NatWest Group plc

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, 0Q1F.L has a market cap of 813.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while 0Q1F.L trades at £290.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas 0Q1F.L's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0Q1F.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is less volatile compared to 0Q1F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check 0Q1F.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, 0QKU.L has a market cap of 182.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while 0QKU.L trades at £130.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas 0QKU.L's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QKU.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QKU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check 0QKU.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, HSBA.L has a market cap of 161B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while HSBA.L trades at £925.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas HSBA.L's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSBA.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is more volatile compared to HSBA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check HSBA.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, 0R01.L has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while 0R01.L trades at £52.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas 0R01.L's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R01.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is less volatile compared to 0R01.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check 0R01.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BNC.L has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while BNC.L trades at £649.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas BNC.L's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is less volatile compared to BNC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check BNC.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BVA.L has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while BVA.L trades at £14.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas BVA.L's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BVA.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is less volatile compared to BVA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check BVA.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, 0R3T.L has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while 0R3T.L trades at £16.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas 0R3T.L's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R3T.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R3T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check 0R3T.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, BARC.L has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while BARC.L trades at £360.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas BARC.L's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BARC.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is less volatile compared to BARC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check BARC.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, STAN.L has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while STAN.L trades at £1,378.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas STAN.L's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STAN.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is more volatile compared to STAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check STAN.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, AEMU.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while AEMU.L trades at £44.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas AEMU.L's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEMU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is more volatile compared to AEMU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check AEMU.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, 0RL9.L has a market cap of 535.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while 0RL9.L trades at £9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas 0RL9.L's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0RL9.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is more volatile compared to 0RL9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check 0RL9.L's competition here

NWG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NWG.L stands at 42.7B. In comparison, CABP.L has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWG.L is priced at £522.80, while CABP.L trades at £46.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CABP.L's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, NWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CABP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWG.L is less volatile compared to CABP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWG.L.Check CABP.L's competition here