NSTAR Electric Company
NSTAR Electric Company NSARO Peers
See (NSARO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSARO | $81.70 | +7.76% | 30.01B | N/A | N/A | +5.85% |
| HPIFY | $15.70 | +4.60% | 227.95B | 8.40 | $1.87 | +6.18% |
| NGGTF | $14.13 | +0.31% | 69.25B | 26.17 | $0.54 | +3.15% |
| ELEZY | $14.33 | +2.28% | 30.33B | 14.19 | $1.01 | +3.34% |
| ELEZF | $27.49 | +29.67% | 29.09B | 13.68 | $2.01 | +3.88% |
| NSARP | $71.00 | N/A | 26.08B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| UEPCO | $92.45 | +2.00% | 25.00B | 18.12 | $5.10 | +2.86% |
| CLPHY | $8.51 | -0.61% | 21.50B | 14.42 | $0.59 | +4.50% |
| CLPHF | $8.50 | -0.41% | 21.47B | 14.17 | $0.60 | +4.76% |
| HRNNF | $34.78 | -0.57% | 20.86B | 25.02 | $1.39 | +2.40% |
Stock Comparison
NSARO vs HPIFY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs NGGTF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 69.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while NGGTF trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ELEZY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 30.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ELEZY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ELEZF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs NSARP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 26.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while NSARP trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPCO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 25.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPCO trades at $92.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CLPHY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CLPHY trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CLPHF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CLPHF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HRNNF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 20.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HRNNF trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TERRF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while TERRF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TNABF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while TNABF trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs MAEOY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs AILIO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while AILIO trades at $67.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TNABY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 17.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while TNABY trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CKISF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CKISF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CKISY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CKISY trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EMRAF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while EMRAF trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ELIAF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs RDEIY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while RDEIY trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EQUEY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while EQUEY trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HPIFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs FTRSF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPCN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPCN trades at $75.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPEP trades at $73.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPEO trades at $71.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPCP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPCP trades at $69.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs FORFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPEM trades at $65.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HKVTY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TEZNY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while TEZNY trades at $28.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while UEPEN trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HKCVF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EGIEY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while EGIEY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CPWIF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs IESFY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while IESFY trades at $119.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ABOIF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs WELPM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while WELPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs RGPCF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs WELPP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while WELPP trades at $64.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs AILLM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while AILLM trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs AILLN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while AILLN trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWLM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HAWLM trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs AILIN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while AILIN trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs PGPKY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs AILLP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while AILLP trades at $64.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs FPHHF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.41M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CUPUF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 556.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CUPUF trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs RELFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNTHP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 320.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNTHP trades at $53.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLPL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 316.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLPL trades at $52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ABTZY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 289.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ABTZY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNTHO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 253.48M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNTHO trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNTHN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 245.93M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNTHN trades at $40.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ABZPY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ABZPF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 245.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWEL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 230.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HAWEL trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLHO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLHO trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWLN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 224.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HAWLN trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLHP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 223.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLHP trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLTP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 216.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLTP trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLPM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLTN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 198.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLTN trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWEN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 192.24M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLHN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 189.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLHN trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLTL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EDCFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs NZWFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs SUME Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 33.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while SUME trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs MCPB Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while MCPB trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EUSP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 3.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWEM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 766364.00. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while HAWEM trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs RIGH Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs USWF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47092.00. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EPGRQ Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs RENU Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 30.01B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $81.70, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RENU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.