Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. PANW.NE Peers
See (PANW.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW.NE | CA$23.89 | +1.75% | 178.7B | 113.76 | CA$0.21 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | CA$33.75 | +0.66% | 5T | 34.79 | CA$0.97 | +0.95% |
| NVEI.TO | CA$47.61 | N/A | 6.8B | 216.41 | CA$0.22 | +0.80% |
| BB.TO | CA$5.58 | +2.20% | 3.3B | -558.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | CA$3.63 | -13.16% | 983.3M | -5.50 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | CA$11.99 | +0.08% | 943.5M | -49.96 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | CA$7.31 | +1.53% | 704.1M | -38.47 | -CA$0.19 | N/A |
| DND.TO | CA$10.23 | -2.57% | 687.5M | -4.19 | -CA$2.44 | +0.74% |
| TC.TO | CA$26.78 | +2.02% | 296.1M | -2.17 | -CA$12.33 | N/A |
| STC.TO | CA$7.74 | +1.42% | 259.3M | -26.69 | -CA$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PANW.NE vs MSFT.NE Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while MSFT.NE trades at CA$33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs NVEI.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while NVEI.TO trades at CA$47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs BB.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while BB.TO trades at CA$5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is -558.00. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs TIXT.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while TIXT.TO trades at CA$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs CPLF.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while CPLF.TO trades at CA$11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs CVO.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 704.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while CVO.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -38.47. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs DND.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 687.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while DND.TO trades at CA$10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs TC.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 296.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while TC.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs STC.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while STC.TO trades at CA$7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -26.69. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs PAY.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while PAY.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs GIVX.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while GIVX.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs HAI.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while HAI.TO trades at CA$4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs RAIL.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while RAIL.CN trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to RAIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs NC.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while NC.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs MOGO.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while MOGO.TO trades at CA$1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs SCPE.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while SCPE.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs PACT.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while PACT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs ICS.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while ICS.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs HANK.V Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while HANK.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs CYBT.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, CYBT.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while CYBT.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas CYBT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYBT.CN's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to CYBT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs IP.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while IP.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs NFTX.NE Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while NFTX.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +52.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs VPN.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, VPN.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while VPN.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas VPN.CN's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VPN.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to VPN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs EONX.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while EONX.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs PKK.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while PKK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs PERK.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while PERK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs OPT.TO Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while OPT.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is less volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs MBLM.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while MBLM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs SCYB.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while SCYB.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs BVCI.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs DSAI.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while DSAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs HRO.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while HRO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs APP.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while APP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs BYND.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while BYND.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs AMPD.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while AMPD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs SQID.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while SQID.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW.NE is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.NE.
PANW.NE vs EAP.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, EAP.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while EAP.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas EAP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EAP.CN's ROE of +20.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PANW.NE has daily volatility of 2.14 and EAP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
PANW.NE vs TAAL.CN Comparison
PANW.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW.NE stands at 178.7B. In comparison, TAAL.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PANW.NE is priced at CA$23.89, while TAAL.CN trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 113.76, whereas TAAL.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW.NE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TAAL.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PANW.NE has daily volatility of 2.14 and TAAL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.