Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha NYUKF Peers
See (NYUKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYUKF | $35.32 | +0.00% | 14.4B | 4.91 | $7.19 | +0.04% |
| CICOY | $9.49 | +1.23% | 34.3B | 4.42 | $2.15 | +11.04% |
| AMKAF | $2,100.00 | +4.90% | 33.3B | 4.67 | $449.96 | +7.79% |
| AMKBY | $10.63 | +4.32% | 32.1B | 4.72 | $2.25 | +7.65% |
| CICOF | $1.77 | +0.00% | 32B | 4.12 | $0.43 | +12.16% |
| AMKBF | $2,070.00 | +2.55% | 31.2B | 4.60 | $449.92 | +7.90% |
| HLAGF | $155.56 | +5.11% | 27.3B | 9.29 | $16.75 | +6.18% |
| HPGLY | $77.00 | +6.46% | 27.1B | 9.19 | $8.38 | +6.03% |
| ICTEF | $8.53 | +5.05% | 17.2B | 20.31 | $0.42 | +2.90% |
| NPNYY | $7.35 | +1.52% | 15.6B | 5.04 | $1.45 | +3.96% |
Stock Comparison
NYUKF vs CICOY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CICOY trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs AMKAF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while AMKAF trades at $2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs AMKBY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while AMKBY trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CICOF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CICOF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs AMKBF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while AMKBF trades at $2,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HLAGF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HLAGF trades at $155.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HPGLY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HPGLY trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs ICTEF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while ICTEF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs NPNYY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while NPNYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs OROVY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while OROVY trades at $91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs MSLOY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while MSLOY trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs OROVF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while OROVF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs MSLOF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while MSLOF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs KAIKY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while KAIKY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs KAKKF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SITIY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SITIY trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SITIF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SITIF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CMHHF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CMHHF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CMHHY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs QNDPF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while QNDPF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs MIHDF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CSDXF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CSDXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HAFNF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CITAF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs DLPTF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs PTAUF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CSPKF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CSPKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HFIAF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs TDGMW Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while TDGMW trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs PTAUY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs BWLLY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HOEGF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HOEGF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CADLF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CADLF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs BWLLF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HCTPF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HCTPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SOIEF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SOIEF trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CKNHF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CKNHF trades at $46.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CITAY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs PCFBY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while PCFBY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HHULF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs PCFBF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while PCFBF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs WTSHF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while WTSHF trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HHULY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HHULY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs IRCUF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while IRCUF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CHDGF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CHDGF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs DPBSF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while DPBSF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs OKENF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs MPZZF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 776.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while MPZZF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs LTKBF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs TJIPF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while TJIPF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SEMUF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs DMCOF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while DMCOF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs AGMJF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while AGMJF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs TSMTF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs PSGFF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs TTBKF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 286.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while TTBKF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs JMSFF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SLOFF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs CSPKY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while CSPKY trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs MKOTF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HSPPF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs VKGLF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs BSEAF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while BSEAF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs HUPHY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while HUPHY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs JNSTF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs WSSTF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while WSSTF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs AWLNF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs GEOUF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs ADCUF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs ASCJF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs GTMAY Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while GTMAY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs ULTRF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SEAOF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs BBLKF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs TEUFF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs WLOLQ Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs PRGNF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs TEUCF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs SEPI Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.
NYUKF vs ITKSF Comparison
NYUKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYUKF stands at 14.4B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYUKF is priced at $35.32, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYUKF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.91, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NYUKF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYUKF is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYUKF.