ParaFin Corporation

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while WOPEF trades at $17.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while RGRLF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while TRMLF trades at $48.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PEXNY trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while IPXHY trades at $14.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while DETNF trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while IPXHF trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while STOSF trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SSLZY trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while AETUF trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SPGYF trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, WLLBW has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while WLLBW trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WLLBW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to WLLBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PTRRY trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while DKDRF trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while MEGEF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PREKF trades at $17.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while HBRIY trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PMOIF trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while DELKY trades at $19.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while DLKGF trades at $196.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while OASPW trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PEYUF trades at $14.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PRMRF trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while NUVSF trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ATHOF trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while EERGF trades at $11.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while BEPTF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while IPCFF trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while JPTXF trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while MEYYY trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while FRHLF trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while BIREF trades at $5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while AAVVF trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -71.15. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while CDDRF trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while DTNOF trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while KELTF trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PARXF trades at $11.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PQEFF has a market cap of 985.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PQEFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PQEFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PQEFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PQEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 984.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while KRNGF trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while AOIFF trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 884.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SQZZF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 842.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while CRLFF trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 633.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while KWTEF trades at $14.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 569.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while DALXF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 489.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while GUKYF trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 75.20. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ZPTAF trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PTALF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 444.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while RCKHF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 420.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PTHRF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -36.82. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 396.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while TUWLF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while FECCF trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ATUUF trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -42.79. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while COPJF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while KRNGY trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 358M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SHASF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ENQUF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 335.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while CEIEF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -31.59. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while OILSF trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 299.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while TUWOY trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PESAF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while EXCE trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while IPOOF trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while GEGYF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ZNOG trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SEUSF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -16.69. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while ALVOF trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while EEGUF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PIFYF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while RECWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while GASXF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while RUBLF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.

PFNO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PFNO stands at 153.6K. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, PFNO is priced at $0.00, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PFNO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, PFNO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFNO is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFNO.