Ocean Outdoor Limited
Ocean Outdoor Limited OOUT.L Peers
See (OOUT.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOUT.L | $10.20 | +1.29% | N/A | -15.09 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| WPP.L | $596.80 | -0.73% | 6.44B | 12.18 | $0.49 | +6.60% |
| ASCL.L | $567.50 | +0.09% | 1.17B | 47.29 | $0.12 | +38.52% |
| FOUR.L | $3,490.00 | -0.57% | 980.09M | 11.19 | $3.12 | +7.34% |
| NFC.L | $799.00 | -3.03% | 787.05M | -9.74 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| YOU.L | $317.00 | +0.96% | 371.13M | 317.00 | $0.01 | +2.84% |
| TRMR.L | $201.20 | +1.82% | 293.13M | -18.29 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| NFG.L | $286.00 | -1.72% | 288.65M | 7.53 | $0.38 | +5.37% |
| NEXN.L | $403.00 | +4.00% | 257.19M | 28.79 | $0.14 | N/A |
| 0N7I.L | $1.80 | N/A | 241.89M | N/A | N/A | +4.78% |
Stock Comparison
OOUT.L vs WPP.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, WPP.L has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while WPP.L trades at $596.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas WPP.L's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WPP.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to WPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs ASCL.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ASCL.L has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while ASCL.L trades at $567.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas ASCL.L's P/E ratio is 47.29. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASCL.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to ASCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs FOUR.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FOUR.L has a market cap of 980.09M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while FOUR.L trades at $3,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas FOUR.L's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FOUR.L's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to FOUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs NFC.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NFC.L has a market cap of 787.05M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while NFC.L trades at $799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas NFC.L's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NFC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to NFC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs YOU.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, YOU.L has a market cap of 371.13M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while YOU.L trades at $317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas YOU.L's P/E ratio is 317.00. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YOU.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to YOU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs TRMR.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TRMR.L has a market cap of 293.13M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while TRMR.L trades at $201.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas TRMR.L's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TRMR.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to TRMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs NFG.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NFG.L has a market cap of 288.65M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while NFG.L trades at $286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas NFG.L's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NFG.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to NFG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs NEXN.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NEXN.L has a market cap of 257.19M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while NEXN.L trades at $403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas NEXN.L's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NEXN.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to NEXN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs 0N7I.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0N7I.L has a market cap of 241.89M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while 0N7I.L trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas 0N7I.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to 0N7I.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to 0N7I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs SAA.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SAA.L has a market cap of 201.11M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while SAA.L trades at $164.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas SAA.L's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SAA.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to SAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs SFOR.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SFOR.L has a market cap of 165.40M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while SFOR.L trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas SFOR.L's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SFOR.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to SFOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs SYS1.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SYS1.L has a market cap of 57.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while SYS1.L trades at $450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas SYS1.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SYS1.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to SYS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs PEBB.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PEBB.L has a market cap of 54.63M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while PEBB.L trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas PEBB.L's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PEBB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to PEBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs CAU.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CAU.L has a market cap of 43.47M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while CAU.L trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas CAU.L's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CAU.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to CAU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs EBQ.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EBQ.L has a market cap of 33.89M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while EBQ.L trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas EBQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EBQ.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to EBQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs NAH.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NAH.L has a market cap of 28.85M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while NAH.L trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas NAH.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NAH.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to NAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs TMG.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, TMG.L has a market cap of 23.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while TMG.L trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas TMG.L's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to TMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs DNM.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DNM.L has a market cap of 10.21M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while DNM.L trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas DNM.L's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DNM.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to DNM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs SBDS.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SBDS.L has a market cap of 6.47M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while SBDS.L trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas SBDS.L's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SBDS.L's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to SBDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs SAL.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SAL.L has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while SAL.L trades at $117.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas SAL.L's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SAL.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to SAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs MDZ.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MDZ.L has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while MDZ.L trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas MDZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MDZ.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to MDZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs GVMH.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GVMH.L has a market cap of 938799.00. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while GVMH.L trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas GVMH.L's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GVMH.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to GVMH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs ICON.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ICON.L has a market cap of 585979.00. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while ICON.L trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas ICON.L's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ICON.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is more volatile compared to ICON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs JWNG.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, JWNG.L has a market cap of 396664.00. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while JWNG.L trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas JWNG.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JWNG.L's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to JWNG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.
OOUT.L vs MIRI.L Comparison
OOUT.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOUT.L stands at N/A. In comparison, MIRI.L has a market cap of 237049.00. Regarding current trading prices, OOUT.L is priced at $10.20, while MIRI.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOUT.L currently has a P/E ratio of -15.09, whereas MIRI.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OOUT.L's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MIRI.L's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OOUT.L is less volatile compared to MIRI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOUT.L.