News Corporation
News Corporation NWS Peers
See (NWS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWS | $32.60 | +0.90% | 16.9B | 39.76 | $0.82 | +0.71% |
| NFLX | $1,231.41 | +0.75% | 524.1B | 58.09 | $21.20 | N/A |
| DIS | $117.63 | -0.20% | 211.5B | 24.06 | $4.89 | +0.81% |
| LYV | $148.89 | +0.42% | 34.5B | 50.30 | $2.96 | N/A |
| FWONA | $93.25 | +1.26% | 32.6B | 1865.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| FWONK | $103.46 | +1.46% | 32.5B | 1724.33 | $0.06 | N/A |
| WBD | $10.52 | -0.47% | 26B | -2.39 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOX | $50.74 | +1.04% | 23.8B | 12.56 | $4.04 | +0.97% |
| FOXA | $55.25 | +0.99% | 23.8B | 13.68 | $4.04 | +0.97% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
NWS vs NFLX Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 524.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while NFLX trades at $1,231.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 58.09. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs DIS Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 211.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while DIS trades at $117.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LYV Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LYV trades at $148.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs FWONA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while FWONA trades at $93.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1865.00. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs FWONK Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while FWONK trades at $103.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 1724.33. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs WBD Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while WBD trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs FOX Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while FOX trades at $50.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs FOXA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while FOXA trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs VIAC Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs NWSA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while NWSA trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs TKO Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while TKO trades at $174.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 88.83. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs WMG Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while WMG trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs ROKU Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while ROKU trades at $80.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -110.95. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs EDR Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs PARA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while PARA trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs PARAA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while PARAA trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs PARAP Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs WWE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs SIRI Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while SIRI trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LLYVK Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LLYVK trades at $79.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 295.63. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LLYVA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LLYVA trades at $78.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 290.52. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs NXST Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while NXST trades at $171.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs MSGS Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while MSGS trades at $203.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 967.90. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CNK Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CNK trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs MANU Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while MANU trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs BATRA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while BATRA trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -148.70. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs BATRK Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while BATRK trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -139.36. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs APE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LGF-B Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LGF-A Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs MSGE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while MSGE trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs BOWL Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LION Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LION trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs IQ Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while IQ trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs IMAX Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while IMAX trades at $28.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 61.80. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs SPHR Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while SPHR trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs AMC Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while AMC trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs PLAY Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while PLAY trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs SBGI Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 940.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while SBGI trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs HUYA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 831.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while HUYA trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -53.14. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs MCS Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 526.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while MCS trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -41.97. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs RSVR Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while RSVR trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 62.08. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs AMCX Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 269.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while AMCX trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LIVX Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs AENT Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while AENT trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs GAIA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while GAIA trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs AGAE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while AGAE trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs GNUS Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LVO Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LVO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CNVS Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CNVS trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CIDM Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs RSVRW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while RSVRW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs RDIB Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while RDIB trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs RDI Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while RDI trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs NIPG Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while NIPG trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs TOON Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while TOON trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs ANGH Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while ANGH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs ANGHW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs ADD Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while ADD trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs MMV Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs BREA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while BREA trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs DLPN Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while DLPN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CSCW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CPOP Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CPOP trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs KUKE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while KUKE trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs AENTW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while AENTW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is more volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs HOFV Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while HOFV trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CSSEP Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs BZFDW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while BZFDW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CSSEN Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CSSE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs BLMZ Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while BLMZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs CSSEL Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs HOFVW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs RDBXW Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs LVOPP Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NWS has daily volatility of 1.96 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
NWS vs MSGN Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs ESGC Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs HMTV Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs DISCK Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs DISCB Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs RDBX Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs EMWP Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs AESE Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs VIACP Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.
NWS vs VIACA Comparison
NWS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWS stands at 16.9B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWS is priced at $32.60, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.76, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, NWS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NWS is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWS.