Naspers Limited
Naspers Limited NPSNY Peers
See (NPSNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPSNY | $61.65 | +0.03% | 50B | 10.24 | $6.02 | +0.15% |
| TCTZF | $66.11 | +4.91% | 601.1B | 23.20 | $2.85 | +0.87% |
| TCEHY | $63.57 | -0.34% | 580.3B | 22.31 | $2.85 | +0.91% |
| PROSY | $10.94 | +0.37% | 123.5B | 10.62 | $1.03 | +0.20% |
| PROSF | $55.25 | -0.81% | 120.8B | 10.71 | $5.16 | +0.20% |
| NAPRF | $306.70 | +0.00% | 49.7B | 10.19 | $30.09 | +0.21% |
| KUASF | $8.12 | +14.98% | 35B | 16.92 | $0.48 | N/A |
| KSHTY | $1.51 | +0.00% | 32.9B | 15.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| BAIDF | $10.67 | +0.14% | 29.9B | 8.46 | $1.26 | N/A |
| YAHOF | $3.73 | +0.00% | 26.6B | 26.64 | $0.14 | +1.25% |
Stock Comparison
NPSNY vs TCTZF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 601.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while TCTZF trades at $66.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs TCEHY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 580.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while TCEHY trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs PROSY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while PROSY trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs PROSF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while PROSF trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs NAPRF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while NAPRF trades at $306.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs KUASF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while KUASF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs KSHTY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while KSHTY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs BAIDF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while BAIDF trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs YAHOF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while YAHOF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RPGRY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RPGRY trades at $40.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RPGRF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs NHNCF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ADEVF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ADEVY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ATDRF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ATDRF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ATDRY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ATDRY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs CSXXY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while CSXXY trades at $45.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RTMVF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RTMVF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RTMVY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RTMVY trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SKLTF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SKLTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs KKKUF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while KKKUF trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs CHLLF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while CHLLF trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs OOOOF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MEIUF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs HMNTY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while HMNTY trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs DHGAF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MLRYY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs XINXF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ADBMF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs WNWSF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ZGXNF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs FRRGF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs VYGPF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MECVF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs UUMMF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs OPNDF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs TGRVF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs NXCLF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ZMDTF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ZMDTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs CKPDY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RSTN Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs CPADF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MSEZ Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MSEZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs BBUZ Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while BBUZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs PXSTF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RDLYF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SABOF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SABOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -35.44. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs PRSNF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs NIROF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs BMTM Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while BMTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs HYPPF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs BBTVF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs EGLXF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs NUGL Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SFUNY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs CRTDW Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs YOOIF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while YOOIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs GIFX Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while GIFX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs LBUY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MRNJ Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs QQQFF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MRPT Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MRPT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs GOGY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs LTCP Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs APMLF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 941.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SPFYF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 636.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SPFYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs CYAP Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs FMHS Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 591.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while FMHS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs QTTOY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 532.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while QTTOY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ILIM Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs VMSI Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 506.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RBDC Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs DGTHF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 287.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs LKST Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 247.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SEEK Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs KIWB Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ZONX Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs OTTV Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs LHGI Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SLNM Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RWRDP Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs HUTN Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs DELCF Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs REDFY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs BTIM Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs PIKL Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ISHM Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs SHGY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs MDAW Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs LOCM Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ROII Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs DATI Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs LOVLQ Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ZZLL Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs FRFR Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs INTH Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs ABBY Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs RAIO Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.
NPSNY vs YITD Comparison
NPSNY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPSNY stands at 50B. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, NPSNY is priced at $61.65, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPSNY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.24, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPSNY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPSNY is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPSNY.