17. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT and NEWR have similar daily volatility (0.05).

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while S trades at $19.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -20.82. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CCCS trades at $9.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 901.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FOUR trades at $85.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SPSC trades at $143.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 67.23. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VRNS trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -55.93. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ACIW trades at $46.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RELY trades at $23.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -125.53. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while QLYS trades at $132.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CLBT trades at $19.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EEFT trades at $108.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BOX trades at $31.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WEX trades at $127.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ODD trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TENB trades at $31.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -82.95. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AVPT trades at $18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -117.94. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while STNE trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AVPTW trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PAGS trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT and SWI have similar daily volatility (0.05).

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CORZ trades at $9.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DOCN trades at $29.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DLO trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CORZZ trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while STWRY trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PAYO trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while APPN trades at $31.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -25.15. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to APPN's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EVTC trades at $35.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BB trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -380.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WWLNF trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while OVHFF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 163.33. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MQ trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 92.14. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TDC trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FIVN trades at $26.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -442.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EVCM trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AVDX trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.03. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CSGS trades at $64.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RAMP trades at $28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -704.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RPD trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RPD's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WRDLY trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NTCT trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GB trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SPNUF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EXOD has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EXOD trades at $50.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXOD's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EXOD's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EXOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PAYA trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TUYA trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 231.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ATEN trades at $17.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CORZW trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DAVA trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is 180.91. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DAVA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MGPPF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.33. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRNT has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VRNT trades at $17.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNT's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PGY trades at $14.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CLBTW has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CLBTW trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBTW's P/E ratio is 93.72. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLBTW's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CLBTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.40M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 965.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PGYWW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 958.71M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BASE trades at $17.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 942.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RDWR trades at $22.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 157.64. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CINT has a market cap of 828.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CINT trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINT's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CINT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CINT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, YEXT has a market cap of 826.67M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while YEXT trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YEXT's P/E ratio is -30.16. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YEXT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to YEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SCWX has a market cap of 756.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SCWX trades at $8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCWX's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SCWX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SCWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TIXT has a market cap of 747.61M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TIXT trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIXT's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TIXT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TIXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CGNT has a market cap of 705.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CGNT trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNT's P/E ratio is -57.65. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CGNT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 686.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WRD trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, OSPN has a market cap of 603.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while OSPN trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSPN's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OSPN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to OSPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, IIIV has a market cap of 601.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while IIIV trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIIV's P/E ratio is -150.94. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IIIV's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to IIIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 558.68M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 551.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GCT trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PRTH has a market cap of 546.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PRTH trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTH's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PRTH's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PRTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, LLNW has a market cap of 545.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while LLNW trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLNW's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LLNW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to LLNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 529.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RZLV has a market cap of 494.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RZLV trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZLV's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RZLV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RZLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 456.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FNCHF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 445.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DYNDF trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CCSI has a market cap of 439.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CCSI trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCSI's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CCSI's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CCSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.25M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 415.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HISNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 406.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while YHEKF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 390.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BAND trades at $14.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -58.62. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ATGL has a market cap of 370.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ATGL trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATGL's P/E ratio is -303.75. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATGL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ATGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 368.73M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SANP trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NFONF trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, QIWI has a market cap of 355.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while QIWI trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QIWI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to QIWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to QIWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, LVOX has a market cap of 352.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while LVOX trades at $3.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVOX's P/E ratio is -13.81. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LVOX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to LVOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RPAY has a market cap of 351.53M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RPAY trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPAY's P/E ratio is -35.82. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RPAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 348.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SPMYY trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 107.78. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, LSAK has a market cap of 339.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while LSAK trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSAK's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LSAK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to LSAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, LVOXU has a market cap of 336.68M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while LVOXU trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVOXU's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LVOXU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to LVOXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KLTR has a market cap of 335.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KLTR trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLTR's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KLTR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to KLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, IMXI has a market cap of 333.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while IMXI trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMXI's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IMXI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to IMXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GRRR has a market cap of 326.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GRRR trades at $16.