NTT DATA Corporation
NTT DATA Corporation NTDTY Peers
See (NTDTY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTDTY | $26.95 | -6.39% | 37.8B | 37.96 | $0.71 | N/A |
| DUSXF | $505.67 | +12026.38% | 686.4B | 3371.13 | $0.15 | N/A |
| FJTSY | $22.84 | -0.20% | 41.6B | 28.54 | $0.80 | N/A |
| FJTSF | $23.10 | +10.26% | 41.1B | 28.88 | $0.80 | +0.90% |
| NTTDF | $24.82 | -9.42% | 34.8B | 34.96 | $0.71 | +0.36% |
| NIPNF | $22.90 | N/A | 30.5B | 24.89 | $0.92 | +0.81% |
| CAPMF | $170.77 | +1.88% | 29B | 15.84 | $10.78 | +2.29% |
| CGEMY | $33.56 | +0.00% | 28.6B | 15.61 | $2.15 | +2.23% |
| NRILY | $39.95 | +0.53% | 23B | 35.04 | $1.14 | N/A |
| NURAF | $39.20 | -3.21% | 22.4B | 34.39 | $1.14 | +1.13% |
Stock Comparison
NTDTY vs DUSXF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 686.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DUSXF trades at $505.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 3371.13. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs FJTSY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while FJTSY trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs FJTSF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while FJTSF trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NTTDF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NTTDF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NIPNF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NIPNF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CAPMF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CAPMF trades at $170.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CGEMY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CGEMY trades at $33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NRILY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NRILY trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NURAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NURAF trades at $39.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs WIZEY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while WIZEY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs WPLCF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while WPLCF trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ISMAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ISMAF trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DTATF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs BHTLF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while BHTLF trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs BECTY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while BECTY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs TISNF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while TISNF trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs AEXAY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while AEXAY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 1000.00. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs RPYTF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while RPYTF trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs TSYHY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while TSYHY trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs TSYHF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while TSYHF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ISMAY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ISMAY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SPSAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SPSAF trades at $172.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CTLPP Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CTLPP trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1341.67. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NWITY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NWKLF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NSSXF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SLNTY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NDTAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NDTAF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NTCYF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CFTLF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CFTLF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ATEAY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ATEAY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs HLTEF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ATAZF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NCRRP Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NCRRP trades at $842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 720.27. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DLGEF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DLGEF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs NGRRF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while NGRRF trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CRAYF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SLUNF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 983.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SLUNF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -39.96. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DTSOF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SESPF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs KSUEF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs KAHTY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ADSGF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CCCMF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 822.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CCCMF trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CTSDF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs AEXAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while AEXAF trades at $40.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs TRCLF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs FDRVF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -30.69. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DVRNF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 733.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DVRNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs FDDMF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs GBDMF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CMTUF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DCHIF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DCHIF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CEJOF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DTTLY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 343.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SVPLF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ITFRF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ITFRF trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CSYJY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CSYJY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs EMCHF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while EMCHF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SSCC Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs APMRF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs FCCN Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 206.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while FCCN trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CSYJF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 203.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CSYJF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs APXYY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 190M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while APXYY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ULPRF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ULPRF trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ALVNF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs WYLDF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while WYLDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs KDCXF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs ALYAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while ALYAF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs APPEF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while APPEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs QUISF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CNGFF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DCHIY Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DCHIY trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs QSCGF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while QSCGF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs HLEO Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while HLEO trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs GSDT Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while GSDT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs EAXR Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CXGEF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SEBFF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SNELF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs BNXAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while BNXAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SPOFF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SPOFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs KTHGF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while KTHGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs MLBEF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while MLBEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs POSAF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while POSAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs XTMIF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CBRI Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CBRI has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CBRI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CBRI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBRI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is less volatile compared to CBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs MOBIF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SUIC Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SUIC has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SUIC trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SUIC's P/E ratio is -59.94. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SUIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs KNRLF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while KNRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs BRQSF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while BRQSF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs FUUN Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DCSX Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs MOOIF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, MOOIF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while MOOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas MOOIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOOIF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to MOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CPIHF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs DRGV Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs SKTCF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs VSSSF Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.
NTDTY vs CRCW Comparison
NTDTY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDTY stands at 37.8B. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDTY is priced at $26.95, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDTY currently has a P/E ratio of 37.96, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NTDTY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDTY is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDTY.