Payfare Inc.
Payfare Inc. (PAY.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAY.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAY.TO | CA$4.00 | +0.00% | 193.1M | 10.26 | CA$0.39 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$36.95 | +0.24% | 5.4T | 38.09 | CA$0.97 | +0.64% |
| PANW.NE | CA$22.06 | -5.65% | 168B | 105.05 | CA$0.21 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +0.58% |
| BB.TO | CA$5.17 | +0.19% | 3.1B | 172.33 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | CA$5.33 | -2.02% | 1.5B | -8.08 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | CA$11.99 | +0.08% | 943.5M | -49.96 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | CA$8.96 | +0.56% | 874.7M | -47.16 | -CA$0.19 | N/A |
| DND.TO | CA$11.58 | +27.39% | 778.2M | -4.75 | -CA$2.44 | +0.64% |
| TC.TO | CA$25.71 | -3.02% | 284.3M | -2.09 | -CA$12.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAY.TO vs MSFT.NE Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check MSFT.NE's competition here
PAY.TO vs PANW.NE Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 168B. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while PANW.NE trades at CA$22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 105.05. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check PANW.NE's competition here
PAY.TO vs NVEI.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check NVEI.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs BB.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while BB.TO trades at CA$5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is 172.33. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check BB.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs TIXT.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check TIXT.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs CPLF.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check CPLF.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs CVO.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 874.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while CVO.TO trades at CA$8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -47.16. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check CVO.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs DND.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 778.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while DND.TO trades at CA$11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check DND.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs TC.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while TC.TO trades at CA$25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check TC.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs STC.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while STC.TO trades at CA$7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -26.45. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check STC.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs GIVX.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check GIVX.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs HAI.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while HAI.TO trades at CA$4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is -123.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check HAI.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs RAIL.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check RAIL.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs NC.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check NC.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs MOGO.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check MOGO.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs BVCI.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check BVCI.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs SCPE.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check SCPE.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs PACT.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check PACT.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs HANK.V Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check HANK.V's competition here
PAY.TO vs ICS.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while ICS.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check ICS.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs EONX.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check EONX.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs CYBT.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check CYBT.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs IP.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check IP.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs NFTX.NE Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +52.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check NFTX.NE's competition here
PAY.TO vs VPN.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check VPN.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs OPT.TO Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check OPT.TO's competition here
PAY.TO vs PKK.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check PKK.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs PERK.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check PERK.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs SCYB.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is less volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check SCYB.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs MBLM.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check MBLM.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs DSAI.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check DSAI.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs HRO.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check HRO.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs APP.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check APP.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs BYND.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check BYND.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs AMPD.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check AMPD.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs SQID.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PAY.TO is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAY.TO.Check SQID.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs TAAL.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PAY.TO has daily volatility of 0.25 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check TAAL.CN's competition here
PAY.TO vs EAP.CN Comparison July 2025
PAY.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAY.TO stands at 193.1M. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAY.TO is priced at CA$4.00, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.26, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, PAY.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PAY.TO has daily volatility of 0.25 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EAP.CN's competition here