PJSC Tatneft

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PCCYF has a market cap of 214B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PCCYF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PCCYF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PCCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCCYF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RYDAF has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RYDAF trades at $35.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RYDAF's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYDAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to RYDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check RYDAF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TTFNF has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TTFNF trades at $63.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TTFNF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTFNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to TTFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check TTFNF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BPAQF has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while BPAQF trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas BPAQF's P/E ratio is 142.25. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPAQF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to BPAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check BPAQF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SNPMF has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNPMF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNPMF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SNPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check SNPMF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OMVKY has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OMVKY trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OMVKY's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMVKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OMVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check OMVKY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RNFTF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RNFTF trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RNFTF's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNFTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and RNFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNFTF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, STOHF has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while STOHF trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas STOHF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STOHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and STOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOHF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EIPAF has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while EIPAF trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas EIPAF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EIPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and EIPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIPAF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LUKOY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while LUKOY trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas LUKOY's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to LUKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check LUKOY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PETFF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PETFF trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PETFF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PETFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PETFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PETFF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GLPEY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while GLPEY trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas GLPEY's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLPEY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to GLPEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check GLPEY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PUTRY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PUTRY trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PUTRY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUTRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PUTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check PUTRY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PUTRF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PUTRF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PUTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PUTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check PUTRF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PSKOF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PSKOF trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PSKOF's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to PSKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check PSKOF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, REPYY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while REPYY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas REPYY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REPYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to REPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check REPYY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, REPYF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while REPYF trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas REPYF's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REPYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to REPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check REPYF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OMVJF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OMVJF trades at $54.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OMVJF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMVJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OMVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check OMVJF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OGFGY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OGFGY trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OGFGY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGFGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OGFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check OGFGY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GLPEF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while GLPEF trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas GLPEF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLPEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and GLPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLPEF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OGFGF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OGFGF trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OGFGF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGFGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OGFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check OGFGF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MGYOY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while MGYOY trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas MGYOY's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGYOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to MGYOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check MGYOY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SLTQY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SLTQY trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SLTQY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLTQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SLTQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check SLTQY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HLPMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while HLPMF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas HLPMF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLPMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to HLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check HLPMF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ISRMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while ISRMF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas ISRMF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISRMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to ISRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check ISRMF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RTEXF has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RTEXF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RTEXF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and RTEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTEXF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WDGJY has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while WDGJY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas WDGJY's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDGJY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and WDGJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WDGJY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UNTC has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while UNTC trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas UNTC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to UNTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check UNTC's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WDGJF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while WDGJF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas WDGJF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDGJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to WDGJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check WDGJF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PXPEF has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PXPEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PXPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXPEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PXPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXPEF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SEGYY has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SEGYY trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check SEGYY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UNTCW has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while UNTCW trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas UNTCW's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNTCW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to UNTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check UNTCW's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ECTM has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while ECTM trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas ECTM's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECTM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to ECTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check ECTM's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OKMN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OKMN trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OKMN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKMN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to OKMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check OKMN's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GRGUF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while GRGUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas GRGUF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRGUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and GRGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRGUF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, POGS has a market cap of 639.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while POGS trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas POGS's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POGS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and POGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POGS's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AEDC has a market cap of 204.7K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while AEDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas AEDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEDC's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to AEDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check AEDC's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TRNX has a market cap of 188.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while TRNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas TRNX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRNX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and TRNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRNX's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PEMC has a market cap of 29K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PEMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PEMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PEMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEMC's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SNVP has a market cap of 20.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNVP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNVP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SNVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check SNVP's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FRMC has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while FRMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas FRMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRMC's ROE of +15.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to FRMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check FRMC's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PGAS has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while PGAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas PGAS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and PGAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGAS's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BNXR has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while BNXR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas BNXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNXR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and BNXR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNXR's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMNE has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while AMNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas AMNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to AMNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check AMNE's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NUSPQ has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while NUSPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas NUSPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUSPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to NUSPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check NUSPQ's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RRRI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while RRRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas RRRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRRI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to RRRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check RRRI's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VCOGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while VCOGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas VCOGF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VCOGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and VCOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCOGF's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, OJSCY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while OJSCY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas OJSCY's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OJSCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and OJSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OJSCY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, POGWY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while POGWY trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas POGWY's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POGWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and POGWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POGWY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SGTZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SGTZY trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SGTZY's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGTZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY and SGTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGTZY's competition here

OAOFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OAOFY stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SNPTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OAOFY is priced at $9.55, while SNPTY trades at $46.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OAOFY currently has a P/E ratio of 1.17, whereas SNPTY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, OAOFY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNPTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OAOFY is less volatile compared to SNPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OAOFY.Check SNPTY's competition here