ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE
ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE (PBSFY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBSFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBSFY | $2.04 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -12.75 | -$0.16 | +0.74% |
| RGLXY | $3.46 | -13.50% | 6.2B | 16.00 | $0.25 | +7.05% |
| FJTNF | $27.73 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -42.66 | -$0.65 | +1.24% |
| NPTVF | $21.76 | -0.02% | 5.4B | 17.27 | $1.26 | +1.24% |
| RGLXF | $33.18 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 13.60 | $2.44 | +7.53% |
| FJTNY | $11.62 | -11.50% | 4.8B | -35.21 | -$0.33 | +1.38% |
| ITVPY | $11.14 | -5.39% | 4.2B | 16.63 | $0.67 | +5.87% |
| ITVPF | $1.11 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 15.86 | $0.07 | +5.88% |
| SGBAF | $7.11 | -3.79% | 3B | -64.64 | -$0.11 | +7.84% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
Stock Comparison
PBSFY vs RGLXY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while RGLXY trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGLXY's competition here
PBSFY vs FJTNF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while FJTNF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is -42.66. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and FJTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJTNF's competition here
PBSFY vs NPTVF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while NPTVF trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and NPTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPTVF's competition here
PBSFY vs RGLXF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RGLXF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while RGLXF trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas RGLXF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGLXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to RGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check RGLXF's competition here
PBSFY vs FJTNY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while FJTNY trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is -35.21. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to FJTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check FJTNY's competition here
PBSFY vs ITVPY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while ITVPY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to ITVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check ITVPY's competition here
PBSFY vs ITVPF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while ITVPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to ITVPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check ITVPF's competition here
PBSFY vs SGBAF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SGBAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while SGBAF trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas SGBAF's P/E ratio is -64.64. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGBAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to SGBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check SGBAF's competition here
PBSFY vs TKOBF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKOBF's competition here
PBSFY vs TVFCF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TVFCF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to TVFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check TVFCF's competition here
PBSFY vs THDDY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while THDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check THDDY's competition here
PBSFY vs TVAHF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TVAHF trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and TVAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVAHF's competition here
PBSFY vs MTPVY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while MTPVY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check MTPVY's competition here
PBSFY vs PBSFF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check PBSFF's competition here
PBSFY vs GETVF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETVF's competition here
PBSFY vs SKPJY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKPJY's competition here
PBSFY vs STGYF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 504.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while STGYF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and STGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STGYF's competition here
PBSFY vs BECVY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 422M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while BECVY trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and BECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BECVY's competition here
PBSFY vs TVBCY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TVBCY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and TVBCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVBCY's competition here
PBSFY vs TVBCF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVBCF's competition here
PBSFY vs AZTEF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZTEF's competition here
PBSFY vs TVAGF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check TVAGF's competition here
PBSFY vs EMMS Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while EMMS trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and EMMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMMS's competition here
PBSFY vs LUDG Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while LUDG trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and LUDG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUDG's competition here
PBSFY vs AOECF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AOECF's competition here
PBSFY vs PEGX Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while PEGX trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check PEGX's competition here
PBSFY vs INCT Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check INCT's competition here
PBSFY vs FHLD Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while FHLD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to FHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check FHLD's competition here
PBSFY vs AITVF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while AITVF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AITVF's competition here
PBSFY vs TVTV Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TVTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check TVTV's competition here
PBSFY vs AUDAQ Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check AUDAQ's competition here
PBSFY vs LPTV Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 710.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while LPTV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check LPTV's competition here
PBSFY vs TFBN Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFBN's competition here
PBSFY vs TLDE Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 626.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLDE's competition here
PBSFY vs PSRU Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSRU's competition here
PBSFY vs SBSAA Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 310.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while SBSAA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to SBSAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check SBSAA's competition here
PBSFY vs MEMI Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check MEMI's competition here
PBSFY vs TMGI Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 103.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while TMGI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to TMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check TMGI's competition here
PBSFY vs FONU Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check FONU's competition here
PBSFY vs WTKN Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBSFY.Check WTKN's competition here
PBSFY vs WNRC Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WNRC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNRC's competition here
PBSFY vs MNIZ Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 932. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while MNIZ trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and MNIZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNIZ's competition here
PBSFY vs MCTZF Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCTZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCTZF's competition here
PBSFY vs GETVY Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GETVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while GETVY trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETVY's competition here
PBSFY vs ALLN Comparison July 2025
PBSFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBSFY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBSFY is priced at $2.04, while ALLN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of -12.75, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBSFY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PBSFY and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALLN's competition here