NTT DATA Corporation

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 231.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while IBM trades at $249.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 192.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ACN trades at $307.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FISV trades at $114.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 102.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FI trades at $184.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 72.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while INFY trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 41.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FJTSY trades at $23.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 39.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTSH trades at $79.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 38.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NTDTY trades at $27.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 37.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FJTSF trades at $20.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 33.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while IT trades at $432.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 32.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NIPNF trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NIPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 29.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WIT trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 28.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CGEMY trades at $33.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 28.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CAPMF trades at $167.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 27.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BR trades at $237.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CDW trades at $178.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GIB trades at $105.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NRILY trades at $39.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 21.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NURAF trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while LDOS trades at $155.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WIZEY trades at $14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WPLCF trades at $13.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 13.69B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AUROW trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while JKHY trades at $180.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 12.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AUR trades at $7.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CACI trades at $478.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while EPAM trades at $177.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 8.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while KD trades at $37.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while G trades at $42.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while EXLS trades at $45.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DLB trades at $75.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WAY trades at $40.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 307.77. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TISNF trades at $29.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DTATF trades at $43.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ISMAF trades at $33.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SAIC trades at $121.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GLOB trades at $128.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BECTY trades at $8.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and BECTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GDS trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is -44.65. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PAY trades at $36.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while INGM trades at $19.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TSYHY trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and TSYHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TSYHF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SPSAF trades at $199.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CNXC trades at $53.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CD trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ISMAY trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AI trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DXC trades at $16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is -54.20. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DXC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CLVT trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NWITY trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NWKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AEXAY trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ASGN trades at $55.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WNS trades at $54.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SLNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NTCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BULLZ trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while LZMH trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -1110.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LZMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ATEAY trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NYAX trades at $42.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is -263.50. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYAX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TASK trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FORTY trades at $97.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and HLTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VYX trades at $10.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and TWKS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NABL trades at $7.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ATAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FLYW trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 272.25. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while APLD trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GDYN trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 107.31. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while INOD trades at $34.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CRAYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NGRRF trades at $75.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 963.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SESPF trades at $61.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and KSUEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and KAHTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 917.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BBAI trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 914.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PSFE trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 907.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 875.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ADSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and TRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 762.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AEXAF trades at $40.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 732.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 702.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while MGIC trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 694.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while XRX trades at $5.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 684.82M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HCKT trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 604.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CTLPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 562.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTLP trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 467.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and GBDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 403.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while IBEX trades at $30.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 369.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 364.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CNDT trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and DTTLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 344.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while UIS trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SVPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 271.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DMRC trades at $12.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 266.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VNET trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is 298.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 261.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 253.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TTEC trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SSCC trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 229.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ITFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while APMRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 223.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while III trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas III's P/E ratio is 77.33. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to III's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 204.45M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FCCN trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -60.40. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 194.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PHLT trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 183.40M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TSSI trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 168.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ALVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 162.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CSPI trades at $16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is 821.50. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 156.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while LHSW trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LHSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 146.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TLS trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 138.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while APXYY trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 130.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ALYAF trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 127.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GSDT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and GSDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 114.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while APPEF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and APPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while QUISF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and QUISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CNGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 102.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NOTE trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 89.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NOTE-WT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 83.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTM trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 77.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SAIH trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and KDCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 58.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VEEA trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while EAXR trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and EAXR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HLEO trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 54.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SDHIU trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 52.83M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WYY trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 44.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DVLT trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 43.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GMM trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 41.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while USIO trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 38.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while MASK trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MASK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SEBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 34.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GLE trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 29.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BTCM trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SNELF trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SNELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 27.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CLPS trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.88. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 26.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DTST trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 52.57. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 24.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BNXAF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and BNXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 22.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 18.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SPOFF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SPOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 18.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ARBB trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 14.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CYCU trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 13.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while JDZG trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 7.25M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while POSAF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and KNRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FUUN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BRQSF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DCSX trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and DCSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CPIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DRGV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and DRGV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SEAV trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SKTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NOSUF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SNOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WAVD trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DTSTW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.02M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CRCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TDTH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SFWJ has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SFWJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SFWJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFWJ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SFWJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GTCH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and GTCH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, MOOIF has a market cap of 1.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while MOOIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas MOOIF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOOIF's ROE of +18.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to MOOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DTMXF has a market cap of 1.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DTMXF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DTMXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTMXF's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and DTMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SUIC has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SUIC trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SUIC's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SUIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CYCUW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SSFT has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SSFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SSFT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SSFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CATG has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CATG trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CATG's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CATG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CATG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 871224.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while JFU trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VEII has a market cap of 783014.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VEII trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VEII's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEII's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VEII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ESYL has a market cap of 697406.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ESYL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ESYL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESYL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ESYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NFTFF has a market cap of 685285.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NFTFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NFTFF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFTFF's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NFTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SDVI has a market cap of 674664.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SDVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SDVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SDVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AGILQ has a market cap of 581689.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AGILQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AGILQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGILQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AGILQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, UTRX has a market cap of 504772.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while UTRX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas UTRX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UTRX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and UTRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TRIRW has a market cap of 397925.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TRIRW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TRIRW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRIRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TRIRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 313079.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HMNY has a market cap of 300139.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HMNY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HMNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMNY's ROE of +11.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and HMNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SLLN has a market cap of 272904.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SLLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SLLN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SLLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ROKK has a market cap of 272428.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ROKK trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ROKK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ROKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DYNE has a market cap of 232936.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DYNE trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DYNE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DYNE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and DYNE have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 171018.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SAIHW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DIGAF has a market cap of 168217.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DIGAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DIGAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIGAF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DIGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CBRI has a market cap of 163292.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CBRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBRI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ZWBC has a market cap of 134886.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ZWBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ZWBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZWBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ZWBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, APQT has a market cap of 108108.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while APQT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas APQT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APQT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and APQT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, IPSI has a market cap of 105567.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while IPSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas IPSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPSI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to IPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HUBV has a market cap of 101820.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HUBV trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HUBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUBV's ROE of -4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and HUBV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CLTS has a market cap of 99989.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CLTS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CLTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CLTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ICLD has a market cap of 95702.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ICLD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ICLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ICLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ADGL has a market cap of 95638.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ADGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ADGL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADGL's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ADGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ALYI has a market cap of 93379.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ALYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ALYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALYI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ALYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, RCMH has a market cap of 84453.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while RCMH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas RCMH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to RCMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, WCIG has a market cap of 53613.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while WCIG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas WCIG's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WCIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to WCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, XALL has a market cap of 48973.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while XALL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas XALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XALL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to XALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, RGGI has a market cap of 45979.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while RGGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas RGGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGGI's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and RGGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, INIX has a market cap of 40485.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while INIX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas INIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to INIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GSPH has a market cap of 37091.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GSPH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GSPH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GSPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, YIPI has a market cap of 29790.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while YIPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas YIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YIPI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and YIPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HWNI has a market cap of 21097.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HWNI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HWNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWNI's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to HWNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, EXCC has a market cap of 10246.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while EXCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas EXCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXCC's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to EXCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, EMRH has a market cap of 10100.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while EMRH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas EMRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMRH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and EMRH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CMPY has a market cap of 6671.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CMPY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CMPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TPPPF has a market cap of 6094.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TPPPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TPPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPPPF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TPPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FCTI has a market cap of 5522.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FCTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FCTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and FCTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ENHT has a market cap of 5238.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ENHT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ENHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENHT's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to ENHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PGFY has a market cap of 5010.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PGFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PGFY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HZHI has a market cap of 4973.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HZHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HZHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HZHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and HZHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NDVNQ has a market cap of 4759.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NDVNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NDVNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDVNQ's ROE of +5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to NDVNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DGIF has a market cap of 4340.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DGIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DGIF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to DGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, THDS has a market cap of 3713.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while THDS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas THDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THDS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to THDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CCTR has a market cap of 2977.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CCTR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CCTR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CCTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CKYS has a market cap of 2000.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CKYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CKYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKYS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, OTFT has a market cap of 1737.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while OTFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas OTFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to OTFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PRZM has a market cap of 1007.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PRZM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PRZM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRZM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and PRZM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PRLO has a market cap of 730.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PRLO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PRLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and PRLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SCNTQ has a market cap of 661.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SCNTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SCNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCNTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SCNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, RTNB has a market cap of 610.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while RTNB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas RTNB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTNB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and RTNB have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, VBTC has a market cap of 528.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while VBTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas VBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VBTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to VBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, USDC has a market cap of 371.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while USDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas USDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to USDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BETSF has a market cap of 312.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BETSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BETSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BETSF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and BETSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TSCC has a market cap of 257.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TSCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TSCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and TSCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BTSR has a market cap of 210.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BTSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BTSR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTSR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and BTSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ITTOF has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ITTOF trades at $28.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ITTOF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITTOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ITTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ITTOY has a market cap of 150.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ITTOY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ITTOY's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ITTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, DPFD has a market cap of 114.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while DPFD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas DPFD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and DPFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, IMCI has a market cap of 104.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while IMCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas IMCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMCI's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to IMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NONEY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NONEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SEVM has a market cap of 90.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SEVM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SEVM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and SEVM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NONEF has a market cap of 84.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NONEF trades at $27.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NONEF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NONEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NONEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ATHC has a market cap of 75.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ATHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ATHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATHC's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ATHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, NNSCF has a market cap of 46.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while NNSCF trades at $15.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas NNSCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNSCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and NNSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, HYDN has a market cap of 39.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while HYDN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas HYDN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYDN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and HYDN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SFBTF has a market cap of 35.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SFBTF trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SFBTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFBTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SFBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CCRC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CCRC trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CCRC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCRC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CCRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, ACZT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while ACZT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas ACZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACZT's ROE of -70.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and ACZT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, AVCT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while AVCT trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas AVCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVCT's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to AVCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SYKE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SYKE trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SYKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SYKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CNLK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CNLK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CNLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CNLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CSVI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CSVI trades at $57.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CSVI's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSVI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CSVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, BLFDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while BLFDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas BLFDF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLFDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to BLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CTEK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CTEK trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CTEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SWCH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SWCH trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, SREV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while SREV trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas SREV's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SREV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to SREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CRGE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CRGE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CRGE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRGE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to CRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, REKRW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while REKRW trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas REKRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REKRW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and REKRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, PCPJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while PCPJ trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas PCPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to PCPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, GDYNW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while GDYNW trades at $14.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas GDYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDYNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to GDYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, FCCND comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while FCCND trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas FCCND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCCND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and FCCND have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, TRIT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while TRIT trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas TRIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF is less volatile compared to TRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTTDF.

NTTDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTTDF stands at 38.42B. In comparison, CYXT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTTDF is priced at $27.40, while CYXT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTTDF currently has a P/E ratio of 37.53, whereas CYXT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTTDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYXT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTTDF and CYXT have similar daily volatility (0.00).