Net Savings Link, Inc.
Net Savings Link, Inc. NSAV Peers
See (NSAV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSAV | $0.00 | -50.00% | 592.2K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | N/A | 113.8B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.5B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +16.44% |
| MQBKY | $132.85 | -0.11% | 51.2B | 18.50 | $7.18 | +3.10% |
| CIIHF | $2.55 | N/A | 50.2B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.93% |
| CIIHY | $25.04 | N/A | 50B | 11.92 | $2.10 | +4.00% |
| MCQEF | $106.00 | -16.06% | 38.7B | 14.74 | $7.19 | +4.21% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | N/A | 37.2B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +6.12% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.6B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.22% |
| NRSCF | $6.00 | N/A | 17.7B | 7.79 | $0.77 | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
NSAV vs IBKKF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs HAITY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and HAITY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs MQBKY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while MQBKY trades at $132.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CIIHF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CIIHY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CIIHY trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs MCQEF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while MCQEF trades at $106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and MCQEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs GUOSF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs HTNGF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and HTNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs NRSCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CNICF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CMSQF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CMSQF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CMSQY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CMSQY trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs HUATF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and HUATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs DSEEY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DSEEY trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs DSECF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DSECF trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs WSOUF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BRPHF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BRPHF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs IGGHY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while IGGHY trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs IVTJF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs IVTJY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs IGGRF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CLPE Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and CLPE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs CGXYY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CGXYY trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 205.72. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs LTSAP Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while LTSAP trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs PLSQF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and PLSQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs TCAPF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs LTSA Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs FNNTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs MAUSY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs NHMAF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs MNXBF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs DEFTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DEFTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CFNCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs LKADF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and LKADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs CCORF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 717.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CCORF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -26.92. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and CCORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs CNSRF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 702.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CNSRF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CBGPY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 689.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CBGPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and CBGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs CBGPF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 664.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CBGPF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs PHIGW Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs PHIG Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while PHIG trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs NAGGF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CYFRF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CYFRF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 92.33. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CESTY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs ABGSF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CESTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs APPCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs OSHDF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CSCHF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs ABIT Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 188.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs PROP Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while PROP trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs NPPTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while NPPTF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs OZFRY Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while OZFRY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and OZFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs PNPFF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while PNPFF trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CAGPF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs GEVI Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while GEVI trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs STGC Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CURN Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CURN trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 41.08. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs DGTLF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs XAUMF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while XAUMF trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs DYNA Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs ARCNF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs HAFG Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while HAFG trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs UFFRF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and UFFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs DMGGF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DMGGF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CBTTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CBTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BBKCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BBKCF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CMZZF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and CMZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs ARBKF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while ARBKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CRMZ Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and CRMZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs CFLSF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs EBML Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs SMURF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs FDCT Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while FDCT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BCNWF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs FWAV Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and FWAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs BULT Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BULT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs AVFCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and AVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs DPXCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs MATEF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while MATEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs ABSOF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs IHLDF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while IHLDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BTCWF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CCPUF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CCPUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and CCPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs FFTTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs ITEX Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while ITEX trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BLVDF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs HIPH Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and HIPH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs BIDCF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BIDCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs CSTXF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs TRAA Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while TRAA trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs PHIL Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs AAMTF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while AAMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -21.61. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs HYHDF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while HYHDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs DBKSF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while DBKSF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BZRD Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV and BZRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSAV vs CRKR Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BKLIF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs BKBLF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.
NSAV vs GBCHF Comparison
NSAV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSAV stands at 592.2K. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSAV is priced at $0.00, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSAV's ROE is +2.95%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSAV is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSAV.