Pollard Banknote Limited

PBL.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 530.53M. In comparison, GH.TO has a market cap of 220.80M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at $19.60, while GH.TO trades at $10.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.42, whereas GH.TO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GH.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to GH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.

PBL.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 530.53M. In comparison, FANS.TO has a market cap of 26.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at $19.60, while FANS.TO trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.42, whereas FANS.TO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FANS.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is less volatile compared to FANS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.

PBL.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 530.53M. In comparison, SKLL.CN has a market cap of 11.16M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at $19.60, while SKLL.CN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.42, whereas SKLL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKLL.CN's ROE of +4.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to SKLL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.

PBL.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PBL.TO stands at 530.53M. In comparison, JKPT.CN has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, PBL.TO is priced at $19.60, while JKPT.CN trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PBL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.42, whereas JKPT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PBL.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKPT.CN's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PBL.TO is more volatile compared to JKPT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBL.TO.