PointsBet Holdings Limited

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PDYPY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PDYPY trades at $103.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PDYPY's P/E ratio is -494.05. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PDYPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to PDYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check PDYPY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check PDYPF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ARLUF trades at $46.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and ARLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARLUF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GXYYY trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GXYYY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GXYEF trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GXYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GXYEF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SCHYY trades at $23.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and SCHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCHYY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SCHYF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to SCHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check SCHYF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EVGGF trades at $88.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check EVGGF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EVVTY trades at $89.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check EVVTY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GMVHF trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GMVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GMVHF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GMVHY trades at $13.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GMVHY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GOFPY trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GOFPY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while MCHVF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and MCHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHVF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GRKZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GRKZF trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GRKZF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GRKZF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GRKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GRKZF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GIGNY trades at $31.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GIGNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GIGNY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while LTRCF trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to LTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check LTRCF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GIGNF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GIGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GIGNF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while LFDJF trades at $34.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to LFDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check LFDJF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PYTCY trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 81.82. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to PYTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check PYTCY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while WYNMY trades at $8.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and WYNMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WYNMY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while WYNMF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to WYNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check WYNMF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SKXJF trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and SKXJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKXJF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BMRMF trades at $121.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to BMRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check BMRMF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GEBHY trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GEBHY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GEBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GEBEY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SJMHF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to SJMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check SJMHF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GEBHF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GEBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GEBHF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GMALY trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GMALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GMALY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and KNDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNDGF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GMALF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GMALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GMALF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while NGCRF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to NGCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check NGCRF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SJMHY trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and SJMHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJMHY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while NGCRY trades at $32.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and NGCRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGCRY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PYTCF trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to PYTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check PYTCF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while MDEVF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to MDEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check MDEVF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BLBRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and BLBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLBRF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and BVHBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVHBB's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while TABCF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to TABCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check TABCF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while TACBY trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TACBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and TACBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACBY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 929.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while MDEVY trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and MDEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDEVY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to BJSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check BJSAF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and IRLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLTY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while RANKF trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and RANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RANKF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and IRLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLTF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 565.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while MCHVY trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to MCHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check MCHVY's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PBKOF trades at $16.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and PBKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBKOF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 441M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SKYZF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to SKYZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check SKYZF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EIHDF has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EIHDF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EIHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EIHDF's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to EIHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check EIHDF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, KMBIF has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while KMBIF trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas KMBIF's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to KMBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to KMBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check KMBIF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BYNEF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and BYNEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYNEF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PDSSF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to PDSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check PDSSF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EHGRF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to EHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check EHGRF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while AGTEF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and AGTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGTEF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 224.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while AINSF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check AINSF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GHIFF trades at $9.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GHIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GHIFF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PSDMF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to PSDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check PSDMF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and PMKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMKRF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and RCTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCTUF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while MALDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MALDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and MALDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALDF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ARHN has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ARHN trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ARHN's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ARHN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and ARHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHN's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GLXZ trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check GLXZ's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and CTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTTMF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while TBTC trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to TBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check TBTC's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while JPOTF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check JPOTF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BRRE trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -740.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and BRRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRRE's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and JKPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JKPTF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check TNTAF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to SPOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check SPOZF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and NWGIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWGIW's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while CETMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and CETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CETMF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to RYWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check RYWCF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while RVLCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and RVLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVLCF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while BRVO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and BRVO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRVO's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while LTFD trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to LTFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check LTFD's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check ITMZF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while THRSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check THRSF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, FCNE has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while FCNE trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FCNE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FCNE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to FCNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check FCNE's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while RVRVF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and RVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVRVF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ELRA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to ELRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check ELRA's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while GMER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GMER's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and GMER have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMER's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 521.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check FUNFF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 311.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while WPFH trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check WPFH's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 277.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while WNRS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and WNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNRS's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 101.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while VETIF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and VETIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VETIF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EXPH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to EXPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check EXPH's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 75.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while SWCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to SWCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check SWCC's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 37.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EMBR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and EMBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMBR's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while EPGG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and EPGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPGG's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to LUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check LUKEF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while NTGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and NTGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTGL's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ELYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and ELYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELYS's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while KNBA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF is less volatile compared to KNBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBTHF.Check KNBA's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while CGAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and CGAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGAM's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ROBK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and ROBK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROBK's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and LTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTTGF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 32. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while AMRA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and AMRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRA's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 11. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while ULSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and ULSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ULSP's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, MLCOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while MLCOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MLCOF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MLCOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and MLCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLCOF's competition here

PBTHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBTHF stands at 218.9M. In comparison, CWLDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBTHF is priced at $0.45, while CWLDY trades at $19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBTHF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CWLDY's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, PBTHF's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CWLDY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBTHF and CWLDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWLDY's competition here