Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Nintendo Co., Ltd. NTDOF Peers
See (NTDOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTDOF | $87.09 | -4.41% | 101.4B | 51.53 | $1.69 | +1.16% |
| NTDOY | $21.96 | -4.02% | 102.3B | 53.56 | $0.41 | +0.26% |
| NETTF | $24.65 | -9.68% | 78.4B | 15.80 | $1.56 | +2.24% |
| KONMY | $76.50 | -0.13% | 20.7B | 40.05 | $1.91 | +0.17% |
| NEXOY | $19.53 | +1.82% | 15.8B | 18.78 | $1.04 | +0.00% |
| NEXOF | $19.10 | N/A | 15.5B | 18.37 | $1.04 | +0.01% |
| CCOEY | $16.06 | -0.32% | 13.4B | 40.15 | $0.40 | +0.36% |
| CCOEF | $27.18 | N/A | 11.4B | 33.97 | $0.80 | +1.00% |
| SQNXF | $68.20 | +2.17% | 8.2B | 48.37 | $1.41 | +0.99% |
| BLBLF | $19.00 | N/A | 7.9B | -95.00 | -$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTDOF vs NTDOY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, NTDOY has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while NTDOY trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas NTDOY's P/E ratio is 53.56. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTDOY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NTDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NETTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, NETTF has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while NETTF trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas NETTF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NETTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KONMY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, KONMY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while KONMY trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas KONMY's P/E ratio is 40.05. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KONMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KONMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NEXOY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, NEXOY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while NEXOY trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas NEXOY's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEXOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to NEXOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NEXOF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, NEXOF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while NEXOF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas NEXOF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NEXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCOEY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, CCOEY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while CCOEY trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas CCOEY's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCOEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to CCOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CCOEF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, CCOEF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while CCOEF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas CCOEF's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCOEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to CCOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SQNXF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SQNXF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SQNXF trades at $68.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SQNXF's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQNXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SQNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLBLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, BLBLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while BLBLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas BLBLF's P/E ratio is -95.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLBLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BLBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SQNNY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SQNNY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SQNNY trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SQNNY's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQNNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SQNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs OTGLY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, OTGLY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while OTGLY trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas OTGLY's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTGLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to OTGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs OTGLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, OTGLF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while OTGLF trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas OTGLF's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTGLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to OTGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KSFTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, KSFTF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while KSFTF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas KSFTF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSFTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KSFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SGAMY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SGAMY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SGAMY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SGAMY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGAMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SGAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BCDMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, BCDMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while BCDMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas BCDMF's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to BCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SGAMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SGAMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SGAMF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SGAMF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGAMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SGAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KYYWF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, KYYWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while KYYWF trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas KYYWF's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KYYWF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KYYWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs THQQF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, THQQF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while THQQF trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas THQQF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THQQF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to THQQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PRXXF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, PRXXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while PRXXF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas PRXXF's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRXXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to PRXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs DNACF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, DNACF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while DNACF trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas DNACF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNACF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to DNACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs MIXIF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, MIXIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while MIXIF trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas MIXIF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIXIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to MIXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KYYWY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, KYYWY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while KYYWY trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas KYYWY's P/E ratio is -53.74. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KYYWY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to KYYWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs UBSFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, UBSFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while UBSFF trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas UBSFF's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to UBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs UBSFY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, UBSFY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while UBSFY trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas UBSFY's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to UBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs XDNCF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, XDNCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while XDNCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas XDNCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XDNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to XDNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GREZF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GREZF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GREZF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GREZF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GREZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GREZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GUNGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GUNGF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GUNGF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GUNGF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUNGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RVTTY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, RVTTY has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while RVTTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas RVTTY's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVTTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to RVTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IGGGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, IGGGF has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while IGGGF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas IGGGF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IGGGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to IGGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TSVNF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BOYAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, BOYAF has a market cap of 444.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while BOYAF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas BOYAF's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOYAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BOYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs STLFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, STLFF has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while STLFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas STLFF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to STLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCFR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SCFR has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SCFR trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SCFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCFR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SCFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RMDEF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, RMDEF has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while RMDEF trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas RMDEF's P/E ratio is -225.22. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMDEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to RMDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AKAFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, AKAFF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while AKAFF trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas AKAFF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKAFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to AKAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FRRDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, FRRDF has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while FRRDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas FRRDF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRRDF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to FRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ENADF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, ENADF has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while ENADF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas ENADF's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENADF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to ENADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PONGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, PONGF has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while PONGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas PONGF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PONGF's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PONGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GENTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GENTF has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GENTF trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GENTF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GENTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to GENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EAGRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, EAGRF has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while EAGRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas EAGRF's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAGRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to EAGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs POPRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, POPRF has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while POPRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas POPRF's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to POPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IDGAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, IDGAF has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while IDGAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas IDGAF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDGAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to IDGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FGRTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, FGRTF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while FGRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas FGRTF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGRTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to FGRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GAMGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GAMGF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GAMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GAMGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAMGF's ROE of +15.