Nyrstar NV

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, XVALO.MC has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while XVALO.MC trades at €8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas XVALO.MC's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to XVALO.MC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to XVALO.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ERA.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while ERA.PA trades at €50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas ERA.PA's P/E ratio is 100.10. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ERA.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to ERA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AMG.AS has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while AMG.AS trades at €18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas AMG.AS's P/E ratio is -57.27. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AMG.AS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to AMG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, KMR.IR has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while KMR.IR trades at €4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas KMR.IR's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KMR.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to KMR.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RX.PA has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while RX.PA trades at €1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas RX.PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RX.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to RX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MLZAM.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while MLZAM.PA trades at €1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas MLZAM.PA's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MLZAM.PA's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to MLZAM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ORQ1.IR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while ORQ1.IR trades at €0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas ORQ1.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ORQ1.IR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to ORQ1.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MLSUM.PA has a market cap of 102K. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while MLSUM.PA trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas MLSUM.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MLSUM.PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is more volatile compared to MLSUM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.

NYR.BR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NYR.BR stands at 7.1M. In comparison, 8GW.IR has a market cap of 52.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NYR.BR is priced at €0.07, while 8GW.IR trades at €0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NYR.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas 8GW.IR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NYR.BR's ROE is +0.26%, compared to 8GW.IR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYR.BR is less volatile compared to 8GW.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYR.BR.