Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Pembina Pipeline Corporation PBNAF Peers
See (PBNAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBNAF | $15.95 | +2.07% | 9.26B | 9.01 | $1.77 | +10.18% |
| ENBRF | $14.01 | -0.55% | 103.08B | N/A | N/A | +13.79% |
| ENBGF | $17.00 | +2.44% | 101.76B | N/A | N/A | +10.49% |
| EBRZF | $12.80 | N/A | 100.47B | N/A | N/A | +13.70% |
| ENNPF | $15.50 | N/A | 100.47B | N/A | N/A | +12.11% |
| EBRGF | $12.50 | N/A | 100.47B | N/A | N/A | +13.49% |
| EBBNF | $22.92 | +1.08% | 98.14B | 10.33 | $2.22 | +6.42% |
| EBGEF | $23.95 | +0.47% | 52.22B | 10.79 | $2.22 | +9.70% |
| EBBGF | $23.69 | +1.02% | 51.65B | 10.68 | $2.22 | +7.09% |
| TNCAF | $11.35 | N/A | 50.58B | 4.47 | $2.54 | +13.22% |
Stock Comparison
PBNAF vs ENBRF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 103.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while ENBRF trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs ENBGF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 101.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs EBRZF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 100.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while EBRZF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs ENNPF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 100.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while ENNPF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs EBRGF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 100.47B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while EBRGF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs EBBNF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 98.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while EBBNF trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs EBGEF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 52.22B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while EBGEF trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs EBBGF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 51.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while EBBGF trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs TNCAF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 50.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while TNCAF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs TCANF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 50.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while TCANF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs MPLXP Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.07B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs PMMBF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 21.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs PMBPF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 20.27B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while PMBPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs SOCGM Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 16.31B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while SOCGM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to SOCGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs PPLAF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while PPLAF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs KEYUF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while KEYUF trades at $31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs EQTNP Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs FRVWY Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while FRVWY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs VOPKY Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while VOPKY trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs VOPKF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while VOPKF trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs TPZEF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while TPZEF trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 69.41. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs GBNXF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while GBNXF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs SOCGP Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while SOCGP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to SOCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs SPKOY Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs FDVWF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while FDVWF trades at $71.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to FDVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs SNPKF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to SNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs OGSRW Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs TWMIF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 64.68M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while TWMIF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs AVACF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 28.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while AVACF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs TTNN Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs MRGE Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to MRGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs CWPE Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 987620.00. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while CWPE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs GMLPF Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 495166.00. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while GMLPF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs LOGL Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9421.00. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs FLST Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400.00. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.
PBNAF vs TIDE Comparison
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 9.26B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $15.95, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.01, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.