PJSC Tatneft

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 462.34B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while XOM trades at $107.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 241.89B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while CVX trades at $138.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 204.54B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RYDAF trades at $34.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 200.84B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SHEL trades at $66.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 198.36B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PCCYF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PCCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 131.04B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TTE trades at $58.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 129.13B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TTFNF trades at $58.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 84.31B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNPMF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and SNPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 77.99B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while BP trades at $29.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -72.61. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 76.98B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while BPAQF trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is -70.14. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 72.25B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PBR-A trades at $10.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 68.63B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OMVKY trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.77B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and RNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 62.96B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while EQNR trades at $23.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 61.99B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while STOHF trades at $22.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and STOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 48.99B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 44.93B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while E trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas E's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 43.25B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SU trades at $34.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 41.98B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while EIPAF trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to EIPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 37.03B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PBR trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 36.28B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while IMO trades at $71.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 29.08B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PUTRY trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PUTRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 28.08B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PETFF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PETFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 26.79B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PUTRF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while CVE trades at $13.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 23.42B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while GLPEY trades at $7.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 18.81B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PSKOF trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OMVJF trades at $51.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and OMVJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 16.80B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while EC trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 14.62B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while REPYY trades at $12.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 14.47B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while REPYF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and REPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while YPF trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 12.08B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OGFGF trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and OGFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 11.51B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while GLPEF trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to GLPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OGFGY trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while NFG trades at $82.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 178.28. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while MGYOY trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TGS trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while HLPMF trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while ISRMF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and ISRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.18M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.35M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and RTEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 255.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while UNTC trades at $25.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 220.00M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while WDGJF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 171.87M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while WDGJY trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to WDGJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98.00M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PXPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 81.08M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SLNG trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 52.40M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while CGBS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.50M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and SEGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SKYQ trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while ECTM trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 5.66M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OKMN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 3.64M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to GRGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while UNTCW trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and UNTCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 813338.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while POGS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to POGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204662.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while AEDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188575.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TRNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and TRNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 26572.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PEMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PEMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20225.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNVP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNVP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19370.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while FRMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FRMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3614.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PGAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PGAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2463.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while BNXR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNXR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and BNXR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2150.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while AMNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1872.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1099.00. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RRRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SNPTY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, POGWY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while POGWY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and POGWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SGTZY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and SGTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, SNP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, RDS-A comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, OJSCY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and OJSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, VCOGF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and VCOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, RDS-B comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, TELZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.58B. In comparison, PTR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.