Opsens Inc.

OPS.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OPS.TO stands at 334.89M. In comparison, BLCO.TO has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, OPS.TO is priced at $2.90, while BLCO.TO trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -26.32, whereas BLCO.TO's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, OPS.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BLCO.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OPS.TO is less volatile compared to BLCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPS.TO.

OPS.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OPS.TO stands at 334.89M. In comparison, HTL.TO has a market cap of 345.34M. Regarding current trading prices, OPS.TO is priced at $2.90, while HTL.TO trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -26.32, whereas HTL.TO's P/E ratio is -112.00. In terms of profitability, OPS.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HTL.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OPS.TO is more volatile compared to HTL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPS.TO.

OPS.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OPS.TO stands at 334.89M. In comparison, BLMH.CN has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, OPS.TO is priced at $2.90, while BLMH.CN trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -26.32, whereas BLMH.CN's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, OPS.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BLMH.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OPS.TO is more volatile compared to BLMH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPS.TO.

OPS.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OPS.TO stands at 334.89M. In comparison, TEVO.CN has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, OPS.TO is priced at $2.90, while TEVO.CN trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -26.32, whereas TEVO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, OPS.TO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TEVO.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OPS.TO is more volatile compared to TEVO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPS.TO.