Patria Investments Limited

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VFINX trades at $588.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VFINX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VOO trades at $584.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VOO's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VITSX trades at $152.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VITSX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTSAX trades at $152.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTSAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 665.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FXAIX trades at $221.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FXAIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 648.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTI trades at $313.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTI's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 641.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while IVV trades at $639.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check IVV's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 583B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while SPY trades at $636.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check SPY's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 510.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VXUS trades at $69.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VXUS's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 510.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTSNX trades at $149.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTSNX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 362.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VMCPX trades at $388.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VMCPX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 332.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VIMAX trades at $356.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VIMAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 321.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VIIIX trades at $518.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VIIIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 321.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VINIX trades at $518.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VINIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 299.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RGAGX trades at $83.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RGAGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 299.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while GAFFX trades at $83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check GAFFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 298.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AGTHX trades at $83.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AGTHX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 296.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while GFAFX trades at $82.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.78. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check GFAFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 265.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RGABX trades at $74.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RGABX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 261.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RGAAX trades at $73.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RGAAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 254.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while GFACX trades at $71.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check GFACX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while ABALX trades at $37.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check ABALX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RLBGX trades at $37.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RLBGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while BALFX trades at $37.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check BALFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 250.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AFMBX trades at $37.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AFMBX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 250.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AMBFX trades at $37.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AMBFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VDIPX trades at $28.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VDIPX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 228.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VEA trades at $56.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VEA's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 228.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTMNX trades at $18.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTMNX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 223B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while QQQ trades at $569.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check QQQ's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VB trades at $245.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VB's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while BX trades at $175.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check BX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 195.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTV trades at $179.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTV's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VO trades at $288.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VO's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 174.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while C-PN trades at $29.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check C-PN's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 173.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while BLK trades at $1,121.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check BLK's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 166.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FCNTX trades at $23.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FCNTX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FCNKX trades at $23.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FCNKX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AICFX trades at $64.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AICFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RICBX trades at $63.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RICBX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RICAX trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RICAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AIVSX trades at $64.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AIVSX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AICCX trades at $63.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AICCX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FCTDX trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FCTDX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while NPFFX trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check NPFFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FNPFX trades at $70.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FNPFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RNPGX trades at $70.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RNPGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 154.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while ANWPX trades at $70.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check ANWPX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AFIFX trades at $89.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AFIFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while CFNAX trades at $89.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check CFNAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while ANCFX trades at $89.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check ANCFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AWSHX trades at $65.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AWSHX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RWMFX trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RWMFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FWMIX trades at $64.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FWMIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while CWMAX trades at $64.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check CWMAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 145.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while WSHFX trades at $64.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check WSHFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 143.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while WSHCX trades at $63.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check WSHCX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RWMBX trades at $63.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RWMBX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while IEFA trades at $82.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check IEFA's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AEGFX trades at $60.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AEGFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RERHX trades at $60.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RERHX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RERGX trades at $60.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RERGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AEPGX trades at $60.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AEPGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while KKR trades at $151.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check KKR's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AEPFX trades at $60.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AEPFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AGG trades at $98.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 126.07. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AGG's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while IWF trades at $440.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check IWF's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VWELX trades at $45.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VWELX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VWENX trades at $79.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VWENX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while JLGMX trades at $90.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check JLGMX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while JLGRX trades at $89.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check JLGRX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while SEEGX trades at $86.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check SEEGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VSCIX trades at $117.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VSCIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while NAESX trades at $117.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check NAESX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while BN trades at $68.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 233.69. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check BN's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while FSKAX trades at $175.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check FSKAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VITAX trades at $354.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VITAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTTHX trades at $26.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTTHX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VUG trades at $455.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VUG's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VGT trades at $696.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VGT's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VDADX trades at $56.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VDADX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VIG trades at $208.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VIG's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while TBCIX trades at $207.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check TBCIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while TRBCX trades at $205.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check TRBCX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTHRX trades at $41.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTHRX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while BAM trades at $62.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check BAM's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while PABGX trades at $198.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check PABGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VFORX trades at $47.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VFORX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VTIVX trades at $32.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VTIVX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while IJH trades at $64.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check IJH's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while DODGX trades at $271.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check DODGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RRBGX trades at $185.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RRBGX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while RAFFX trades at $46.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check RAFFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VIEIX trades at $151.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VIEIX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while PRUFX trades at $114.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check PRUFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while PRGFX trades at $113.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check PRGFX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while VEMAX trades at $41.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check VEMAX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AMCPX trades at $45.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AMCPX's competition here

PAX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAX stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAX is priced at $14.08, while AMPFX trades at $44.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAX currently has a P/E ratio of 31.24, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, PAX's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAX is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAX.Check AMPFX's competition here