New Technology Acquisition Holdings
New Technology Acquisition Holdings (NTAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAC | $0.00 | +0.00% | 12.1K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XISHY | $8.25 | +7.53% | 3.7B | 26.61 | $0.31 | +3.10% |
| GCPEF | $0.12 | -31.88% | 3.2B | -3.86 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| XNYIF | $0.35 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 17.32 | $0.02 | +3.70% |
| SMTGY | $2.42 | +6.14% | 839.7M | -5.04 | -$0.48 | N/A |
| SMTGF | $23.73 | -0.00% | 823.5M | -5.00 | -$4.75 | +2.20% |
| PXPC | $2.16 | +0.00% | 718.6M | -36.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | +0.00% | 261.1M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +1.26% |
| HYSR | $0.04 | -5.06% | 212.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CSSXF | $0.03 | +0.00% | 75.6M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTAC vs XISHY Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while XISHY trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check XISHY's competition here
NTAC vs GCPEF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while GCPEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check GCPEF's competition here
NTAC vs XNYIF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, XNYIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while XNYIF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNYIF's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XNYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to XNYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check XNYIF's competition here
NTAC vs SMTGY Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SMTGY trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SMTGY's competition here
NTAC vs SMTGF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 823.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SMTGF trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SMTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SMTGF's competition here
NTAC vs PXPC Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while PXPC trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check PXPC's competition here
NTAC vs GRMZF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check GRMZF's competition here
NTAC vs HYSR Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while HYSR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check HYSR's competition here
NTAC vs CSSXF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, CSSXF has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while CSSXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to CSSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check CSSXF's competition here
NTAC vs SPRQF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SPRQF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SPRQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SPRQF's competition here
NTAC vs UGEIF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to UGEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check UGEIF's competition here
NTAC vs CVUEF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while CVUEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check CVUEF's competition here
NTAC vs NEWH Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while NEWH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check NEWH's competition here
NTAC vs FLDI Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check FLDI's competition here
NTAC vs CBUTF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check CBUTF's competition here
NTAC vs SEHLF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SEHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SEHLF's competition here
NTAC vs NTCXF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check NTCXF's competition here
NTAC vs SAENF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SAENF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SAENF's competition here
NTAC vs AACTF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while AACTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to AACTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check AACTF's competition here
NTAC vs TSPG Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to TSPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check TSPG's competition here
NTAC vs PTOS Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while PTOS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to PTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check PTOS's competition here
NTAC vs SIRC Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SIRC's competition here
NTAC vs QCLSF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 621.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check QCLSF's competition here
NTAC vs ANTGF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to ANTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check ANTGF's competition here
NTAC vs PSWW Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 317.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while PSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check PSWW's competition here
NTAC vs SRWRF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 149K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SRWRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SRWRF's competition here
NTAC vs UNSS Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to UNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check UNSS's competition here
NTAC vs SPSO Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SPSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SPSO's competition here
NTAC vs ABCE Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to ABCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check ABCE's competition here
NTAC vs OPVS Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to OPVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check OPVS's competition here
NTAC vs CHJI Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check CHJI's competition here
NTAC vs SOEN Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SOEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SOEN's competition here
NTAC vs SNRS Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to SNRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SNRS's competition here
NTAC vs XDSL Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to XDSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check XDSL's competition here
NTAC vs MBCI Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to MBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check MBCI's competition here
NTAC vs SUNWQ Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to SUNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check SUNWQ's competition here
NTAC vs ISUNQ Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to ISUNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check ISUNQ's competition here
NTAC vs VSOLF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to VSOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check VSOLF's competition here
NTAC vs APVNF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check APVNF's competition here
NTAC vs PPRW Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to PPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check PPRW's competition here
NTAC vs GRYG Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check GRYG's competition here
NTAC vs GSLO Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check GSLO's competition here
NTAC vs EDYYF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check EDYYF's competition here
NTAC vs EBODF Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check EBODF's competition here
NTAC vs IXEH Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to IXEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check IXEH's competition here
NTAC vs KOVR Comparison July 2025
NTAC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAC stands at 12.1K. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44. Regarding current trading prices, NTAC is priced at $0.00, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAC's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAC is more volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAC.Check KOVR's competition here