PetroChina Company Limited
PetroChina Company Limited (PCCYF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PCCYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCCYF | $0.95 | +3.49% | 216.6B | 7.31 | $0.13 | +29.56% |
| RYDAF | $34.85 | -3.01% | 204.2B | 15.91 | $2.19 | +4.03% |
| TTFNF | $60.91 | +0.18% | 134.2B | 11.03 | $5.52 | +5.78% |
| SNPMF | $0.56 | -1.40% | 88.5B | 9.33 | $0.06 | +28.65% |
| BPAQF | $5.52 | +1.66% | 86B | -78.86 | -$0.07 | +5.83% |
| OMVKY | $13.75 | +0.81% | 72.1B | 14.51 | $0.95 | +10.92% |
| STOHF | $26.73 | +3.60% | 67.8B | 8.85 | $3.02 | +17.17% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| EIPAF | $16.99 | -6.85% | 53B | 19.78 | $0.91 | +4.58% |
| LUKOY | $6.96 | -42.00% | 49B | 0.40 | $17.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PCCYF vs RYDAF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 204.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while RYDAF trades at $34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check RYDAF's competition here
PCCYF vs TTFNF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while TTFNF trades at $60.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and TTFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTFNF's competition here
PCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while SNPMF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and SNPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNPMF's competition here
PCCYF vs BPAQF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while BPAQF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -78.86. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check BPAQF's competition here
PCCYF vs OMVKY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OMVKY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OMVKY's competition here
PCCYF vs STOHF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while STOHF trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and STOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOHF's competition here
PCCYF vs RNFTF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and RNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNFTF's competition here
PCCYF vs EIPAF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while EIPAF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check EIPAF's competition here
PCCYF vs LUKOY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check LUKOY's competition here
PCCYF vs PETFF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and PETFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PETFF's competition here
PCCYF vs GLPEY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while GLPEY trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check GLPEY's competition here
PCCYF vs PUTRF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PUTRF's competition here
PCCYF vs PUTRY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PUTRY's competition here
PCCYF vs PSKOF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PSKOF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check PSKOF's competition here
PCCYF vs REPYY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while REPYY trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check REPYY's competition here
PCCYF vs REPYF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while REPYF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check REPYF's competition here
PCCYF vs OMVJF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OMVJF trades at $54.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OMVJF's competition here
PCCYF vs OGFGY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OGFGY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check OGFGY's competition here
PCCYF vs GLPEF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while GLPEF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check GLPEF's competition here
PCCYF vs OGFGF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OGFGF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and OGFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OGFGF's competition here
PCCYF vs MGYOY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while MGYOY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check MGYOY's competition here
PCCYF vs OAOFY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and OAOFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OAOFY's competition here
PCCYF vs SLTQY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SLTQY's competition here
PCCYF vs HLPMF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check HLPMF's competition here
PCCYF vs ISRMF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check ISRMF's competition here
PCCYF vs RTEXF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and RTEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTEXF's competition here
PCCYF vs WDGJY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and WDGJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WDGJY's competition here
PCCYF vs UNTC Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while UNTC trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check UNTC's competition here
PCCYF vs WDGJF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 220M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while WDGJF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check WDGJF's competition here
PCCYF vs PXPEF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and PXPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXPEF's competition here
PCCYF vs SEGYY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SEGYY's competition here
PCCYF vs ECTM Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while ECTM trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check ECTM's competition here
PCCYF vs OKMN Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OKMN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and OKMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OKMN's competition here
PCCYF vs UNTCW Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while UNTCW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and UNTCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNTCW's competition here
PCCYF vs GRGUF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and GRGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRGUF's competition here
PCCYF vs POGS Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 636.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while POGS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check POGS's competition here
PCCYF vs AEDC Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check AEDC's competition here
PCCYF vs TRNX Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and TRNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRNX's competition here
PCCYF vs PEMC Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and PEMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEMC's competition here
PCCYF vs SNVP Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SNVP's competition here
PCCYF vs FRMC Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check FRMC's competition here
PCCYF vs PGAS Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and PGAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGAS's competition here
PCCYF vs BNXR Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and BNXR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNXR's competition here
PCCYF vs AMNE Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check AMNE's competition here
PCCYF vs NUSPQ Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check NUSPQ's competition here
PCCYF vs RRRI Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check RRRI's competition here
PCCYF vs SGTZY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and SGTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGTZY's competition here
PCCYF vs POGWY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and POGWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POGWY's competition here
PCCYF vs VCOGF Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and VCOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCOGF's competition here
PCCYF vs SNPTY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCCYF.Check SNPTY's competition here
PCCYF vs OJSCY Comparison July 2025
PCCYF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCCYF stands at 216.6B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCCYF is priced at $0.95, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCCYF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.31, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, PCCYF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PCCYF and OJSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OJSCY's competition here