PT Adaro Energy Indonesia Tbk
PT Adaro Energy Indonesia Tbk PADEF Peers
See (PADEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PADEF | $0.12 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 6.00 | $0.02 | +13.99% |
| CSUAY | $17.72 | -0.34% | 105.4B | 11.29 | $1.57 | +6.00% |
| CUAEF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 95.1B | 10.26 | $0.39 | +7.80% |
| CCOZF | $1.18 | +0.00% | 19.3B | 6.56 | $0.18 | +5.67% |
| YZCAY | $11.80 | -2.16% | 15.8B | 6.38 | $1.85 | +8.88% |
| YZCHF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 5.56 | $0.18 | +10.66% |
| YACAF | $4.12 | -3.06% | 5.5B | 7.00 | $0.60 | +7.82% |
| IMYCF | $1.80 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 3.75 | $0.48 | N/A |
| HIIDQ | $0.91 | +0.59% | 4.2B | 0.16 | $5.54 | N/A |
| ADOOY | $6.32 | +10.68% | 3.8B | 7.26 | $0.87 | +77.96% |
Stock Comparison
PADEF vs CSUAY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSUAY has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CSUAY trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CSUAY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSUAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CSUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CUAEF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CUAEF has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CUAEF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CUAEF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CUAEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CUAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CCOZF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CCOZF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CCOZF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CCOZF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCOZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CCOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs YZCAY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, YZCAY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while YZCAY trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas YZCAY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YZCAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to YZCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs YZCHF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, YZCHF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while YZCHF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas YZCHF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YZCHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to YZCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs YACAF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, YACAF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while YACAF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas YACAF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YACAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to YACAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs IMYCF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMYCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while IMYCF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas IMYCF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to IMYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs HIIDQ Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HIIDQ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while HIIDQ trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HIIDQ's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIIDQ's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to HIIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs ADOOY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADOOY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while ADOOY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ADOOY's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADOOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to ADOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs WHITF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WHITF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while WHITF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WHITF's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHITF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to WHITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs EXXAF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EXXAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while EXXAF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EXXAF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXXAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to EXXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs NHPEF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NHPEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while NHPEF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NHPEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHPEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to NHPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs PBMRY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PBMRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while PBMRY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PBMRY's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBMRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to PBMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs PBATF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PBATF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while PBATF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PBATF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBATF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to PBATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs TBNGY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TBNGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while TBNGY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TBNGY's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to TBNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs FSHYF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FSHYF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while FSHYF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FSHYF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSHYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to FSHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs ITAYY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ITAYY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while ITAYY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ITAYY's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITAYY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to ITAYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs PTIZF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PTIZF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while PTIZF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTIZF's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to PTIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs STMRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STMRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while STMRF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas STMRF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to STMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs MOGLF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MOGLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while MOGLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MOGLF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOGLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to MOGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CCOZY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CCOZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CCOZY trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CCOZY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCOZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CCOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs TNGRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TNGRF has a market cap of 754.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while TNGRF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TNGRF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNGRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to TNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs BRNE Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRNE has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while BRNE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BRNE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRNE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to BRNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs GRYRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GRYRF has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while GRYRF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GRYRF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRYRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to GRYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CCARF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CCARF has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CCARF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CCARF's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCARF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CCARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CODQL Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CODQL has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CODQL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CODQL's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CODQL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CODQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs SGQRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SGQRF has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while SGQRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SGQRF's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGQRF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to SGQRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs BTURF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BTURF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while BTURF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BTURF's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTURF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to BTURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs PBMRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PBMRF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while PBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PBMRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBMRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to PBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs TERCF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TERCF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while TERCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TERCF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TERCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to TERCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs WRLC Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRLC has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while WRLC trades at $440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WRLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to WRLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs BNPJY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BNPJY has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while BNPJY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BNPJY's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNPJY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to BNPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs ARECW Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ARECW has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while ARECW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ARECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARECW's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to ARECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs FSHRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FSHRF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while FSHRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FSHRF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSHRF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to FSHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs GCLMF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GCLMF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while GCLMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GCLMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCLMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to GCLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs FBMCF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FBMCF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while FBMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FBMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FBMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to FBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CRSXF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRSXF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CRSXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CRSXF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRSXF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CRSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs WECFF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WECFF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while WECFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WECFF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WECFF's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to WECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs MOAEF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MOAEF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while MOAEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MOAEF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOAEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to MOAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs APMCF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, APMCF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while APMCF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas APMCF's P/E ratio is -24.99. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APMCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to APMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CAFZF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CAFZF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CAFZF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CAFZF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to CAFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs ROYE Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ROYE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while ROYE trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ROYE's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROYE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to ROYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs ALGCF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALGCF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while ALGCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ALGCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to ALGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs AJLGF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AJLGF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while AJLGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AJLGF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AJLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to AJLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs MOAEY Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MOAEY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while MOAEY trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MOAEY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOAEY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to MOAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs KALG Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KALG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while KALG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KALG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KALG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is less volatile compared to KALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs PVMCF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PVMCF has a market cap of 393.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while PVMCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PVMCF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PVMCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to PVMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs FDGMF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FDGMF has a market cap of 248K. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while FDGMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas FDGMF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FDGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to FDGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs SHGP Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SHGP has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while SHGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to SHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs AEXE Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AEXE has a market cap of 145.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while AEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AEXE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEXE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to AEXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs CERX Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CERX has a market cap of 536. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while CERX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CERX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CERX's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to CERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.
PADEF vs BGNRF Comparison
PADEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PADEF stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BGNRF has a market cap of 86. Regarding current trading prices, PADEF is priced at $0.12, while BGNRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PADEF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BGNRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PADEF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGNRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PADEF is more volatile compared to BGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PADEF.