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs VSQTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, VSQTF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while VSQTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas VSQTF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VSQTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to VSQTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ZUKI Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, ZUKI has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while ZUKI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas ZUKI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZUKI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to ZUKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SMPBF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SMPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SMPBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SMPBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMPBF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SMPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SRVTF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SRVTF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SRVTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SRVTF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SCTGF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SCTGF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SCTGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SCTGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCTGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SCTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WIGAF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, WIGAF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while WIGAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas WIGAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WIGAF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WIGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ENDRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, ENDRF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while ENDRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas ENDRF's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENDRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ENDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NVNT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, NVNT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while NVNT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas NVNT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVNT's ROE of +62.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YDRMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, YDRMF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while YDRMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas YDRMF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YDRMF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to YDRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GGAMF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GGAMF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GGAMF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GGAMF's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAMF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GGAMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLITF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, BLITF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while BLITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas BLITF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLITF's ROE of -75.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BLITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PRYNF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, PRYNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while PRYNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas PRYNF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRYNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to PRYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TAPM Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, TAPM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while TAPM trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas TAPM's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAPM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TAPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMETF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GMETF has a market cap of 854.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GMETF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GMETF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMETF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SWMIF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SWMIF has a market cap of 742.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SWMIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SWMIF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWMIF's ROE of +752.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to SWMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs EPYFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, EPYFF has a market cap of 721.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while EPYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas EPYFF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPYFF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to EPYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs KSMRF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, KSMRF has a market cap of 686.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while KSMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas KSMRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSMRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to KSMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IMGX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, IMGX has a market cap of 642K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while IMGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas IMGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FRZT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, FRZT has a market cap of 608K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while FRZT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas FRZT's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRZT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to FRZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs APETF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, APETF has a market cap of 530.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while APETF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas APETF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APETF's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to APETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WGRFF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, WGRFF has a market cap of 452.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while WGRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas WGRFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WGRFF's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WGRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ATIG Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, ATIG has a market cap of 296.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while ATIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas ATIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ATIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IENT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, IENT has a market cap of 150.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while IENT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas IENT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IENT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TIIDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, TIIDF has a market cap of 131.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while TIIDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas TIIDF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIIDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TIIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs PLGC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, PLGC has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while PLGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas PLGC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLGC's ROE of +19.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to PLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs COUV Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, COUV has a market cap of 62.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while COUV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas COUV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COUV's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to COUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs CLIS Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, CLIS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while CLIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas CLIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to CLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs STIE Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, STIE has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while STIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas STIE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STIE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to STIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs LIVC Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, LIVC has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while LIVC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas LIVC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIVC's ROE of +15.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to LIVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WINRW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, WINRW has a market cap of 9.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while WINRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas WINRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WINRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WINRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GMGT Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GMGT has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GMGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GMGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMGT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GMGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs ADTR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, ADTR has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while ADTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas ADTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to ADTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs FASDF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, FASDF has a market cap of 4.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while FASDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas FASDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FASDF's ROE of +16.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to FASDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs VRVR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, VRVR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while VRVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas VRVR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to VRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SPYR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SPYR has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SPYR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SPYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPYR's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SPYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs AXNVF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, AXNVF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while AXNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas AXNVF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXNVF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to AXNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs WINR Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, WINR has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while WINR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas WINR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WINR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to WINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs HTSF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, HTSF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while HTSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas HTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTSF's ROE of -816.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to HTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs TERA Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, TERA has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while TERA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas TERA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TERA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to TERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs BLKCF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, BLKCF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while BLKCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas BLKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLKCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to BLKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs SPLY Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, SPLY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while SPLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas SPLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPLY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to SPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs IPUB Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, IPUB has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while IPUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas IPUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPUB's ROE of +14.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to IPUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs RIVX Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, RIVX has a market cap of 620. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while RIVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas RIVX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIVX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to RIVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs YVRLF Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, YVRLF has a market cap of 483. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while YVRLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas YVRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YVRLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to YVRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs NTEK Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, NTEK has a market cap of 179. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while NTEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas NTEK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTEK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is more volatile compared to NTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.
NTDOF vs GBNW Comparison
NTDOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTDOF stands at 101.4B. In comparison, GBNW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTDOF is priced at $87.09, while GBNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTDOF currently has a P/E ratio of 51.53, whereas GBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTDOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTDOF is less volatile compared to GBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTDOF.