Xtrackers MSCI Latin America Pacific Alliance ETF
Xtrackers MSCI Latin America Pacific Alliance ETF (PACA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PACA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACA | $17.45 | -22.28% | 1.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APO | $145.32 | -0.10% | 83.1B | 25.33 | $5.74 | +1.29% |
| FEGRX | $77.14 | -1.09% | 62.3B | 17.92 | $4.31 | N/A |
| SGIIX | $77.09 | -1.09% | 62.3B | 18.43 | $4.19 | N/A |
| SGENX | $76.53 | -1.10% | 61.6B | 17.92 | $4.27 | N/A |
| FESGX | $72.74 | -1.10% | 61.6B | 18.39 | $3.96 | N/A |
| APO-PA | $76.18 | +0.13% | 43.5B | 9.14 | $8.32 | +1.29% |
| GBLEX | $39.77 | -0.60% | 28B | 20.65 | $1.93 | N/A |
| AGVEX | $26.39 | -0.86% | 17.3B | 26.52 | $1.00 | N/A |
| MDLOX | $19.43 | -0.46% | 16.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PACA vs APO Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, APO has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while APO trades at $145.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APO's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to APO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check APO's competition here
PACA vs FEGRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, FEGRX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while FEGRX trades at $77.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEGRX's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FEGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to FEGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check FEGRX's competition here
PACA vs SGIIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, SGIIX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while SGIIX trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIIX's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGIIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to SGIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check SGIIX's competition here
PACA vs SGENX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, SGENX has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while SGENX trades at $76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGENX's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGENX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to SGENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check SGENX's competition here
PACA vs FESGX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, FESGX has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while FESGX trades at $72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FESGX's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FESGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to FESGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check FESGX's competition here
PACA vs APO-PA Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, APO-PA has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while APO-PA trades at $76.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APO-PA's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APO-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to APO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check APO-PA's competition here
PACA vs GBLEX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, GBLEX has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while GBLEX trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLEX's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to GBLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check GBLEX's competition here
PACA vs AGVEX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, AGVEX has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while AGVEX trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGVEX's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGVEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to AGVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check AGVEX's competition here
PACA vs MDLOX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MDLOX has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MDLOX trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MDLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MDLOX's competition here
PACA vs FSGGX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, FSGGX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while FSGGX trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSGGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSGGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to FSGGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check FSGGX's competition here
PACA vs GLIFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, GLIFX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while GLIFX trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLIFX's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to GLIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check GLIFX's competition here
PACA vs GLFOX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, GLFOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while GLFOX trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLFOX's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLFOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to GLFOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check GLFOX's competition here
PACA vs AAM-PA Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, AAM-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while AAM-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAM-PA's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to AAM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check AAM-PA's competition here
PACA vs AAM-PB Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, AAM-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while AAM-PB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAM-PB's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAM-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to AAM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check AAM-PB's competition here
PACA vs PAVE Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PAVE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PAVE trades at $45.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVE's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAVE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PAVE's competition here
PACA vs QYLD Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, QYLD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while QYLD trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLD's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to QYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check QYLD's competition here
PACA vs VHGEX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, VHGEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while VHGEX trades at $39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHGEX's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHGEX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to VHGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check VHGEX's competition here
PACA vs JAGCX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JAGCX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JAGCX trades at $56.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JAGCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JAGCX's competition here
PACA vs JATIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JATIX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JATIX trades at $75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JATIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JATIX's competition here
PACA vs JATSX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JATSX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JATSX trades at $67.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JATSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JATSX's competition here
PACA vs JNGTX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JNGTX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JNGTX trades at $73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JNGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JNGTX's competition here
PACA vs JATAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JATAX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JATAX trades at $70.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JATAX's competition here
PACA vs JAGTX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JAGTX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JAGTX trades at $72.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JAGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JAGTX's competition here
PACA vs JATNX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JATNX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JATNX trades at $74.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JATNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JATNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JATNX's competition here
PACA vs DFGEX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, DFGEX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while DFGEX trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFGEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to DFGEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check DFGEX's competition here
PACA vs PRGSX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PRGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PRGSX trades at $68.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGSX's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PRGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PRGSX's competition here
PACA vs PAGSX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PAGSX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PAGSX trades at $67.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGSX's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PAGSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PAGSX's competition here
PACA vs PGGFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PGGFX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PGGFX trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGGFX's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PGGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PGGFX's competition here
PACA vs PRJZX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PRJZX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PRJZX trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRJZX's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PRJZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PRJZX's competition here
PACA vs PRJQX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PRJQX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PRJQX trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRJQX's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRJQX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PRJQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PRJQX's competition here
PACA vs CGGO Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CGGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CGGO trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGO's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CGGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CGGO's competition here
PACA vs ACWV Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, ACWV has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while ACWV trades at $116.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACWV's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to ACWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check ACWV's competition here
