NuLegacy Gold Corporation

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 63.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMF trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 18.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while GFIOF trades at $21.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while NESRF trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while CAHPF trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and CAHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while LUGDF trades at $41.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while HGMCF trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while AULGF trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while EDVMF trades at $27.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -66.19. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ARGTF trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -207.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMY trades at $44.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while PMNXF trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while OCANF trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while TORXF trades at $29.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while DPMLF trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while GSISF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ELKMF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while KNTNF trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while CELTF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RMLRF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while REDLF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while WDOFF trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while CXBMF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while HCHDF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ORAAF trades at $18.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while DRDGF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while AURQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MAUTF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 901.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MWSNF trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -73.98. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 899.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while BELGF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and BELGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 843.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while SNWGF trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 799.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RUPRF trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -170.75. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 745.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RMGGF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 568.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while GUYGF trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -78.80. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 556.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while PDIYF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 479.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MNSAF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and MNSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 401.07M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and ECRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 395.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ORZCF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 378.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ASGOF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 354.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while LMGDF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 326.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while THXPF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 321.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RSRBF trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and RSRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 315.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MNDJF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 313.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RIOFF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -14.73. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 309.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while PROBF trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 292.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while RMLFF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 282.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ALKEF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and ALKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 274.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while FDMIF trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -32.03. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 262.14M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while OGNRF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 260.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MAKOF trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 248.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while ELEMF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 201.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while WRLGF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 199.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while STBMF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 192.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while HSTXF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 188.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while OMGGF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 176.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while JAGGF trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -27.81. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 176.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 174.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while SRBIF trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 170.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while GDRZF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 170.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while THSGF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 164.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while STPGF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 157.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while GGAZF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.52. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF and NVOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 140.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while DNGDF trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.

NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 2.43M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 137.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.00, while MAIFF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.