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRRR's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRRR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GRRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GRRRW has a market cap of 305.14M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GRRRW trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRRRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRRRW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GRRRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 304.92M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 297.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RXT trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, UEPS has a market cap of 287.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while UEPS trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPS's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UEPS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to UEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BLZE has a market cap of 286.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BLZE trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLZE's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLZE's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BLZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 283.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TYPMF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 260.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SERKF trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -30.57. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYOW has a market cap of 255.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PAYOW trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PAYOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PAYOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALLT has a market cap of 251.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ALLT trades at $6.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLT's P/E ratio is -42.27. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALLT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ALLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FFPP trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 246.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FMZNF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PDYNW has a market cap of 240.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PDYNW trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PDYNW's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PDYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ABANF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PDYN has a market cap of 221.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PDYN trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDYN's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PDYN's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ARQQW has a market cap of 203.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ARQQW trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARQQW's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARQQW's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ARQQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ARQQ has a market cap of 201.91M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ARQQ trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARQQ's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARQQ's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ARQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SANG has a market cap of 198.21M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SANG trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANG's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SANG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 188.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TCX has a market cap of 187.70M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TCX trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TCX's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HPAI has a market cap of 181.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HPAI trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPAI's P/E ratio is 81.44. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HPAI's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to HPAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.66M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, JNVR has a market cap of 157.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while JNVR trades at $79.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNVR's P/E ratio is -40.67. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JNVR's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to JNVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 154.59M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ARBE trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZFOXW has a market cap of 150.52M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZFOXW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFOXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZFOXW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ZFOXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ARBEW has a market cap of 149.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ARBEW trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBEW's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARBEW's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ARBEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYS has a market cap of 147.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PAYS trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYS's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PAYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZFOX has a market cap of 142.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZFOX trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFOX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZFOX's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ZFOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AISP has a market cap of 125.47M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AISP trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AISP's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AISP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AISP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AISPW has a market cap of 116.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AISPW trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AISPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AISPW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AISPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, REKR has a market cap of 113.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while REKR trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REKR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to REKR's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to REKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 108.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ERDLF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.81M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 100.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MCRP trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MCRP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FATN has a market cap of 97.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FATN trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATN's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FATN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FATN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 96.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BGOPF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SNCR has a market cap of 93.94M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SNCR trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCR's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SNCR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SNCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 89.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HAIVF trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, STEM has a market cap of 88.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while STEM trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STEM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STEM's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to STEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZENV has a market cap of 86.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZENV trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZENV's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZENV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ZENV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, UBXG has a market cap of 84.38M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while UBXG trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBXG's P/E ratio is -25.37. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UBXG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to UBXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VERI has a market cap of 81.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VERI trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERI's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VERI's ROE of +50.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 77.00M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CORZR trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AUID has a market cap of 71.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AUID trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUID's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AUID's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AUID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BKKT-WT has a market cap of 69.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BKKT-WT trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKKT-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BKKT-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BKKT-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 68.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VRSSF trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BKKT has a market cap of 66.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BKKT trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKKT's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BKKT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BKKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AILE has a market cap of 59.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AILE trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AILE's ROE of -82.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CROTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 55.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WHEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DGXX has a market cap of 54.46M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DGXX trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGXX's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DGXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DGXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, JG has a market cap of 53.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while JG trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JG's P/E ratio is -52.24. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to JG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 53.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZENA trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 50.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DGGXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 50.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SKKY trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MLGO has a market cap of 46.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MLGO trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLGO's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MLGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while QBITF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GBOX has a market cap of 44.61M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GBOX trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBOX's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GBOX's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GBOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, XBP has a market cap of 43.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while XBP trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBP's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XBP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to XBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 42.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NOWVF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -49.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 40.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while JGHG trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while APGT trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to APGT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MRDB has a market cap of 37.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MRDB trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRDB's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MRDB's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VHC has a market cap of 35.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VHC trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHC's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VHC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 35.