Okmin Resources, Inc.
Okmin Resources, Inc. (OKMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OKMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OKMN | $0.04 | +0.00% | 4.7M | -4.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PCCYF | $0.97 | -1.02% | 214B | 7.44 | $0.13 | +6.77% |
| RYDAF | $35.43 | -1.46% | 202.1B | 15.46 | $2.24 | +3.81% |
| TTFNF | $63.51 | -1.95% | 139.9B | 11.51 | $5.52 | +5.56% |
| BPAQF | $5.58 | -2.70% | 88B | 142.25 | $0.04 | +5.65% |
| SNPMF | $0.52 | -8.13% | 85B | 13.05 | $0.04 | +7.63% |
| OMVKY | $13.95 | -2.92% | 73.1B | 18.89 | $0.74 | +9.38% |
| RNFTF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 64.8B | 2.65 | $1.54 | N/A |
| STOHF | $25.40 | +1.60% | 64.4B | 8.41 | $3.02 | +9.25% |
| EIPAF | $17.20 | -8.07% | 50.6B | 20.00 | $0.86 | +6.35% |
Stock Comparison
OKMN vs PCCYF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 214B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PCCYF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PCCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PCCYF's competition here
OKMN vs RYDAF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while RYDAF trades at $35.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check RYDAF's competition here
OKMN vs TTFNF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while TTFNF trades at $63.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check TTFNF's competition here
OKMN vs BPAQF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while BPAQF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 142.25. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check BPAQF's competition here
OKMN vs SNPMF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while SNPMF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SNPMF's competition here
OKMN vs OMVKY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while OMVKY trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OMVKY's competition here
OKMN vs RNFTF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to RNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check RNFTF's competition here
OKMN vs STOHF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while STOHF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to STOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check STOHF's competition here
OKMN vs EIPAF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while EIPAF trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check EIPAF's competition here
OKMN vs LUKOY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check LUKOY's competition here
OKMN vs PETFF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PETFF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PETFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PETFF's competition here
OKMN vs GLPEY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while GLPEY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check GLPEY's competition here
OKMN vs PUTRY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PUTRY's competition here
OKMN vs PUTRF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PUTRF's competition here
OKMN vs PSKOF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PSKOF trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PSKOF's competition here
OKMN vs REPYY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while REPYY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check REPYY's competition here
OKMN vs REPYF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while REPYF trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check REPYF's competition here
OKMN vs OMVJF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while OMVJF trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OMVJF's competition here
OKMN vs OGFGY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while OGFGY trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OGFGY's competition here
OKMN vs GLPEF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while GLPEF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check GLPEF's competition here
OKMN vs OGFGF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while OGFGF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OGFGF's competition here
OKMN vs MGYOY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while MGYOY trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check MGYOY's competition here
OKMN vs OAOFY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OAOFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while OAOFY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OAOFY's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OAOFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to OAOFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OAOFY's competition here
OKMN vs SLTQY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SLTQY's competition here
OKMN vs HLPMF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check HLPMF's competition here
OKMN vs ISRMF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check ISRMF's competition here
OKMN vs RTEXF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to RTEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check RTEXF's competition here
OKMN vs WDGJY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check WDGJY's competition here
OKMN vs UNTC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while UNTC trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check UNTC's competition here
OKMN vs WDGJF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while WDGJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check WDGJF's competition here
OKMN vs PXPEF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PXPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PXPEF's competition here
OKMN vs SEGYY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SEGYY's competition here
OKMN vs UNTCW Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while UNTCW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check UNTCW's competition here
OKMN vs ECTM Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while ECTM trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check ECTM's competition here
OKMN vs GRGUF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check GRGUF's competition here
OKMN vs POGS Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 639.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while POGS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check POGS's competition here
OKMN vs AEDC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while AEDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check AEDC's competition here
OKMN vs TRNX Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while TRNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to TRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check TRNX's competition here
OKMN vs PEMC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 29K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PEMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PEMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PEMC's competition here
OKMN vs SNVP Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while SNVP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SNVP's competition here
OKMN vs FRMC Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while FRMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check FRMC's competition here
OKMN vs PGAS Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while PGAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to PGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check PGAS's competition here
OKMN vs BNXR Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while BNXR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to BNXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check BNXR's competition here
OKMN vs AMNE Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while AMNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check AMNE's competition here
OKMN vs NUSPQ Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check NUSPQ's competition here
OKMN vs RRRI Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while RRRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check RRRI's competition here
OKMN vs VCOGF Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to VCOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check VCOGF's competition here
OKMN vs OJSCY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to OJSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check OJSCY's competition here
OKMN vs POGWY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while POGWY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to POGWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check POGWY's competition here
OKMN vs SNPTY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SNPTY's competition here
OKMN vs SGTZY Comparison August 2025
OKMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OKMN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OKMN is priced at $0.04, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OKMN currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, OKMN's ROE is +3.18%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OKMN is more volatile compared to SGTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OKMN.Check SGTZY's competition here