NuLegacy Gold Corporation
NuLegacy Gold Corporation NULGF Peers
See (NULGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NULGF | $0.05 | N/A | 42.3M | -0.04 | -$1.32 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.45 | -2.00% | 67.6B | 12.89 | $0.19 | +2.16% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +340.36% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | N/A | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $13.74 | -0.87% | 19.6B | 25.92 | $0.53 | +1.52% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.42% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $52.95 | -1.48% | 12.8B | 23.85 | $2.22 | +2.95% |
| CAHPF | $5.26 | -4.28% | 10.5B | 22.85 | $0.23 | +1.13% |
Stock Comparison
NULGF vs ZIJMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ZIJMF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OPYGY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs GFIOF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs NESRF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while NESRF trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs NSTYY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs NCMGY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs NCMGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs LUGDF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while LUGDF trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs CAHPF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while CAHPF trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs HGMCF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ZHAOF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs AULGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs EDVMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while EDVMF trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -72.71. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs SBYSF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while SBYSF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ARGTF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ARGTF trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -266.75. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs DGMLF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OCANF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OCANF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs GSISF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while GSISF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ZIJMY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ZIJMY trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs PMNXF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while PMNXF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs GRLGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs KNTNF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while KNTNF trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs TORXF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while TORXF trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ELKMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ELKMF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RGRNF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RGRNF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -347.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs CRNLF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while CRNLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.15. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs DPMLF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while DPMLF trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs CELTF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs WDOFF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while WDOFF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RMLRF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RMLRF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs KOZAY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs REDLF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while REDLF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ORAAF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ORAAF trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -20.27. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs WFRSF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while WFRSF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs CXBMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs HCHDF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while HCHDF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs EOGSF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while EOGSF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs DRDGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OBNNF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MWSNF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MWSNF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -83.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs PAFRF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MAUTF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MAUTF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs AURQF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs HCHDY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs BELGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while BELGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs SVLKF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs SNWGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 915.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while SNWGF trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -40.64. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs SGSVF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RUPRF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 866M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RUPRF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs KRRGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RMGGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 787.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RMGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs PDIYF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 714.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while PDIYF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -27.28. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs WTGRF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RGDFF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RMGGY Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ASGOF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 576.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ASGOF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MNSAF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 545.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MNSAF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ECRTF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 531.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ECRTF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs GUYGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 515.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while GUYGF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -71.22. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs NVMLF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OSKA Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ORZCF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 478.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ORZCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RSRBF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 472.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RSRBF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 81.67. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ARNGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RMLFF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 429.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RMLFF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs RIOFF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while RIOFF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 92.01. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs LMGDF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs THXPF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 373.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while THXPF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs KSKGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs PROBF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 345.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while PROBF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs TPRXF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MNDJF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 342.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MNDJF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ELEMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ELEMF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ALKEF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ALKEF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MAKOF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 300.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MAKOF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs URGYF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, URGYF has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while URGYF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas URGYF's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to URGYF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to URGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs FDMIF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 288.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while FDMIF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -30.30. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OGNRF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OGNRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 140.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MGDPF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OSIIF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs ERRSF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs STPGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while STPGF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs OMGGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while OMGGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -19.97. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs GDRZF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while GDRZF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs STBMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs SRBIF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while SRBIF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs HSTXF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while HSTXF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs JAGGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while JAGGF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -32.32. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs WRLGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 201.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while WRLGF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs AGXKF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs SAAGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs CNLMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs DCCNF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs CNMXF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs THSGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while THSGF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs MAIFF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while MAIFF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs FFMGF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while FFMGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs EEYMF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.
NULGF vs GGAZF Comparison
NULGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NULGF stands at 42.3M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NULGF is priced at $0.05, while GGAZF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NULGF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NULGF's ROE is -2.04%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NULGF is more volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NULGF.