PetroChina Company Limited

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 211.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while RYDAF trades at $36.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check RYDAF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while TTFNF trades at $63.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check TTFNF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while SNPMF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SNPMF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while BPAQF trades at $5.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 140.13. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check BPAQF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OMVKY trades at $14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OMVKY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check RNFTF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while STOHF trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check STOHF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while EIPAF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check EIPAF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check LUKOY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PETFF trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PETFF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PUTRY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while GLPEY trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check GLPEY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PUTRF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PSKOF trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PSKOF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while REPYY trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check REPYY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while REPYF trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check REPYF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OMVJF trades at $54.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OMVJF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OGFGY trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OGFGY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while GLPEF trades at $18.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check GLPEF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OGFGF trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OGFGF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while MGYOY trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check MGYOY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OAOFY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SLTQY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check HLPMF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check ISRMF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check RTEXF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check WDGJY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while UNTC trades at $28.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check UNTC's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while WDGJF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check WDGJF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PXPEF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SEGYY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while UNTCW trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check UNTCW's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while ECTM trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check ECTM's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OKMN trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OKMN's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check GRGUF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while POGS trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check POGS's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while AEDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check AEDC's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while TRNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check TRNX's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 29K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PEMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PEMC's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while SNVP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SNVP's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while FRMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check FRMC's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while PGAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PGAS's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while BNXR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check BNXR's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while AMNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check AMNE's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check NUSPQ's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while RRRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check RRRI's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SNPTY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check VCOGF's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while POGWY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check POGWY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SGTZY's competition here

PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 220.6B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.97, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.44, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OJSCY's competition here