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CLOQ trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 33.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KPLT has a market cap of 30.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KPLT trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPLT's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KPLT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to KPLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, INTZ has a market cap of 28.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while INTZ trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTZ's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to INTZ's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to INTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MSAIW has a market cap of 27.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MSAIW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSAIW's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to MSAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MSAI has a market cap of 27.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MSAI trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSAI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSAI's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VRAR has a market cap of 23.99M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VRAR trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRAR's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VRAR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VRAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MOGO has a market cap of 23.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MOGO trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOGO's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MOGO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BLIN has a market cap of 22.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BLIN trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLIN's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLIN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 21.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TFLM trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while POTTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HUBC has a market cap of 19.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HUBC trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HUBC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to HUBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HUBCW has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HUBCW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HUBCW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to HUBCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SOS has a market cap of 17.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SOS trades at $5.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOS's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CISO has a market cap of 16.62M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CISO trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CISO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CISO's ROE of -4.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CISO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DTSS has a market cap of 15.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DTSS trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSS's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DTSS's ROE of -6.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DTSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 15.02M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CLPMF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BNAI has a market cap of 13.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BNAI trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNAI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BNAI's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BNAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BNAIW has a market cap of 13.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BNAIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BNAIW's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BNAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PLCKF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FAAS has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FAAS trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAAS's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FAAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 10.84M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SDCH trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HPAIW has a market cap of 9.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HPAIW trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HPAIW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to HPAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, APCX has a market cap of 8.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while APCX trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APCX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to APCX's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to APCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, APCXW has a market cap of 8.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while APCXW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APCXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to APCXW's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to APCXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RVYL has a market cap of 6.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RVYL trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVYL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RVYL's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RVYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.90M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 6.64M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EGIO has a market cap of 6.50M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EGIO trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EGIO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EGIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.79M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WEJO has a market cap of 4.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WEJO trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEJO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WEJO's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to WEJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WEJOW has a market cap of 4.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WEJOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEJOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WEJOW's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WEJOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RKNEF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ALAR trades at $6.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NBVAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 4.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RIHT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 4.28M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FOBIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 4.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TGCB trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.88M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VENZF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KCRD trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MODGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CETX has a market cap of 2.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CETX trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CETX's ROE of -17.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CETX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MARK has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MARK trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MARK's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BCAN has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BCAN trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BCAN's ROE of -4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to BCAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GIGGW has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GIGGW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIGGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GIGGW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to GIGGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AILEW has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AILEW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AILEW's ROE of -82.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TAOP has a market cap of 2.19M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TAOP trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAOP's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TAOP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TAOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ATCHW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 1.87M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ATCH trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, XBPEW has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while XBPEW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBPEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XBPEW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to XBPEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CYRN has a market cap of 1.75M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CYRN trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CYRN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while VISM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 781864.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TONR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 780263.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771006.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while INOTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769327.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while INAR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to INAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683114.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 574783.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SMKG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 563143.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ITNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZVLO has a market cap of 532909.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZVLO trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZVLO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZVLO's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ZVLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZRFY has a market cap of 467563.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZRFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZRFY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZRFY's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ZRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, AMPDF has a market cap of 454197.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while AMPDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPDF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMPDF's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to AMPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 408888.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MKTDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +220.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MKTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FFZY has a market cap of 404220.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FFZY trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFZY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FFZY's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FFZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SMME has a market cap of 345516.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SMME trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SMME's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SMME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZPTA has a market cap of 344630.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZPTA trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZPTA's ROE of -5.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ZPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CETXP has a market cap of 228041.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CETXP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETXP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CETXP's ROE of -17.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CETXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DCLT has a market cap of 141749.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DCLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DCLT's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DCLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, IRNT has a market cap of 134130.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while IRNT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRNT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IRNT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to IRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TMNA has a market cap of 122752.