OFS Capital Corporation

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VFINX trades at $586.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VFINX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VOO trades at $581.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VOO's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VITSX trades at $151.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VITSX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTSAX trades at $151.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTSAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 681.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FXAIX trades at $220.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FXAIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 648.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while IVV trades at $635.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check IVV's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 647.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTI trades at $311.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTI's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 583.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while SPY trades at $632.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check SPY's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 505.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTSNX trades at $149.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTSNX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 504.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VXUS trades at $69.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VXUS's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 356.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VMCPX trades at $383.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VMCPX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 327B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VIMAX trades at $352.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VIMAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VIIIX trades at $516.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VIIIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VINIX trades at $516.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VINIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 298.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RGAGX trades at $84.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RGAGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 297.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while GAFFX trades at $84.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check GAFFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 297.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AGTHX trades at $83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AGTHX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 294.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while GFAFX trades at $83.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check GFAFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 264B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RGABX trades at $74.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RGABX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 259.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RGAAX trades at $73.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RGAAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 253.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while GFACX trades at $71.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check GFACX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AFMBX trades at $37.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AFMBX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while ABALX trades at $37.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check ABALX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while BALFX trades at $37.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check BALFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AMBFX trades at $37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AMBFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 253B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RLBGX trades at $37.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RLBGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 230.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTMNX trades at $18.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTMNX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 230.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VDIPX trades at $28.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VDIPX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 229.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VEA trades at $57.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VEA's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while QQQ trades at $567.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check QQQ's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VB trades at $240.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VB's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 204.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while BX trades at $169.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check BX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 196.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTV trades at $177.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTV's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VO trades at $284.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VO's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while BLK trades at $1,120.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check BLK's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FCNTX trades at $24.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FCNTX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FCNKX trades at $24.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FCNKX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while C-PN trades at $29.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check C-PN's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FCTDX trades at $18.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FCTDX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RICBX trades at $63.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RICBX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RICAX trades at $63.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RICAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AICFX trades at $63.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AICFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AIVSX trades at $64.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AIVSX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AICCX trades at $63.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AICCX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while ANWPX trades at $70.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check ANWPX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while NPFFX trades at $69.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check NPFFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FNPFX trades at $70.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FNPFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RNPGX trades at $70.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RNPGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while CFNAX trades at $88.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check CFNAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while ANCFX trades at $89.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check ANCFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AFIFX trades at $89.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AFIFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AWSHX trades at $64.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AWSHX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RWMFX trades at $64.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RWMFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FWMIX trades at $64.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FWMIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while CWMAX trades at $64.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check CWMAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 144.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while WSHFX trades at $64.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check WSHFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while WSHCX trades at $63.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check WSHCX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RWMBX trades at $63.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RWMBX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while IEFA trades at $83.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check IEFA's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AEGFX trades at $60.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AEGFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RERGX trades at $60.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RERGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AEPFX trades at $60.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AEPFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RERHX trades at $60.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RERHX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AEPGX trades at $60.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AEPGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AGG trades at $99.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 126.30. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AGG's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while KKR trades at $144.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 66.46. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check KKR's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while IWF trades at $442.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 38.15. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check IWF's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while SEEGX trades at $87.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check SEEGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while JLGMX trades at $92.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check JLGMX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while JLGRX trades at $90.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check JLGRX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VWENX trades at $79.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VWENX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VWELX trades at $46.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VWELX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VITAX trades at $354.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VITAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VGT trades at $691.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VGT's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while FSKAX trades at $174.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check FSKAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTTHX trades at $26.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTTHX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VSCIX trades at $115.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VSCIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while NAESX trades at $115.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check NAESX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VUG trades at $455.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VUG's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VDADX trades at $56.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VDADX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VIG trades at $206.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VIG's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while BN trades at $67.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 146.36. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check BN's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while TBCIX trades at $209.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check TBCIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while TRBCX trades at $207.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check TRBCX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTHRX trades at $41.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTHRX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while PABGX trades at $200.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check PABGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VFORX trades at $47.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VFORX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VTIVX trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VTIVX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while BAM trades at $62.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check BAM's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while IJH trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check IJH's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RRBGX trades at $186.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RRBGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while DODGX trades at $265.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check DODGX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while PRUFX trades at $115.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check PRUFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while PRGFX trades at $114.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check PRGFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while RAFFX trades at $46.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.61. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check RAFFX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VIEIX trades at $149.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VIEIX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while VEMAX trades at $41.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check VEMAX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while AMCPX trades at $45.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check AMCPX's competition here

OFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OFS stands at 111.8M. In comparison, TRSAX has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OFS is priced at $8.35, while TRSAX trades at $109.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OFS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.98, whereas TRSAX's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, OFS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRSAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OFS is more volatile compared to TRSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OFS.Check TRSAX's competition here