Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Nintendo Co., Ltd. NTDOF Peers
See (NTDOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTDOF | $84.20 | +0.57% | 98B | 50.42 | $1.67 | +1.20% |
| NTDOY | $21.03 | +0.67% | 97.9B | 50.07 | $0.42 | +0.28% |
| NETTF | $24.64 | +0.57% | 78.3B | 17.73 | $1.39 | +2.65% |
| KONMY | $66.96 | N/A | 18.2B | 34.69 | $1.93 | +0.19% |
| NEXOY | $17.87 | -2.50% | 14.5B | 17.02 | $1.05 | +0.00% |
| NEXOF | $15.70 | N/A | 12.7B | 14.95 | $1.05 | +0.01% |
| CCOEY | $15.02 | +0.17% | 12.6B | 36.62 | $0.41 | +0.39% |
| CCOEF | $25.35 | N/A | 10.6B | 31.30 | $0.81 | +1.07% |
| SQNNY | $32.41 | +7.23% | 7.8B | 45.65 | $0.71 | +0.32% |
| SQNXF | $63.62 | +5.33% | 7.6B | 44.49 | $1.43 | +1.06% |
Stock Comparison
NTDOF vs NTDOY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while NTDOY trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NETTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while NETTF trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KONMY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while KONMY trades at $66.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NEXOY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while NEXOY trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NEXOF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while NEXOF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCOEY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while CCOEY trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCOEF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while CCOEF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SQNNY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SQNNY trades at $32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SQNXF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SQNXF trades at $63.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 44.49. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLBLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while BLBLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -90.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KSFTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs OTGLY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while OTGLY trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 50.93. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs OTGLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while OTGLF trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 44.58. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BCDMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SGAMY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SGAMY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SGAMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SGAMF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KYYWF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs THQQF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while THQQF trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs DNACF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while DNACF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PRXXF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while PRXXF trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MIXIF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while MIXIF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs UBSFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while UBSFF trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs UBSFY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while UBSFY trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KYYWY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs XDNCF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while XDNCF trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 299.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BOYAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while BOYAF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GUNGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 917.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GUNGF trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GREZF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 860.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GREZF trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RVTTY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IGGGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 554.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TSVNF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCFR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SCFR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLITF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while BLITF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RMDEF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while RMDEF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -222.22. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AKAFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while AKAFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AXNVF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 255.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while AXNVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs STLFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 212.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while STLFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GENTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GENTF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FRRDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ENADF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while ENADF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FGRTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PONGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while PONGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IDGAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs POPRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EAGRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while EAGRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GAMGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of +15.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs VSQTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while VSQTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SMPBF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SRVTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ZUKI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while ZUKI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCTGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WIGAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ENDRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NVNT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YDRMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMETF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GGAMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PRYNF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TAPM Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 955.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while TAPM trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EPYFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 940.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SWMIF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KSMRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 679.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IMGX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ATIG Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 593K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs APETF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 509.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while APETF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FRZT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 495.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WGRFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 447.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FASDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 210K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IENT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 150.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while IENT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TIIDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs COUV Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMGT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 45.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SPYR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 35.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CLIS Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PLGC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NTEK Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs STIE Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs LIVC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLKCF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 12.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WINRW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ADTR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs VRVR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YVRLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WINR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs HTSF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TERA Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SPLY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IPUB Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RIVX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GBNW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 98B. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $84.20, while GBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 50.42, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.