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TMNA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMNA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TMNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KSIH has a market cap of 83454.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KSIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KSIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to KSIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CMFV has a market cap of 74557.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CMFV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMFV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMFV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CMFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, HUBCZ has a market cap of 69184.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while HUBCZ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HUBCZ's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to HUBCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, STTTF has a market cap of 55338.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while STTTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STTTF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to STTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SEII has a market cap of 42988.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SEII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SEII's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SEII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ATDS has a market cap of 33276.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ATDS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ATDS's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ATDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KPLTW has a market cap of 23024.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KPLTW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KPLTW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to KPLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PLYZ has a market cap of 11907.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PLYZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLYZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PLYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZPAS has a market cap of 11098.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZPAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZPAS's ROE of +10.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ZPAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WEJOF has a market cap of 10990.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WEJOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEJOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WEJOF's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to WEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 10651.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SOLS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +17.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, LGSLF has a market cap of 9929.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while LGSLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGSLF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LGSLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to LGSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DEMO has a market cap of 8618.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DEMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DEMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to DEMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, WMDH has a market cap of 6535.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while WMDH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMDH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WMDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to WMDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CGLO has a market cap of 5092.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CGLO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CGLO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CYBF has a market cap of 3517.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CYBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CYBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALFIQ has a market cap of 1609.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ALFIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALFIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ALFIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CYRNQ has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CYRNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CYRNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to CYRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ISOL has a market cap of 661.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ISOL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISOL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ISOL's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ISOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, NXTP has a market cap of 597.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while NXTP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NXTP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to NXTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, GAWK has a market cap of 507.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while GAWK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GAWK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to GAWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MOMT has a market cap of 398.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MOMT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MOMT's ROE of -3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to MOMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TLVLF has a market cap of 89.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TLVLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLVLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TLVLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to TLVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, BLGI has a market cap of 29.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while BLGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLGI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLGI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to BLGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALFWQ has a market cap of 16.00. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ALFWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALFWQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to ALFWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FSRDW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FSRDW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSRDW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FSRDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TLND comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TLND trades at $65.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TLND's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MIME comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MIME trades at $79.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MIME's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MFGP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MFGP trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MFGP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MFGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, SFET comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while SFET trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SFET's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to SFET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MCFE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MCFE trades at $25.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MCFE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MCFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, DFDV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while DFDV trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DFDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PFPT has daily volatility of 0.05 and DFDV has daily volatility of N/A.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TAALF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TAALF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAALF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TAALF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TAALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EPAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EPAY trades at $56.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAY's P/E ratio is -113.53. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EPAY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to EPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MNDT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MNDT trades at $22.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDT's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MNDT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MSP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MSP trades at $35.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSP's P/E ratio is 130.30. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to MSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, LYLT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while LYLT trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYLT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LYLT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to LYLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZIXI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ZIXI trades at $8.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIXI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ZIXI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ZIXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, EXLGF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while EXLGF trades at $20.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXLGF's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EXLGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to EXLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FEYE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FEYE trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEYE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FEYE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FEYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, KNBE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while KNBE trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KNBE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to KNBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FSRWQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FSRWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSRWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to FSRWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, IMCIW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while IMCIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMCIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IMCIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PFPT has daily volatility of 0.05 and IMCIW has daily volatility of N/A.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, TUFN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while TUFN trades at $12.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TUFN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to TUFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, MCFUF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while MCFUF trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCFUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MCFUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to MCFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALFIW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while ALFIW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ALFIW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to ALFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, FSRD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while FSRD trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FSRD's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to FSRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, PING comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while PING trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PING's P/E ratio is -34.38. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PING's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is less volatile compared to PING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.

PFPT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFPT stands at N/A. In comparison, CCYNF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, PFPT is priced at $175.90, while CCYNF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFPT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCYNF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PFPT's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CCYNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFPT is more volatile compared to CCYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFPT.