Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited
Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited (PCDVF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PCDVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCDVF | $0.26 | +0.00% | 688.1M | -26.00 | -$0.01 | +26.22% |
| BKAMF | $14.33 | +0.00% | 111.7B | N/A | N/A | +9.13% |
| BKFAF | $7.01 | +0.00% | 111B | N/A | N/A | +10.53% |
| BAMKF | $12.50 | +0.00% | 111B | 5.11 | $2.45 | +5.52% |
| BXDIF | $8.42 | +0.00% | 111B | N/A | N/A | +8.76% |
| BROXF | $14.77 | +0.00% | 111B | N/A | N/A | +5.95% |
| BAMGF | $13.60 | +0.00% | 111B | 5.56 | $2.45 | +4.27% |
| BKFPF | $11.34 | +0.00% | 108.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.19% |
| IVSXF | $30.20 | +0.00% | 92.6B | 37.75 | $0.80 | +1.65% |
| IVSBF | $30.00 | -0.99% | 91.9B | 37.50 | $0.80 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
PCDVF vs BKAMF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BKAMF has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BKAMF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BKAMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKAMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BKAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKAMF's competition here
PCDVF vs BKFAF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BKFAF has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BKFAF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BKFAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to BKFAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check BKFAF's competition here
PCDVF vs BAMKF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BAMKF has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BAMKF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BAMKF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BAMKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BAMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMKF's competition here
PCDVF vs BXDIF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BXDIF has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BXDIF trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BXDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BXDIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to BXDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check BXDIF's competition here
PCDVF vs BROXF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BROXF has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BROXF trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BROXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BROXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to BROXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check BROXF's competition here
PCDVF vs BAMGF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BAMGF has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BAMGF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BAMGF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BAMGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to BAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check BAMGF's competition here
PCDVF vs BKFPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BKFPF has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BKFPF trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BKFPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKFPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BKFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFPF's competition here
PCDVF vs IVSXF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IVSXF has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IVSXF trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IVSXF's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVSXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IVSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IVSXF's competition here
PCDVF vs IVSBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IVSBF has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IVSBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IVSBF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVSBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IVSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IVSBF's competition here
PCDVF vs TGOPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TGOPF has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TGOPF trades at $56.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TGOPF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TGOPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to TGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check TGOPF's competition here
PCDVF vs TGOPY Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TGOPY has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TGOPY trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TGOPY's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TGOPY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to TGOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check TGOPY's competition here
PCDVF vs VNGDF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, VNGDF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while VNGDF trades at $120.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas VNGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VNGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to VNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check VNGDF's competition here
PCDVF vs EQBBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, EQBBF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while EQBBF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas EQBBF's P/E ratio is 41.07. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EQBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and EQBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQBBF's competition here
PCDVF vs PGPHF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, PGPHF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while PGPHF trades at $1,406.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas PGPHF's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PGPHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and PGPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGPHF's competition here
PCDVF vs LGGNF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, LGGNF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while LGGNF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas LGGNF's P/E ratio is 85.75. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LGGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and LGGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGGNF's competition here
PCDVF vs IHPCF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IHPCF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IHPCF trades at $60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IHPCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IHPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and IHPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IHPCF's competition here
PCDVF vs STMZF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, STMZF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while STMZF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas STMZF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STMZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to STMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check STMZF's competition here
PCDVF vs AMDUF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, AMDUF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while AMDUF trades at $80.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas AMDUF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMDUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to AMDUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check AMDUF's competition here
PCDVF vs IVTBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IVTBF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IVTBF trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IVTBF's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IVTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IVTBF's competition here
PCDVF vs IDDTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IDDTF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IDDTF trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IDDTF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDDTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IDDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IDDTF's competition here
PCDVF vs JBARF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, JBARF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while JBARF trades at $70.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas JBARF's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JBARF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and JBARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JBARF's competition here
PCDVF vs JBAXY Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, JBAXY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while JBAXY trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas JBAXY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JBAXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to JBAXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check JBAXY's competition here
PCDVF vs IDTVF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IDTVF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IDTVF trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IDTVF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDTVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IDTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IDTVF's competition here
PCDVF vs HALFF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, HALFF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while HALFF trades at $145.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas HALFF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HALFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to HALFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check HALFF's competition here
PCDVF vs LBGUF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, LBGUF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while LBGUF trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas LBGUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LBGUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to LBGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check LBGUF's competition here
PCDVF vs SBHGF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, SBHGF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while SBHGF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas SBHGF's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SBHGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to SBHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check SBHGF's competition here
PCDVF vs GBLBY Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, GBLBY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while GBLBY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas GBLBY's P/E ratio is 295.00. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GBLBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and GBLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBLBY's competition here
PCDVF vs SFNXF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, SFNXF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while SFNXF trades at $320.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas SFNXF's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SFNXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and SFNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFNXF's competition here
PCDVF vs GBLBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, GBLBF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while GBLBF trades at $87.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas GBLBF's P/E ratio is 313.21. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GBLBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and GBLBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBLBF's competition here
PCDVF vs GSCE Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, GSCE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while GSCE trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas GSCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GSCE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to GSCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check GSCE's competition here
PCDVF vs PSHZF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, PSHZF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while PSHZF trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas PSHZF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PSHZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to PSHZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check PSHZF's competition here
PCDVF vs STJPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, STJPF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while STJPF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas STJPF's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STJPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to STJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check STJPF's competition here
PCDVF vs SHNWF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, SHNWF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while SHNWF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas SHNWF's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHNWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to SHNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check SHNWF's competition here
PCDVF vs MGPUF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, MGPUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while MGPUF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas MGPUF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGPUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to MGPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check MGPUF's competition here
PCDVF vs IGIFF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IGIFF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IGIFF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IGIFF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IGIFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IGIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IGIFF's competition here
PCDVF vs ICGUF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ICGUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ICGUF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ICGUF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ICGUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to ICGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check ICGUF's competition here
PCDVF vs FLIVF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, FLIVF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while FLIVF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas FLIVF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FLIVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and FLIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLIVF's competition here
PCDVF vs IVPEF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IVPEF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IVPEF trades at $131.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IVPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVPEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IVPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IVPEF's competition here
PCDVF vs ALITF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ALITF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ALITF trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ALITF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALITF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and ALITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALITF's competition here
PCDVF vs DAXXF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, DAXXF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while DAXXF trades at $159.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas DAXXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and DAXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAXXF's competition here
PCDVF vs AFOVF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, AFOVF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while AFOVF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas AFOVF's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AFOVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and AFOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFOVF's competition here
PCDVF vs HRGLF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, HRGLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while HRGLF trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas HRGLF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HRGLF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to HRGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check HRGLF's competition here
PCDVF vs ONEXF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ONEXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ONEXF trades at $82.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ONEXF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ONEXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to ONEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check ONEXF's competition here
PCDVF vs HRGLY Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, HRGLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while HRGLY trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas HRGLY's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HRGLY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to HRGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check HRGLY's competition here
PCDVF vs HSXUF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, HSXUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while HSXUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas HSXUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HSXUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and HSXUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSXUF's competition here
PCDVF vs ISRPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ISRPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ISRPF trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ISRPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ISRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to ISRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check ISRPF's competition here
PCDVF vs CCGDF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, CCGDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while CCGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas CCGDF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCGDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to CCGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check CCGDF's competition here
PCDVF vs AZIHF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, AZIHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while AZIHF trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas AZIHF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AZIHF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and AZIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZIHF's competition here
PCDVF vs TTBXF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TTBXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TTBXF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TTBXF's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTBXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to TTBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check TTBXF's competition here
PCDVF vs SLFPY Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, SLFPY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while SLFPY trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas SLFPY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLFPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to SLFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check SLFPY's competition here
PCDVF vs VUKEF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, VUKEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while VUKEF trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas VUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VUKEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to VUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check VUKEF's competition here
PCDVF vs REVNF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, REVNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while REVNF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas REVNF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REVNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to REVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check REVNF's competition here
PCDVF vs SLFPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, SLFPF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while SLFPF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas SLFPF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLFPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and SLFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLFPF's competition here
PCDVF vs NINTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, NINTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while NINTF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas NINTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NINTF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and NINTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NINTF's competition here
PCDVF vs VGDDF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, VGDDF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while VGDDF trades at $119.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas VGDDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGDDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and VGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VGDDF's competition here
PCDVF vs EUZOF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, EUZOF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while EUZOF trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas EUZOF's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUZOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to EUZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check EUZOF's competition here
PCDVF vs WNDLF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, WNDLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while WNDLF trades at $97.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas WNDLF's P/E ratio is -28.41. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WNDLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to WNDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check WNDLF's competition here
PCDVF vs RMGOF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, RMGOF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while RMGOF trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas RMGOF's P/E ratio is 100.34. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RMGOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to RMGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check RMGOF's competition here
PCDVF vs VONHF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, VONHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while VONHF trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas VONHF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VONHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to VONHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check VONHF's competition here
PCDVF vs MEIEF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, MEIEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while MEIEF trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas MEIEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MEIEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to MEIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check MEIEF's competition here
PCDVF vs RITPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, RITPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while RITPF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas RITPF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RITPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to RITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check RITPF's competition here
PCDVF vs TKKHF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TKKHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TKKHF trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TKKHF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TKKHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to TKKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check TKKHF's competition here
PCDVF vs AMSPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, AMSPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while AMSPF trades at $117.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas AMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to AMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check AMSPF's competition here
PCDVF vs PVVLF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, PVVLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while PVVLF trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas PVVLF's P/E ratio is 119.90. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PVVLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and PVVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PVVLF's competition here
PCDVF vs MNKIF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, MNKIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while MNKIF trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas MNKIF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MNKIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to MNKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check MNKIF's competition here
PCDVF vs BMMWF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BMMWF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BMMWF trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BMMWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BMMWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to BMMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check BMMWF's competition here
PCDVF vs QUILF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, QUILF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while QUILF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas QUILF's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QUILF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to QUILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check QUILF's competition here
PCDVF vs IXSRF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IXSRF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IXSRF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IXSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IXSRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and IXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IXSRF's competition here
PCDVF vs BBAGF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BBAGF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BBAGF trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BBAGF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BBAGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to BBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check BBAGF's competition here
PCDVF vs CALEF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, CALEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while CALEF trades at $52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas CALEF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CALEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and CALEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CALEF's competition here
PCDVF vs RTBBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, RTBBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while RTBBF trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas RTBBF's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RTBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and RTBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTBBF's competition here
PCDVF vs TKCPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TKCPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TKCPF trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TKCPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TKCPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to TKCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check TKCPF's competition here
PCDVF vs BZSPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BZSPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BZSPF trades at $69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BZSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BZSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BZSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZSPF's competition here
PCDVF vs TXEMF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TXEMF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TXEMF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TXEMF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TXEMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and TXEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TXEMF's competition here
PCDVF vs ISMCF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ISMCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ISMCF trades at $653.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ISMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ISMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to ISMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check ISMCF's competition here
PCDVF vs CRPFY Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, CRPFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while CRPFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas CRPFY's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRPFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and CRPFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRPFY's competition here
PCDVF vs ENDTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ENDTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ENDTF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ENDTF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENDTF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and ENDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENDTF's competition here
PCDVF vs JTCPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, JTCPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while JTCPF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas JTCPF's P/E ratio is -188.33. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JTCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to JTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check JTCPF's competition here
PCDVF vs FECHF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, FECHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while FECHF trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas FECHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FECHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to FECHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check FECHF's competition here
PCDVF vs FFXDF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, FFXDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while FFXDF trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas FFXDF's P/E ratio is 62.33. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FFXDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to FFXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check FFXDF's competition here
PCDVF vs WTNTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, WTNTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while WTNTF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas WTNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WTNTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and WTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTNTF's competition here
PCDVF vs SFFFF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, SFFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while SFFFF trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas SFFFF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SFFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to SFFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check SFFFF's competition here
PCDVF vs CEVIF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, CEVIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while CEVIF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas CEVIF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEVIF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to CEVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check CEVIF's competition here
PCDVF vs EHITF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, EHITF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while EHITF trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas EHITF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EHITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and EHITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EHITF's competition here
PCDVF vs AJMPF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, AJMPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while AJMPF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas AJMPF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AJMPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and AJMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AJMPF's competition here
PCDVF vs BHMDF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BHMDF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BHMDF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BHMDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BHMDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BHMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHMDF's competition here
PCDVF vs AVGTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, AVGTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while AVGTF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas AVGTF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to AVGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check AVGTF's competition here
PCDVF vs ISCMF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, ISCMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while ISCMF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas ISCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ISCMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and ISCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISCMF's competition here
PCDVF vs PPTTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, PPTTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while PPTTF trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas PPTTF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PPTTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and PPTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPTTF's competition here
PCDVF vs BLGFF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BLGFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BLGFF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BLGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLGFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BLGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLGFF's competition here
PCDVF vs BWMTF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, BWMTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while BWMTF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas BWMTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BWMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and BWMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWMTF's competition here
PCDVF vs TGONF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, TGONF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while TGONF trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas TGONF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TGONF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and TGONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGONF's competition here
PCDVF vs CYMBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, CYMBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while CYMBF trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas CYMBF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CYMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and CYMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYMBF's competition here
PCDVF vs RTOBF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, RTOBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while RTOBF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas RTOBF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RTOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and RTOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOBF's competition here
PCDVF vs IHRMF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IHRMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IHRMF trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IHRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IHRMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to IHRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check IHRMF's competition here
PCDVF vs IGBSF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, IGBSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while IGBSF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas IGBSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IGBSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and IGBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGBSF's competition here
PCDVF vs UCPLF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, UCPLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while UCPLF trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas UCPLF's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UCPLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to UCPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check UCPLF's competition here
PCDVF vs MGLLF Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, MGLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while MGLLF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas MGLLF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF and MGLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGLLF's competition here
PCDVF vs FSEN Comparison July 2025
PCDVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCDVF stands at 688.1M. In comparison, FSEN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCDVF is priced at $0.26, while FSEN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -26.00, whereas FSEN's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, PCDVF's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FSEN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCDVF is less volatile compared to FSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCDVF.Check FSEN's competition here