Pacton Gold Inc.
Pacton Gold Inc. (PACXF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PACXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACXF | $0.09 | +0.00% | 5.3M | -0.95 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.82 | -0.18% | 73.2B | 14.95 | $0.19 | +1.86% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +804.81% |
| GFIOF | $25.38 | +0.00% | 22.7B | 18.39 | $1.38 | +2.15% |
| NESRF | $10.80 | +4.75% | 15.1B | 19.63 | $0.54 | +3.13% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $46.42 | +0.66% | 11.4B | 21.34 | $2.22 | +3.30% |
| CAHPF | $4.84 | +2.54% | 9.7B | 21.04 | $0.23 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
PACXF vs ZIJMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ZIJMF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ZIJMF's competition here
PACXF vs OPYGY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPYGY's competition here
PACXF vs GFIOF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while GFIOF trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check GFIOF's competition here
PACXF vs NESRF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while NESRF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check NESRF's competition here
PACXF vs NSTYY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTYY's competition here
PACXF vs NCMGY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check NCMGY's competition here
PACXF vs NCMGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check NCMGF's competition here
PACXF vs LUGDF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while LUGDF trades at $46.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check LUGDF's competition here
PACXF vs CAHPF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while CAHPF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check CAHPF's competition here
PACXF vs HGMCF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGMCF's competition here
PACXF vs ZHAOF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ZHAOF's competition here
PACXF vs AULGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AULGF's competition here
PACXF vs EDVMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while EDVMF trades at $30.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -74.38. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check EDVMF's competition here
PACXF vs SBYSF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SBYSF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and SBYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBYSF's competition here
PACXF vs ARGTF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ARGTF trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -271.26. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ARGTF's competition here
PACXF vs ZIJMY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ZIJMY trades at $56.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ZIJMY's competition here
PACXF vs DGMLF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check DGMLF's competition here
PACXF vs OCANF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OCANF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check OCANF's competition here
PACXF vs PMNXF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while PMNXF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check PMNXF's competition here
PACXF vs GRLGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check GRLGF's competition here
PACXF vs DPMLF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while DPMLF trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check DPMLF's competition here
PACXF vs GSISF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while GSISF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSISF's competition here
PACXF vs KNTNF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while KNTNF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check KNTNF's competition here
PACXF vs TORXF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while TORXF trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check TORXF's competition here
PACXF vs CRNLF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while CRNLF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check CRNLF's competition here
PACXF vs ELKMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ELKMF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ELKMF's competition here
PACXF vs CELTF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CELTF's competition here
PACXF vs RGRNF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RGRNF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -283.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RGRNF's competition here
PACXF vs RMLRF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RMLRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RMLRF's competition here
PACXF vs ORAAF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ORAAF's competition here
PACXF vs KOZAY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check KOZAY's competition here
PACXF vs HCHDF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while HCHDF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and HCHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHDF's competition here
PACXF vs WDOFF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while WDOFF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check WDOFF's competition here
PACXF vs CXBMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check CXBMF's competition here
PACXF vs REDLF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while REDLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check REDLF's competition here
PACXF vs WFRSF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFRSF's competition here
PACXF vs EOGSF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while EOGSF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check EOGSF's competition here
PACXF vs OBNNF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check OBNNF's competition here
PACXF vs PAFRF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check PAFRF's competition here
PACXF vs DRDGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while DRDGF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check DRDGF's competition here
PACXF vs MAUTF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MAUTF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MAUTF's competition here
PACXF vs AURQF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AURQF's competition here
PACXF vs SNWGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SNWGF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -47.14. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check SNWGF's competition here
PACXF vs MWSNF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 940.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MWSNF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -72.87. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MWSNF's competition here
PACXF vs RMGGY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 932.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RMGGY trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -33.69. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and RMGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMGGY's competition here
PACXF vs HCHDY Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHDY's competition here
PACXF vs SVLKF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVLKF's competition here
PACXF vs SGSVF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check SGSVF's competition here
PACXF vs KRRGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check KRRGF's competition here
PACXF vs BELGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 841.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while BELGF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check BELGF's competition here
PACXF vs RUPRF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 837.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RUPRF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -179.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RUPRF's competition here
PACXF vs RMGGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 830.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RMGGF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RMGGF's competition here
PACXF vs PDIYF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 746.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -28.46. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check PDIYF's competition here
PACXF vs WTGRF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check WTGRF's competition here
PACXF vs RGDFF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RGDFF's competition here
PACXF vs ASGOF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 601.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ASGOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and ASGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGOF's competition here
PACXF vs MNSAF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 560.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MNSAF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MNSAF's competition here
PACXF vs NVMLF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check NVMLF's competition here
PACXF vs OSKA Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check OSKA's competition here
PACXF vs GUYGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 482.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while GUYGF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check GUYGF's competition here
PACXF vs RSRBF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 475.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RSRBF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 81.67. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RSRBF's competition here
PACXF vs RIOFF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 470.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RIOFF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 110.65. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RIOFF's competition here
PACXF vs ARNGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ARNGF's competition here
PACXF vs RMLFF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 461.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while RMLFF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check RMLFF's competition here
PACXF vs GDRZF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 455.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while GDRZF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check GDRZF's competition here
PACXF vs ECRTF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ECRTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and ECRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECRTF's competition here
PACXF vs ORZCF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ORZCF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ORZCF's competition here
PACXF vs KSKGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while KSKGF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check KSKGF's competition here
PACXF vs NRGOF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, NRGOF has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while NRGOF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas NRGOF's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to NRGOF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to NRGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check NRGOF's competition here
PACXF vs LMGDF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check LMGDF's competition here
PACXF vs ELEMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 366.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ELEMF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ELEMF's competition here
PACXF vs THXPF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while THXPF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check THXPF's competition here
PACXF vs TPRXF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check TPRXF's competition here
PACXF vs MNDJF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 342.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MNDJF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MNDJF's competition here
PACXF vs MAKOF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MAKOF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MAKOF's competition here
PACXF vs PROBF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while PROBF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check PROBF's competition here
PACXF vs OMGGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 322.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OMGGF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -27.19. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check OMGGF's competition here
PACXF vs OGNRF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check OGNRF's competition here
PACXF vs ALKEF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 287.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and ALKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALKEF's competition here
PACXF vs AGXKF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while AGXKF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check AGXKF's competition here
PACXF vs MGDPF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MGDPF's competition here
PACXF vs OSIIF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSIIF's competition here
PACXF vs ERRSF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check ERRSF's competition here
PACXF vs FDMIF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 230.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while FDMIF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check FDMIF's competition here
PACXF vs STPGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 222.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while STPGF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check STPGF's competition here
PACXF vs JAGGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while JAGGF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -34.87. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check JAGGF's competition here
PACXF vs GGAZF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while GGAZF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check GGAZF's competition here
PACXF vs HSTXF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 205.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while HSTXF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check HSTXF's competition here
PACXF vs WRLGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while WRLGF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check WRLGF's competition here
PACXF vs STBMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while STBMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STBMF's competition here
PACXF vs SAAGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAAGF's competition here
PACXF vs CNLMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check CNLMF's competition here
PACXF vs MAIFF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while MAIFF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check MAIFF's competition here
PACXF vs SITKF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SITKF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -49.14. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check SITKF's competition here
PACXF vs DCCNF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCCNF's competition here
PACXF vs CNMXF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check CNMXF's competition here
PACXF vs SRBIF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while SRBIF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check SRBIF's competition here
PACXF vs THSGF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while THSGF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACXF.Check THSGF's competition here
PACXF vs EEYMF Comparison July 2025
PACXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACXF stands at 5.3M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PACXF is priced at $0.09, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACXF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.95, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PACXF's ROE is N/A, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PACXF and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EEYMF's competition here