Performance Drink Group, Inc.
Performance Drink Group, Inc. PDPG Peers
See (PDPG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDPG | $0.01 | N/A | 18.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NNFSF | $4.84 | N/A | 54.4B | 32.27 | $0.15 | +2.18% |
| CCHGY | $52.75 | +0.55% | 19.2B | 20.68 | $2.55 | +2.12% |
| EMBVF | $10.82 | -2.30% | 18.6B | 16.14 | $0.67 | +1.19% |
| CCHBF | $36.50 | N/A | 13.3B | 14.31 | $2.55 | +3.01% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | N/A | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.76% |
| YKLTY | $10.09 | +13.50% | 6B | 19.40 | $0.52 | +0.74% |
| YKLTF | $19.97 | -1.72% | 6B | 19.20 | $1.04 | +1.13% |
| COCSF | $9.30 | -2.87% | 5.2B | 16.03 | $0.58 | +3.59% |
| UPCHY | $114.80 | N/A | 5B | 19.29 | $5.95 | +37.03% |
Stock Comparison
PDPG vs NNFSF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while NNFSF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs CCHGY Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while CCHGY trades at $52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs EMBVF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while EMBVF trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs CCHBF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while CCHBF trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs BTVCY Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs YKLTY Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while YKLTY trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs YKLTF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while YKLTF trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs COCSF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while COCSF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs UPCHY Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while UPCHY trades at $114.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs BTVCF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs UNPSF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs ITONF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while ITONF trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs CCOJY Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while CCOJY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 123.86. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs CCOJF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while CCOJF trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 69.05. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs ITOEF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs AQPW Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while AQPW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs OSOPF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs FQVTF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while FQVTF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 41.07. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs YNAJF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while YNAJF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs LSDAF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while LSDAF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs BAGFF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 778.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while BAGFF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs NJMVF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs HAATF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while HAATF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs CHFHY Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while CHFHY trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs JSDA Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while JSDA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs MOJO Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while MOJO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs KRTL Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while KRTL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs APRU Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs RVBR Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while RVBR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs DRNK Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs FLWBF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while FLWBF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs HIRU Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs NTEI Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while NTEI trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs HSEEF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while HSEEF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs PLVFF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs INKW Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs PURT Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs RMHB Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs FBEC Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs ASII Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 796K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs NBVG Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 768.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs MCHA Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 409.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while MCHA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is less volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs VGID Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs KGKG Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs FMBV Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 226.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs HFBG Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 223.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs STZU Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 206.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs FHBC Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs DNAX Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs GHMP Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs MLHC Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs DNDT Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 119.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while DNDT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs EQLB Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 85.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs KRED Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs FGFT Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs BGEM Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs BVNNF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs PPBV Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs HKBV Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs ALKM Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs TBEV Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs SWRI Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs AQUI Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 594. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while AQUI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs BBDA Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs ABVG Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs CLCL Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs RMIL Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.
PDPG vs GGGRF Comparison
PDPG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDPG stands at 18.8M. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDPG is priced at $0.01, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDPG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDPG's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDPG is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDPG.