Paramount Global
Paramount Global PARAP Peers
See (PARAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARAP | $13.74 | +1.33% | 8.4B | 2.24 | $6.14 | +1.65% |
| NFLX | $1,208.55 | -0.25% | 514.3B | 56.95 | $21.22 | N/A |
| DIS | $111.58 | -0.70% | 200.6B | 22.77 | $4.90 | +0.85% |
| LYV | $140.23 | -1.95% | 32.5B | 47.54 | $2.95 | N/A |
| FWONA | $87.51 | -1.26% | 30.3B | 1750.20 | $0.05 | N/A |
| FWONK | $95.47 | -1.27% | 30.2B | 1591.17 | $0.06 | N/A |
| WBD | $10.02 | +4.92% | 24.8B | -2.28 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOX | $51.51 | +0.70% | 24.2B | 12.56 | $4.10 | +0.96% |
| FOXA | $56.15 | +0.63% | 24.1B | 13.90 | $4.04 | +0.96% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
PARAP vs NFLX Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 514.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while NFLX trades at $1,208.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 56.95. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs DIS Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 200.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while DIS trades at $111.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LYV Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LYV trades at $140.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 47.54. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs FWONA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while FWONA trades at $87.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1750.20. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs FWONK Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while FWONK trades at $95.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 1591.17. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs WBD Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while WBD trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs FOX Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while FOX trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs FOXA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while FOXA trades at $56.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs VIAC Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs NWS Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while NWS trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs NWSA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while NWSA trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs WMG Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while WMG trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs TKO Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while TKO trades at $158.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 80.63. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs ROKU Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while ROKU trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -101.32. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs EDR Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs PARA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while PARA trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs PARAA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while PARAA trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs WWE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs SIRI Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while SIRI trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LLYVK Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LLYVK trades at $73.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 273.52. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LLYVA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LLYVA trades at $73.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 261.02. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs NXST Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while NXST trades at $172.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs MSGS Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while MSGS trades at $187.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 989.11. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CNK Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CNK trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs BATRK Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while BATRK trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -122.73. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs BATRA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while BATRA trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -131.39. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs MANU Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while MANU trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs APE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LGF-B Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LGF-A Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LION Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LION trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs BOWL Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs MSGE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while MSGE trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs AMC Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while AMC trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs IMAX Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while IMAX trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs SPHR Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while SPHR trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs SBGI Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while SBGI trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs HUYA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 860.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while HUYA trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs PLAY Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 773.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while PLAY trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs MCS Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while MCS trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -45.61. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs RSVR Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 495.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while RSVR trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs AMCX Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while AMCX trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LIVX Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs IQ Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 222.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while IQ trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs AGAE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while AGAE trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs AENT Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while AENT trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs GAIA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while GAIA trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -22.71. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs GNUS Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LVO Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LVO trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs RSVRW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while RSVRW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CNVS Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CNVS trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CIDM Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs RDI Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while RDI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDI's ROE of -33.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs RDIB Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while RDIB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -33.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs TOON Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while TOON trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs ANGH Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while ANGH trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs ANGHW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs NIPG Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while NIPG trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs ADD Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while ADD trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs MMV Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs KUKE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while KUKE trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs DLPN Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while DLPN trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs BREA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while BREA trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CSCW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs AENTW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while AENTW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CPOP Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CPOP trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs HOFV Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while HOFV trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs BZFDW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while BZFDW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CSSEP Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CSSE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CSSEN Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs BLMZ Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs CSSEL Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs HOFVW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 16.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs AESE Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs VIACP Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs RDBX Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs DISCK Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs EMWP Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs LVOPP Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PARAP has daily volatility of 2.53 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
PARAP vs MSGN Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs HMTV Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs RDBXW Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs DISCB Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs ESGC Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.
PARAP vs VIACA Comparison
PARAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARAP stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PARAP is priced at $13.74, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARAP currently has a P/E ratio of 2.24, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, PARAP's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARAP is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARAP.