Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBNAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBNAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBNAF | $17.61 | +0.00% | 10.2B | 9.94 | $1.77 | +6.62% |
| EBRGF | $14.42 | +0.00% | 98.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.45% |
| ENNPF | $17.54 | +0.00% | 98.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.82% |
| ENBGF | $17.00 | +0.00% | 98.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| EBBNF | $23.70 | +0.00% | 98.3B | 10.68 | $2.22 | +6.18% |
| EBGEF | $24.38 | -0.04% | 53.2B | 10.99 | $2.22 | +6.85% |
| EBBGF | $24.23 | +0.21% | 52.8B | 10.92 | $2.22 | +6.92% |
| TCANF | $5.39 | +0.00% | 48.8B | 2.12 | $2.54 | +6.47% |
| TNCAF | $13.65 | +5.44% | 48.8B | 5.38 | $2.54 | +7.14% |
| ENBRF | $16.00 | +0.00% | 34.9B | N/A | N/A | +8.00% |
Stock Comparison
PBNAF vs EBRGF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EBRGF has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while EBRGF trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas EBRGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBRGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to EBRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check EBRGF's competition here
PBNAF vs ENNPF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ENNPF has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while ENNPF trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas ENNPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENNPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to ENNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check ENNPF's competition here
PBNAF vs ENBGF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ENBGF has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while ENBGF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas ENBGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENBGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to ENBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check ENBGF's competition here
PBNAF vs EBBNF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EBBNF has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while EBBNF trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas EBBNF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBBNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to EBBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check EBBNF's competition here
PBNAF vs EBGEF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EBGEF has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while EBGEF trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas EBGEF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBGEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to EBGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check EBGEF's competition here
PBNAF vs EBBGF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EBBGF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while EBBGF trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas EBBGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBBGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to EBBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check EBBGF's competition here
PBNAF vs TCANF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TCANF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while TCANF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TCANF's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCANF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check TCANF's competition here
PBNAF vs TNCAF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TNCAF has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while TNCAF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TNCAF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNCAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to TNCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check TNCAF's competition here
PBNAF vs ENBRF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ENBRF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while ENBRF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas ENBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENBRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to ENBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check ENBRF's competition here
PBNAF vs MPLXP Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check MPLXP's competition here
PBNAF vs EBRZF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EBRZF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while EBRZF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas EBRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBRZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to EBRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check EBRZF's competition here
PBNAF vs PMMBF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PMMBF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while PMMBF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas PMMBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMMBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to PMMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check PMMBF's competition here
PBNAF vs SOCGM Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SOCGM has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while SOCGM trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas SOCGM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOCGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to SOCGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check SOCGM's competition here
PBNAF vs PPLAF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PPLAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while PPLAF trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas PPLAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPLAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to PPLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check PPLAF's competition here
PBNAF vs PMBPF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PMBPF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while PMBPF trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas PMBPF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMBPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to PMBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check PMBPF's competition here
PBNAF vs FRVWY Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FRVWY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while FRVWY trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas FRVWY's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRVWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to FRVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check FRVWY's competition here
PBNAF vs KEYUF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KEYUF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while KEYUF trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas KEYUF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEYUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to KEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check KEYUF's competition here
PBNAF vs EQTNP Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EQTNP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while EQTNP trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas EQTNP's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQTNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to EQTNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check EQTNP's competition here
PBNAF vs VOPKY Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VOPKY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while VOPKY trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas VOPKY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOPKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to VOPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check VOPKY's competition here
PBNAF vs VOPKF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VOPKF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while VOPKF trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas VOPKF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOPKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to VOPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check VOPKF's competition here
PBNAF vs GBNXF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GBNXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while GBNXF trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas GBNXF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBNXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to GBNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check GBNXF's competition here
PBNAF vs TPZEF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TPZEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while TPZEF trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TPZEF's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TPZEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TPZEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check TPZEF's competition here
PBNAF vs SOCGP Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SOCGP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while SOCGP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas SOCGP's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOCGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to SOCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check SOCGP's competition here
PBNAF vs FDVWF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FDVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while FDVWF trades at $103.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas FDVWF's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDVWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to FDVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check FDVWF's competition here
PBNAF vs SPKOY Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SPKOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while SPKOY trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas SPKOY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to SPKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check SPKOY's competition here
PBNAF vs SNPKF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SNPKF has a market cap of 945.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while SNPKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas SNPKF's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to SNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check SNPKF's competition here
PBNAF vs OGSRW Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OGSRW has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while OGSRW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas OGSRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGSRW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to OGSRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check OGSRW's competition here
PBNAF vs TWMIF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TWMIF has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while TWMIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TWMIF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check TWMIF's competition here
PBNAF vs AVACF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AVACF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while AVACF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas AVACF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVACF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to AVACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check AVACF's competition here
PBNAF vs TTNN Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TTNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while TTNN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TTNN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTNN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TTNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check TTNN's competition here
PBNAF vs CWPE Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CWPE has a market cap of 650.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while CWPE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas CWPE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to CWPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check CWPE's competition here
PBNAF vs MRGE Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MRGE has a market cap of 546.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while MRGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas MRGE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRGE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to MRGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check MRGE's competition here
PBNAF vs GMLPF Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GMLPF has a market cap of 56.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while GMLPF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas GMLPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMLPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to GMLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check GMLPF's competition here
PBNAF vs LOGL Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, LOGL has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while LOGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas LOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to LOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check LOGL's competition here
PBNAF vs FLST Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FLST has a market cap of 400. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while FLST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas FLST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLST's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is less volatile compared to FLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check FLST's competition here
PBNAF vs TIDE Comparison July 2025
PBNAF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBNAF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TIDE has a market cap of 250. Regarding current trading prices, PBNAF is priced at $17.61, while TIDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBNAF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.94, whereas TIDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBNAF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIDE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBNAF is more volatile compared to TIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBNAF.Check TIDE's competition here