Global X MSCI Pakistan ETF

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while SGENX trades at $88.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check SGENX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while FEGRX trades at $88.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check FEGRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while FESGX trades at $83.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check FESGX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while SGIIX trades at $88.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check SGIIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while APO trades at $118.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check APO's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while APO-PA trades at $62.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check APO-PA's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while GBLEX trades at $41.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check GBLEX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while AGVEX trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check AGVEX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while FSGGX trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check FSGGX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while MDLOX trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check MDLOX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while GLFOX trades at $20.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check GLFOX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while GLIFX trades at $20.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check GLIFX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PAVE trades at $55.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PAVE's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, LSITX has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while LSITX trades at $70.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas LSITX's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSITX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to LSITX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check LSITX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CGGO trades at $36.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CGGO's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JATAX trades at $64.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JATAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JATSX trades at $61.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JATSX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JNGTX trades at $68.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JNGTX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JATNX trades at $68.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JATNX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JAGTX trades at $67.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JAGTX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JATIX trades at $69.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JATIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check AAM-PB's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check AAM-PA's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while QYLD trades at $17.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check QYLD's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while IOO trades at $127.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check IOO's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PRGSX trades at $72.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PRGSX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PAGSX trades at $70.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PAGSX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while VHGEX trades at $38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check VHGEX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PGGFX trades at $27.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PGGFX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while DFGEX trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check DFGEX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JAGCX trades at $50.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JAGCX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while GUNR trades at $53.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check GUNR's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PRGTX trades at $27.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PRGTX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JFNCX trades at $68.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JFNCX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JFNIX trades at $82.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JFNIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JNGLX trades at $82.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JNGLX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JFNAX trades at $80.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JFNAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JFNNX trades at $82.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JFNNX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JFNSX trades at $77.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JFNSX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JAGLX trades at $81.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JAGLX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, URA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while URA trades at $53.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas URA's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to URA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check URA's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PRJQX trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PRJQX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PRJZX trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PRJZX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, SIL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while SIL trades at $103.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas SIL's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to SIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check SIL's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CMTFX trades at $111.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CMTFX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CTHRX trades at $114.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CTHRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CGTUX trades at $114.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CGTUX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CTHCX trades at $87.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CTHCX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CTCAX trades at $104.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CTCAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JDWNX trades at $122.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JDWNX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JWWCX trades at $118.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JWWCX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JDWAX trades at $125.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JDWAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JWWFX trades at $126.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JWWFX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JDWRX trades at $122.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JDWRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while REET trades at $26.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check REET's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while GNR trades at $73.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check GNR's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JWGRX trades at $125.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JWGRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JAWWX trades at $122.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JAWWX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, COPX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while COPX trades at $86.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas COPX's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to COPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check COPX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while VNQI trades at $50.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNQI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check VNQI's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, RING has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while RING trades at $90.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas RING's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RING's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to RING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check RING's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while DGSIX trades at $22.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check DGSIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CTYRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while IXJ trades at $100.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check IXJ's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while BGHIX trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check BGHIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while BOTZ trades at $38.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check BOTZ's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while ACWV trades at $123.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check ACWV's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while SGTTX trades at $105.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check SGTTX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while MGGPX trades at $31.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check MGGPX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CSGZX trades at $104.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CSGZX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while MGGIX trades at $34.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check MGGIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while DFGR trades at $28.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check DFGR's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while XYLD trades at $40.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check XYLD's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while APDGX trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check APDGX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while APHGX trades at $29.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check APHGX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while ARTGX trades at $29.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check ARTGX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, VGPMX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while VGPMX trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas VGPMX's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGPMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to VGPMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check VGPMX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while NFRA trades at $66.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check NFRA's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while GCOW trades at $46.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check GCOW's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while VGWLX trades at $29.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check VGWLX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while VGWAX trades at $37.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check VGWAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while MLPX trades at $69.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check MLPX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while LSWWX trades at $26.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check LSWWX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while LGMCX trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check LGMCX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while LGMAX trades at $25.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check LGMAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while SGTRX trades at $91.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check SGTRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JORIX trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JORIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while BIALX trades at $28.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check BIALX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JORAX trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JORAX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check CCHRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JORFX trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JORFX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JORNX trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JORNX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JSLNX trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JSLNX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JORRX trades at $19.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JORRX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while IILGX trades at $30.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check IILGX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while JORCX trades at $18.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check JORCX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while OPGIX trades at $53.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check OPGIX's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while PFFD trades at $19.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is more volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check PFFD's competition here

PAK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAK stands at 28.1M. In comparison, ICLN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAK is priced at $16.79, while ICLN trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.92, whereas ICLN's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, PAK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAK is less volatile compared to ICLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAK.Check ICLN's competition here