Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund
Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund PFIA.TO Peers
See (PFIA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFIA.TO | CA$10.09 | -0.20% | 1.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.97% |
| BNC.TO | CA$28.51 | -0.35% | 8.6B | 14.04 | CA$2.03 | +8.94% |
| EIT-UN.TO | CA$15.56 | -0.13% | 2.8B | 21.03 | CA$0.74 | +8.10% |
| NUBF.TO | CA$21.29 | +0.09% | 2.4B | 14.67 | CA$1.45 | +4.17% |
| NREA.TO | CA$23.80 | -0.87% | 1.3B | 20.81 | CA$1.14 | +1.86% |
| AD-UN.TO | CA$18.72 | -0.53% | 851.6M | 4.66 | CA$4.02 | +7.27% |
| MKB.TO | CA$19.06 | -0.21% | 807.4M | N/A | N/A | +3.76% |
| FIE.TO | CA$8.51 | -0.58% | 806.7M | 13.54 | CA$0.63 | +5.63% |
| HDIF.TO | CA$8.24 | -1.20% | 402.3M | 19.50 | CA$0.42 | +10.76% |
| XTR.TO | CA$11.28 | -0.27% | 350.8M | 19.06 | CA$0.59 | +4.26% |
Stock Comparison
PFIA.TO vs BNC.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNC.TO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while BNC.TO trades at CA$28.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to BNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs EIT-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EIT-UN.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while EIT-UN.TO trades at CA$15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EIT-UN.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to EIT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs NUBF.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NUBF.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while NUBF.TO trades at CA$21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUBF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUBF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to NUBF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs NREA.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NREA.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while NREA.TO trades at CA$23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREA.TO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NREA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to NREA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs AD-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AD-UN.TO has a market cap of 851.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while AD-UN.TO trades at CA$18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AD-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AD-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to AD-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs MKB.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MKB.TO has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while MKB.TO trades at CA$19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MKB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to MKB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs FIE.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FIE.TO has a market cap of 806.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while FIE.TO trades at CA$8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to FIE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HDIF.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HDIF.TO has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HDIF.TO trades at CA$8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIF.TO's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HDIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs XTR.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XTR.TO has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while XTR.TO trades at CA$11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTR.TO's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to XTR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs CIC.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIC.TO has a market cap of 242.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while CIC.TO trades at CA$12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIC.TO's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to CIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs VCIP.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VCIP.TO has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while VCIP.TO trades at CA$26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCIP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to VCIP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs IFRF.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IFRF.TO has a market cap of 198.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while IFRF.TO trades at CA$7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFRF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFRF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to IFRF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs CCOR.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCOR.TO has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while CCOR.TO trades at CA$17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to CCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs ZMI.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZMI.TO has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while ZMI.TO trades at CA$17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to ZMI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PBY-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PBY-UN.TO has a market cap of 145.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PBY-UN.TO trades at CA$15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBY-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBY-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to PBY-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs MGB.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MGB.TO has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while MGB.TO trades at CA$15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to MGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HUBL.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUBL.TO has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HUBL.TO trades at CA$12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBL.TO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HUBL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs FAP.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FAP.TO has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while FAP.TO trades at CA$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAP.TO's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to FAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PLDI.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PLDI.TO has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PLDI.TO trades at CA$18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to PLDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PIC-A.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PIC-A.TO has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PIC-A.TO trades at CA$5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIC-A.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIC-A.TO's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to PIC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs BMAX.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BMAX.TO has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while BMAX.TO trades at CA$13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to BMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs BGI-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while BGI-UN.TO trades at CA$5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to BGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs TLF.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TLF.TO has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while TLF.TO trades at CA$24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLF.TO's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TLF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to TLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs FFI-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FFI-UN.TO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while FFI-UN.TO trades at CA$12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to FFI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs XINC.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XINC.TO has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while XINC.TO trades at CA$20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XINC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to XINC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs MID-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MID-UN.TO has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while MID-UN.TO trades at CA$7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MID-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID-UN.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to MID-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HTAE.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HTAE.TO has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HTAE.TO trades at CA$15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTAE.TO's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTAE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HTAE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs RBN-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RBN-UN.TO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while RBN-UN.TO trades at CA$8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBN-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBN-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to RBN-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs XSC.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XSC.TO has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while XSC.TO trades at CA$17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to XSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HGR.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HGR.TO has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HGR.TO trades at CA$5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HHLE.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HHLE.TO has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HHLE.TO trades at CA$8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHLE.TO's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HHLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs XSI.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XSI.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while XSI.TO trades at CA$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to XSI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs SKG-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKG-UN.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while SKG-UN.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SKG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to SKG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs FCGI.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCGI.TO has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while FCGI.TO trades at CA$14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to FCGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs RIFI.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RIFI.TO has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while RIFI.TO trades at CA$17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIFI.TO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIFI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to RIFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs INC-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INC-UN.TO has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while INC-UN.TO trades at CA$8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INC-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INC-UN.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to INC-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs EARN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EARN.TO has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while EARN.TO trades at CA$48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EARN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EARN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to EARN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PIN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PIN.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PIN.TO trades at CA$18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to PIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PHR.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PHR.TO has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PHR.TO trades at CA$19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHR.TO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to PHR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs ZWQT.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZWQT.TO has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while ZWQT.TO trades at CA$16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWQT.TO's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to ZWQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs ETP.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ETP.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while ETP.TO trades at CA$17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to ETP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs FGX.NE Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FGX.NE has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while FGX.NE trades at CA$4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGX.NE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGX.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to FGX.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs REIT.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, REIT.TO has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while REIT.TO trades at CA$20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REIT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REIT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to REIT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs BSO-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BSO-UN.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while BSO-UN.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSO-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSO-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to BSO-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs CIQ-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CIQ-UN.TO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while CIQ-UN.TO trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIQ-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIQ-UN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to CIQ-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs TPAY.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TPAY.TO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while TPAY.TO trades at CA$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPAY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPAY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to TPAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs FCMI.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCMI.TO has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while FCMI.TO trades at CA$13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCMI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCMI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to FCMI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs CES.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CES.TO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while CES.TO trades at CA$24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CES.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CES.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to CES.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs ENI-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ENI-UN.TO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while ENI-UN.TO trades at CA$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENI-UN.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to ENI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HID.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HID.TO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HID.TO trades at CA$21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HID.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HID.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HID.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HBFE.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HBFE.TO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HBFE.TO trades at CA$10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBFE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HBFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs BLB-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BLB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while BLB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to BLB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PGI-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PGI-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PGI-UN.TO trades at CA$7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGI-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGI-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to PGI-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs GDG-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GDG-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while GDG-UN.TO trades at CA$13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDG-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to GDG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs HBL-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HBL-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while HBL-UN.TO trades at CA$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBL-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBL-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is less volatile compared to HBL-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs IGLB.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IGLB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while IGLB.TO trades at CA$10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to IGLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs PMB-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PMB-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while PMB-UN.TO trades at CA$7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMB-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMB-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to PMB-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.
PFIA.TO vs BUA-UN.TO Comparison
PFIA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFIA.TO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BUA-UN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFIA.TO is priced at CA$10.09, while BUA-UN.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFIA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUA-UN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFIA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BUA-UN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFIA.TO is more volatile compared to BUA-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFIA.TO.