Flutter Entertainment plc
Flutter Entertainment plc PDYPY Peers
See (PDYPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDYPY | $103.75 | +0.50% | 36.7B | -494.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPF | $205.00 | +1.99% | 36.3B | -476.74 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| ARLUF | $37.25 | -5.82% | 23.3B | 32.68 | $1.14 | +0.96% |
| GXYYY | $21.14 | -1.67% | 18.5B | 16.52 | $1.28 | +0.39% |
| GXYEF | $3.80 | +5.56% | 16.6B | 14.62 | $0.26 | +0.43% |
| SCHYY | $19.50 | +0.26% | 15.8B | 15.12 | $1.29 | +1.40% |
| SCHYF | $1.80 | N/A | 14.6B | 13.85 | $0.13 | +13.89% |
| EVVTY | $68.49 | +0.93% | 14B | 10.24 | $6.69 | +4.24% |
| EVGGF | $68.45 | -3.25% | 13.5B | 10.19 | $6.72 | +4.57% |
| GRKZF | $23.35 | N/A | 8.4B | 15.36 | $1.52 | +6.87% |
Stock Comparison
PDYPY vs PDYPF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ARLUF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ARLUF trades at $37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to ARLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GXYYY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GXYYY trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GXYEF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GXYEF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GXYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SCHYY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SCHYY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to SCHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SCHYF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SCHYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to SCHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EVVTY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EVVTY trades at $68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EVGGF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EVGGF trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GRKZF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GRKZF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GRKZF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GRKZF's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRKZF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GRKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GOFPY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GOFPY trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs LTRCF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while LTRCF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to LTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GIGNF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GIGNF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GIGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GMVHF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GMVHF trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GMVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GIGNY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GIGNY trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GIGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GMVHY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GMVHY trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs LFDJF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while LFDJF trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to LFDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs MCHVF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while MCHVF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to MCHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PYTCY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PYTCY trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 55.81. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to PYTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs WYNMF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while WYNMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to WYNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs WYNMY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while WYNMY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to WYNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SKXJF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SKXJF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to SKXJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BMRMF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BMRMF trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to BMRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GEBHY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GEBHY trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GEBEY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to GEBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs KNDGF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to KNDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GMALF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GMALF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GMALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GMALY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GMALY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GMALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GEBHF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GEBHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GEBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SJMHF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SJMHF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to SJMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs NGCRY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while NGCRY trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to NGCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs NGCRF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while NGCRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to NGCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SJMHY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SJMHY trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -37.67. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to SJMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BVHBB Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to BVHBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PYTCF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PYTCF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to PYTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs TACBY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while TACBY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TACBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to TACBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs MDEVY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 971.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while MDEVY trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to MDEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs TABCF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 937.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while TABCF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to TABCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs MDEVF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 900.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while MDEVF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to MDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BJSAF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to BJSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs IRLTY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to IRLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs IRLTF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to IRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BYNEF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BYNEF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to BYNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BLBRF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BLBRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to BLBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs MCHVY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 500.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while MCHVY trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to MCHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs RANKF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while RANKF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to RANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SKYZF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SKYZF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to SKYZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs LUKEF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 423.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to LUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PBKOF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PBKOF trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to PBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EHGRF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EHGRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to EHGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs KMBIF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, KMBIF has a market cap of 345.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while KMBIF trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas KMBIF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KMBIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to KMBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs AGTEF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while AGTEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to AGTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PBTHF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PBTHF has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PBTHF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PBTHF's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PBTHF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to PBTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EIHDF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EIHDF has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EIHDF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EIHDF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EIHDF's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to EIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs AINSF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while AINSF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GHIFF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GHIFF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GHIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs MALDF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while MALDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MALDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to MALDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PSDMF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PSDMF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to PSDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PMKRF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to PMKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs PDSSF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while PDSSF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to PDSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs RCTUF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to RCTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ARHN Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ARHN has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ARHN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ARHN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARHN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to ARHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GLXZ Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GLXZ trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -14.65. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs CTTMF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to CTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs TBTC Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while TBTC trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to TBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BRRE Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BRRE trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -780.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to BRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs JKPTF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to JKPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs JPOTF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while JPOTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs TNTAF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SPOZF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to SPOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs NWGIW Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to NWGIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs CETMF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while CETMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to CETMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs RYWCF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to RYWCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs RVLCF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while RVLCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to RVLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs LTFD Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while LTFD trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to LTFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ITMZF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs THRSF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while THRSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs FCNE Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, FCNE has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while FCNE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas FCNE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FCNE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to FCNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs BRVO Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while BRVO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to BRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GMER Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GMER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMER's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GMER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ELRA Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ELRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to ELRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs RVRVF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 813.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while RVRVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to RVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs SWCC Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 758.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while SWCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to SWCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs WNRS Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 211.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while WNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to WNRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs WPFH Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 152.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while WPFH trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs FUNFF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 143.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs VETIF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 101.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while VETIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +9.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to VETIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EXPH Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EXPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to EXPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EMBR Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 32.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EMBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to EMBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs EPGG Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while EPGG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to EPGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs NTGL Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while NTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to NTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ELYS Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ELYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to ELYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs CGAM Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while CGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to CGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs KNBA Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while KNBA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is less volatile compared to KNBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ULSP Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ULSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to ULSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs ROBK Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while ROBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to ROBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs LTTGF Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to LTTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs AMRA Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 32. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while AMRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to AMRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs CWLDY Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, CWLDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while CWLDY trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas CWLDY's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CWLDY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to CWLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.
PDYPY vs GIGI Comparison
PDYPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDYPY stands at 36.7B. In comparison, GIGI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDYPY is priced at $103.75, while GIGI trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDYPY currently has a P/E ratio of -494.05, whereas GIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDYPY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GIGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDYPY is more volatile compared to GIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDYPY.