NSTAR Electric Company
NSTAR Electric Company NSARO Peers
See (NSARO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSARO | $79.00 | +0.01% | 29B | N/A | N/A | +6.05% |
| HPIFY | $15.70 | +4.60% | 227.9B | 8.40 | $1.87 | +6.18% |
| NGGTF | $14.11 | -4.27% | 69.2B | 17.42 | $0.81 | +5.26% |
| ELEZY | $15.69 | +2.21% | 33.2B | 13.53 | $1.16 | +3.18% |
| ELEZF | $29.95 | -5.13% | 31.7B | 12.85 | $2.33 | +3.65% |
| NSARP | $71.00 | N/A | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| HRNNF | $36.63 | -0.22% | 22B | 24.75 | $1.48 | +2.33% |
| CLPHF | $8.41 | -0.83% | 21.2B | 14.25 | $0.59 | +4.81% |
| CLPHY | $8.37 | +0.12% | 21.1B | 14.19 | $0.59 | +4.52% |
| TNABY | $14.09 | +17.42% | 20.5B | 17.40 | $0.81 | +3.31% |
Stock Comparison
NSARO vs HPIFY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs NGGTF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while NGGTF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ELEZY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ELEZY trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ELEZF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ELEZF trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs NSARP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while NSARP trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and NSARP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs HRNNF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HRNNF trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CLPHF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CLPHF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CLPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CLPHY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CLPHY trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TNABY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while TNABY trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TERRF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while TERRF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TNABF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while TNABF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and TNABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs MAEOY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and MAEOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs AILIO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while AILIO trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CKISF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CKISF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CKISY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CKISY trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EMRAF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EMRAF trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ELIAF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and ELIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs RDEIY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while RDEIY trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPCO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPCO trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EQUEY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EQUEY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HPIFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs FTRSF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPCN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPCN trades at $76.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and UEPCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs UEPEP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPEP trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPEO trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and UEPEO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs UEPCP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPCP trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs FORFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs TEZNY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while TEZNY trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPEM trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HKVTY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs UEPEN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while UEPEN trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EGIEY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EGIEY trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HKCVF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HKCVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CPWIF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs IESFY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while IESFY trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and IESFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs ABOIF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and ABOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs WELPM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while WELPM trades at $110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and WELPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs RGPCF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and RGPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs WELPP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while WELPP trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and WELPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs AILLM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while AILLM trades at $78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and AILLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs AILLN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while AILLN trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWLM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWLM trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HAWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs AILIN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while AILIN trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs PGPKY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and PGPKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs AILLP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while AILLP trades at $63.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and AILLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs FPHHF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and FPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CUPUF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CUPUF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CUPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs RELFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and RELFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs ABTZY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ABTZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and ABTZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLPL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLPL trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNTHP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNTHP trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ABZPF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and ABZPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNTHO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNTHO trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ABZPY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWEL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWEL trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HAWEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNTHN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNTHN trades at $39.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNTHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLHO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLHO trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLHP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLHP trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWLN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWLN trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs CNLTP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLTP trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLPM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLTN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLTN trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLHN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLHN trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs HAWEN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HAWEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs CNLTL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 188.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while CNLTL trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and CNLTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs EDCFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs NZWFF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and NZWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs SUME Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while SUME trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EUSP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EUSP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs MCPB Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while MCPB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs HAWEM Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 742.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWEM trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HAWEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs RIGH Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs USWF Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and USWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs EPGRQ Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs RENU Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RENU's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs IPWLP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, IPWLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and IPWLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs IPWLG Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, IPWLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and IPWLG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs HAWLL Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWLL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWLL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and HAWLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs HAWLI Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, HAWLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while HAWLI trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs BANGN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, BANGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and BANGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs NMPWP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, NMPWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while NMPWP trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs ENIAY Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, ENIAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs EVSO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, EVSO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs AILIP Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, AILIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while AILIP trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and AILIP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs IPWLN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, IPWLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and IPWLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs NEWEN Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, NEWEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.
NSARO vs IPWLO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, IPWLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO and IPWLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NSARO vs PNMXO Comparison
NSARO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSARO stands at 29B. In comparison, PNMXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSARO is priced at $79.00, while PNMXO trades at $74.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSARO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSARO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSARO is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSARO.