Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Nintendo Co., Ltd. NTDOF Peers
See (NTDOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
NTDOF vs NTDOY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 101.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NTDOY trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ATVI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NETTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 70.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NETTF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NTES Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 69.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NTES trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RBLX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 48.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while RBLX trades at $71.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -53.99. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EA Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 40.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while EA trades at $154.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TTWO Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TTWO has a market cap of 39.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TTWO trades at $225.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TTWO's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTWO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KONMY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 17.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while KONMY trades at $65.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NEXOY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 13.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NEXOY trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NEXOF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 12.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NEXOF trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCOEY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while CCOEY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 54.07. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCOEF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while CCOEF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs DDI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 9.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while DDI trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BILI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 7.53B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BILI trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is -41.52. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BILI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLBLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BLBLF trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -49.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SQNXF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SQNXF trades at $58.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 77.64. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SQNNY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SQNNY trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 76.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs OTGLY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while OTGLY trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KSFTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs OTGLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while OTGLF trades at $57.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 49.80. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SGAMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SGAMF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BCDMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SGAMY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SGAMY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs DNACF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while DNACF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KYYWF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs THQQF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while THQQF trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PLTK Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while PLTK trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PRXXF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while PRXXF trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs UBSFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while UBSFF trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -26.42. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MIXIF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while MIXIF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs UBSFY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while UBSFY trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KYYWY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs XDNCF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AVID Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVID's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GREZF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GUNGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 939.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GUNGF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RVTTY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IGGGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 554.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while IGGGF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCPL Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TSVNF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GRVY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 421.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GRVY trades at $60.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BOYAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 401.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BOYAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SOHU Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 360.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SOHU trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLITF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 333.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BLITF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GCL Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 305.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GCL trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is -242.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GDEV Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 301.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GDEV trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCFR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 299.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SCFR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMGI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 247.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GMGI trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -187.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs STLFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 210.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while STLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RMDEF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 207.05M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while RMDEF trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -169.32. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AKAFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MYPS Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 175.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while MYPS trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MYPSW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 168.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FRRDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 135.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while FRRDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BRAG Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 106.54M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BRAG trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ENADF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 106.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ENADF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FGRTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 99.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while FGRTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GENTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 80.95M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GENTF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SKLZ Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 76.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SKLZ trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMHS Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 69.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GMHS trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PONGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 61.79M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while PONGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IDGAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 55.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while IDGAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SNAL Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 39.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SNAL trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs POPRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.65M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GDC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 31.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GDC trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDC's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GAME Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 26.61M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GAME trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAME's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EAGRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 23.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while EAGRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -28.61. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GAMGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22.03M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GIGM Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 17.08M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GIGM trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs VSQTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 14.65M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while VSQTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ZUKI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 13.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ZUKI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MSGM Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 13.05M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while MSGM trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSGM's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SMPBF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BHAT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 10.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BHAT trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SRVTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TRUG Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 8.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TRUG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRUG's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCTGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GXAI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GXAI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TBH Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 6.62M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TBH trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WIGAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ENDRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NVNT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4.05M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVNT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YDRMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MGAM Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 3.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while MGAM trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NFTG Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFTG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GGAMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GGAMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GCLWW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GCLWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PRYNF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TAPM Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TAPM trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SWMIF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742244.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs APETF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 729894.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while APETF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EPYFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 715820.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KSMRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 680168.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IMGX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642041.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FRZT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 615459.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ATIG Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 592953.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NCTY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 454935.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NCTY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WGRFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 443540.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMETF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 427616.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IENT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 405670.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while IENT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GDEVW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 299147.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GDEVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TIIDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131075.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs COUV Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62507.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CLIS Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34329.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NTEK Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 17865.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs STIE Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 16988.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs LIVC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16291.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PLGC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 13944.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WINRW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9484.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMGT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9140.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ADTR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4416.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FASDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4200.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs VRVR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4126.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SPYR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AXNVF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2559.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WINR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2371.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs HTSF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1800.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TERA Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1348.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TERA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLKCF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1224.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SPLY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1187.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GGL Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1058.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTDOF has daily volatility of 5.18 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.
NTDOF vs IPUB Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1040.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RIVX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YVRLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCNC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, CCNC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ZNGA Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, ZNGA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, SCR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GBNW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, GBNW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while GBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YVR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 100.59B. In comparison, YVR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $86.40, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 45.00, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTDOY | $21.83 | +0.63% | 101.64B | 45.47 | $0.48 | +0.27% |
| NTDOF | $86.40 | -0.98% | 100.59B | 45.00 | $1.92 | +1.13% |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.29B | 34.59 | $2.73 | N/A |
| NETTF | $22.05 | +0.75% | 70.09B | 17.50 | $1.26 | +2.34% |
| NTES | $109.80 | +0.68% | 69.81B | 17.40 | $6.31 | +2.34% |
| RBLX | $71.81 | -3.08% | 48.71B | -53.99 | -$1.33 | N/A |
| EA | $154.74 | +2.41% | 40.33B | 39.37 | $3.93 | +0.49% |
| TTWO | $225.26 | +2.62% | 39.76B | -10.54 | -$21.38 | N/A |
| KONMY | $65.65 | +9.25% | 17.80B | 32.66 | $2.01 | +0.32% |
| NEXOY | $16.03 | +1.33% | 13.00B | 14.18 | $1.13 | +0.32% |