Petra Diamonds Limited
Petra Diamonds Limited (PDL.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PDL.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDL.L | £12.95 | +4.02% | 25.1M | -0.24 | -£0.53 | N/A |
FRES.L | £1,430.00 | +0.07% | 10.5B | 102.14 | £0.14 | +1.38% |
POLY.L | £215.00 | +30.30% | 1B | -4.48 | -£0.48 | N/A |
THS.L | £92.00 | -0.65% | 271.6M | 7.08 | £0.13 | +3.79% |
SLP.L | £72.50 | -2.03% | 188.6M | 24.17 | £0.03 | +2.41% |
EEE.L | £25.50 | +0.00% | 176.1M | -25.50 | -£0.01 | N/A |
EUA.L | £4.35 | -3.33% | 128.4M | -4.35 | -£0.01 | N/A |
GMET.L | £59.50 | +2.59% | 94.6M | -59.50 | -£0.01 | N/A |
GEM.L | £5.38 | +0.94% | 92.7M | -1.07 | -£0.05 | N/A |
HEX.L | £24.50 | -2.00% | 45.6M | -24.50 | -£0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PDL.L vs FRES.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while FRES.L trades at £1,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 102.14. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check FRES.L's competition here
PDL.L vs POLY.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while POLY.L trades at £215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PDL.L has daily volatility of 11.38 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check POLY.L's competition here
PDL.L vs THS.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while THS.L trades at £92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check THS.L's competition here
PDL.L vs SLP.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while SLP.L trades at £72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check SLP.L's competition here
PDL.L vs EEE.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while EEE.L trades at £25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check EEE.L's competition here
PDL.L vs EUA.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while EUA.L trades at £4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check EUA.L's competition here
PDL.L vs GMET.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while GMET.L trades at £59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -59.50. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check GMET.L's competition here
PDL.L vs GEM.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while GEM.L trades at £5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check GEM.L's competition here
PDL.L vs HEX.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while HEX.L trades at £24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check HEX.L's competition here
PDL.L vs 0V7B.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while 0V7B.L trades at £0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check 0V7B.L's competition here
PDL.L vs COBR.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while COBR.L trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check COBR.L's competition here
PDL.L vs 0V6Y.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while 0V6Y.L trades at £0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check 0V6Y.L's competition here
PDL.L vs 0A4V.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while 0A4V.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check 0A4V.L's competition here
PDL.L vs UFO.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while UFO.L trades at £0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check UFO.L's competition here
PDL.L vs GEMD.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while GEMD.L trades at £6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check GEMD.L's competition here
PDL.L vs FME.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while FME.L trades at £0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check FME.L's competition here
PDL.L vs ROCK.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while ROCK.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check ROCK.L's competition here
PDL.L vs BOD.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while BOD.L trades at £0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check BOD.L's competition here
PDL.L vs FMET.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while FMET.L trades at £3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check FMET.L's competition here
PDL.L vs URAH.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while URAH.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check URAH.L's competition here
PDL.L vs SEFA.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while SEFA.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check SEFA.L's competition here
PDL.L vs CMRS.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while CMRS.L trades at £1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check CMRS.L's competition here
PDL.L vs KDR.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while KDR.L trades at £0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is less volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check KDR.L's competition here
PDL.L vs BRD.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while BRD.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PDL.L has daily volatility of 11.38 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check BRD.L's competition here
PDL.L vs GEMR.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, GEMR.L has a market cap of 694.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while GEMR.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to GEMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check GEMR.L's competition here
PDL.L vs NTVO.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 452.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while NTVO.L trades at £0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check NTVO.L's competition here
PDL.L vs PERE.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while PERE.L trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check PERE.L's competition here
PDL.L vs DNK.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, DNK.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while DNK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check DNK.L's competition here
PDL.L vs GPSS.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, GPSS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while GPSS.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check GPSS.L's competition here
PDL.L vs 0UH1.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, 0UH1.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while 0UH1.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check 0UH1.L's competition here
PDL.L vs ALS.L Comparison July 2025
PDL.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDL.L stands at 25.1M. In comparison, ALS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PDL.L is priced at £12.95, while ALS.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDL.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ALS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PDL.L's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALS.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PDL.L is more volatile compared to ALS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDL.L.Check ALS.L's competition here