PACA vs JDWNX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JDWNX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JDWNX trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWNX's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JDWNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JDWNX's competition here
PACA vs PRGTX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PRGTX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PRGTX trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGTX's P/E ratio is 44.33. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRGTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PRGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PRGTX's competition here
PACA vs IOO Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, IOO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while IOO trades at $111.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOO's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to IOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check IOO's competition here
PACA vs GUNR Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, GUNR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while GUNR trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUNR's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to GUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check GUNR's competition here
PACA vs JNGLX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JNGLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JNGLX trades at $65.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JNGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JNGLX's competition here
PACA vs JAGLX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JAGLX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JAGLX trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JAGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JAGLX's competition here
PACA vs JFNCX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JFNCX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JFNCX trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JFNCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JFNCX's competition here
PACA vs JFNNX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JFNNX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JFNNX trades at $65.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JFNNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JFNNX's competition here
PACA vs JFNAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JFNAX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JFNAX trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JFNAX's competition here
PACA vs JFNIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JFNIX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JFNIX trades at $65.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JFNIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JFNIX's competition here
PACA vs JFNSX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JFNSX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JFNSX trades at $61.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFNSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JFNSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JFNSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JFNSX's competition here
PACA vs JWGRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JWGRX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JWGRX trades at $126.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWGRX's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JWGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JWGRX's competition here
PACA vs JDWAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JDWAX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JDWAX trades at $126.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWAX's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JDWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JDWAX's competition here
PACA vs JWWCX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JWWCX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JWWCX trades at $119.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWWCX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JWWCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JWWCX's competition here
PACA vs JAWWX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JAWWX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JAWWX trades at $124.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAWWX's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JAWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JAWWX's competition here
PACA vs JDWRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JDWRX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JDWRX trades at $124.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDWRX's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDWRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JDWRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JDWRX's competition here
PACA vs JWWFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JWWFX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JWWFX trades at $127.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWWFX's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWWFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JWWFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JWWFX's competition here
PACA vs REET Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, REET has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while REET trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REET's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to REET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check REET's competition here
PACA vs CGTUX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CGTUX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CGTUX trades at $107.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGTUX's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGTUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CGTUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CGTUX's competition here
PACA vs CTCAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CTCAX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CTCAX trades at $98.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTCAX's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTCAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CTCAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CTCAX's competition here
PACA vs CMTFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CMTFX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CMTFX trades at $104.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTFX's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMTFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CMTFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CMTFX's competition here
PACA vs CTHCX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CTHCX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CTHCX trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHCX's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CTHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CTHCX's competition here
PACA vs CTHRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CTHRX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CTHRX trades at $106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHRX's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CTHRX's competition here
PACA vs URA Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, URA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while URA trades at $39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URA's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to URA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check URA's competition here
PACA vs VNQI Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, VNQI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while VNQI trades at $45.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNQI's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNQI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to VNQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check VNQI's competition here
PACA vs CTYRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CTYRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CTYRX trades at $92.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTYRX's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTYRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CTYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CTYRX's competition here
PACA vs DGSIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, DGSIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while DGSIX trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGSIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGSIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to DGSIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check DGSIX's competition here
PACA vs BGHIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, BGHIX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while BGHIX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BGHIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to BGHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check BGHIX's competition here
PACA vs MGGPX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MGGPX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MGGPX trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MGGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MGGPX's competition here
PACA vs MGGIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MGGIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MGGIX trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MGGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MGGIX's competition here
PACA vs XYLD Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, XYLD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while XYLD trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYLD's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to XYLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check XYLD's competition here
PACA vs IXJ Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, IXJ has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while IXJ trades at $83.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXJ's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to IXJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check IXJ's competition here
PACA vs LSWWX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, LSWWX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while LSWWX trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSWWX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LSWWX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to LSWWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check LSWWX's competition here
PACA vs LGMAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, LGMAX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while LGMAX trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to LGMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check LGMAX's competition here
PACA vs LGMCX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, LGMCX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while LGMCX trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGMCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGMCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to LGMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check LGMCX's competition here
PACA vs APHGX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, APHGX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while APHGX trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APHGX's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APHGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to APHGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check APHGX's competition here
PACA vs ARTGX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, ARTGX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while ARTGX trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTGX's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to ARTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check ARTGX's competition here
PACA vs APDGX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, APDGX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while APDGX trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APDGX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APDGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to APDGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check APDGX's competition here
PACA vs NFRA Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, NFRA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while NFRA trades at $60.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFRA's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFRA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to NFRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check NFRA's competition here
PACA vs GNR Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, GNR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while GNR trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNR's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to GNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check GNR's competition here
PACA vs MSFBX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MSFBX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MSFBX trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFBX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MSFBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MSFBX's competition here
PACA vs MSFLX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MSFLX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MSFLX trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MSFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MSFLX's competition here
PACA vs BOTZ Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, BOTZ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while BOTZ trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOTZ's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOTZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to BOTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check BOTZ's competition here
PACA vs MLPX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MLPX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MLPX trades at $62.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLPX's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MLPX's competition here
PACA vs CCHRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CCHRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CCHRX trades at $87.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHRX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CCHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CCHRX's competition here
PACA vs VGWLX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, VGWLX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while VGWLX trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWLX's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to VGWLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check VGWLX's competition here
PACA vs VGWAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, VGWAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while VGWAX trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWAX's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to VGWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check VGWAX's competition here
PACA vs JORIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JORIX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JORIX trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORIX's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JORIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JORIX's competition here
PACA vs JORAX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JORAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JORAX trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORAX's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JORAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JORAX's competition here
PACA vs JORFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JORFX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JORFX trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORFX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JORFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JORFX's competition here
PACA vs CSGZX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, CSGZX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while CSGZX trades at $83.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGZX's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGZX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to CSGZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check CSGZX's competition here
PACA vs SGTTX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, SGTTX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while SGTTX trades at $84.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGTTX's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to SGTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check SGTTX's competition here
PACA vs JORNX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JORNX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JORNX trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORNX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JORNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JORNX's competition here
PACA vs JSLNX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JSLNX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JSLNX trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSLNX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSLNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JSLNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JSLNX's competition here
PACA vs OPGIX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, OPGIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while OPGIX trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPGIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPGIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to OPGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check OPGIX's competition here
PACA vs JORRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JORRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JORRX trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORRX's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JORRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JORRX's competition here
PACA vs DFGR Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, DFGR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while DFGR trades at $26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFGR's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to DFGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check DFGR's competition here
PACA vs BIALX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, BIALX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while BIALX trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIALX's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BIALX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to BIALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check BIALX's competition here
PACA vs JORCX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, JORCX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while JORCX trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JORCX's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JORCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to JORCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check JORCX's competition here
PACA vs FTGC Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, FTGC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while FTGC trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to FTGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check FTGC's competition here
PACA vs GCOW Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, GCOW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while GCOW trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCOW's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to GCOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check GCOW's competition here
PACA vs SGTRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, SGTRX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while SGTRX trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGTRX's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to SGTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check SGTRX's competition here
PACA vs PFFD Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, PFFD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while PFFD trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFFD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to PFFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check PFFD's competition here
PACA vs MWEFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, MWEFX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while MWEFX trades at $46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWEFX's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MWEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to MWEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check MWEFX's competition here
PACA vs IILGX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, IILGX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while IILGX trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IILGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IILGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to IILGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check IILGX's competition here
PACA vs ARTRX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, ARTRX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while ARTRX trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTRX's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to ARTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check ARTRX's competition here
PACA vs VMVFX Comparison August 2025
PACA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PACA stands at 1.7M. In comparison, VMVFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PACA is priced at $17.45, while VMVFX trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PACA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMVFX's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, PACA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMVFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PACA is more volatile compared to VMVFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PACA.Check VMVFX's competition here