Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.
Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. (NPPNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NPPNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPPNY | $5.37 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 6.55 | $0.82 | N/A |
| MKGAF | $133.15 | +0.43% | 58.4B | 17.51 | $7.67 | +1.87% |
| MKKGY | $26.33 | +1.74% | 57.2B | 17.20 | $1.53 | +1.90% |
| TKPHF | $31.00 | +13.35% | 48.4B | 53.45 | $0.58 | +4.29% |
| IPSEY | $34.09 | +0.96% | 45.1B | 21.85 | $1.56 | +0.76% |
| HLNCF | $4.92 | +0.41% | 44.1B | 21.37 | $0.23 | +2.06% |
| SDZNY | $62.78 | +3.38% | 27.1B | 121.15 | $0.52 | +1.08% |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| TEVJF | $14.32 | +0.00% | 16.4B | -95.47 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| SGIOF | $17.70 | -6.84% | 15.1B | 13.01 | $1.36 | +4.60% |
Stock Comparison
NPPNY vs MKGAF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while MKGAF trades at $133.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check MKGAF's competition here
NPPNY vs MKKGY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while MKKGY trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check MKKGY's competition here
NPPNY vs TKPHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TKPHF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TKPHF's competition here
NPPNY vs IPSEY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while IPSEY trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check IPSEY's competition here
NPPNY vs HLNCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HLNCF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HLNCF's competition here
NPPNY vs SDZNY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SDZNY trades at $62.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is 121.15. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SDZNY's competition here
NPPNY vs ESALY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ESALY's competition here
NPPNY vs TEVJF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TEVJF trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -95.47. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TEVJF's competition here
NPPNY vs SGIOF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SGIOF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SGIOF's competition here
NPPNY vs SGIOY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SGIOY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SGIOY's competition here
NPPNY vs BIOVF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while BIOVF trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check BIOVF's competition here
NPPNY vs SFOSF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SFOSF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SFOSF's competition here
NPPNY vs IPSEF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check IPSEF's competition here
NPPNY vs ESAIY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ESAIY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ESAIY's competition here
NPPNY vs ESALF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ESALF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ESALF's competition here
NPPNY vs GZPHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while GZPHF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check GZPHF's competition here
NPPNY vs HKMPF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HKMPF trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to HKMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HKMPF's competition here
NPPNY vs HKMPY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HKMPY trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HKMPY's competition here
NPPNY vs SGFEF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SGFEF trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SGFEF's competition here
NPPNY vs WIBFF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check WIBFF's competition here
NPPNY vs HLUBF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HLUBF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HLUBF's competition here
NPPNY vs HLBBF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HLBBF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HLBBF's competition here
NPPNY vs LVZPF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LVZPF's competition here
NPPNY vs SMDPY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SMDPY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SMDPY's competition here
NPPNY vs DNPUF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while DNPUF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check DNPUF's competition here
NPPNY vs CHSYF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CHSYF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CHSYF's competition here
NPPNY vs ULIHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ULIHF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ULIHF's competition here
NPPNY vs APNHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check APNHF's competition here
NPPNY vs INVVY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check INVVY's competition here
NPPNY vs IZQVF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check IZQVF's competition here
NPPNY vs LBTSF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LBTSF trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 121.45. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LBTSF's competition here
NPPNY vs HMDCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HMDCF's competition here
NPPNY vs HYPMY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HYPMY trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HYPMY's competition here
NPPNY vs APNHY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while APNHY trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check APNHY's competition here
NPPNY vs THCBF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check THCBF's competition here
NPPNY vs CASBF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CASBF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -29.81. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CASBF's competition here
NPPNY vs CURLF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CURLF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CURLF's competition here
NPPNY vs DMPHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check DMPHF's competition here
NPPNY vs HTSUF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HTSUF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HTSUF's competition here
NPPNY vs LJUIF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LJUIF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LJUIF's competition here
NPPNY vs GTBIF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while GTBIF trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 78.09. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check GTBIF's competition here
NPPNY vs TSMRF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TSMRF trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TSMRF's competition here
NPPNY vs ARSUF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ARSUF's competition here
NPPNY vs NPNKF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check NPNKF's competition here
NPPNY vs MITPF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check MITPF's competition here
NPPNY vs TCNNF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TCNNF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TCNNF's competition here
NPPNY vs KARBF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check KARBF's competition here
NPPNY vs SHEZF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SHEZF's competition here
NPPNY vs CHIZF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CHIZF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CHIZF's competition here
NPPNY vs SWGHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SWGHF's competition here
NPPNY vs KSPHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while KSPHF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check KSPHF's competition here
NPPNY vs EVOTF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while EVOTF trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check EVOTF's competition here
NPPNY vs GNMLF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while GNMLF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check GNMLF's competition here
NPPNY vs KKPCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while KKPCF trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check KKPCF's competition here
NPPNY vs NIKA Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 972.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while NIKA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check NIKA's competition here
NPPNY vs BIOGY Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 961M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while BIOGY trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check BIOGY's competition here
NPPNY vs SHPHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SHPHF's competition here
NPPNY vs LVTTF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 891.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LVTTF's competition here
NPPNY vs EVRRF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 887.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to EVRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check EVRRF's competition here
NPPNY vs NRXCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 842.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to NRXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check NRXCF's competition here
NPPNY vs TWAPF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TWAPF's competition here
NPPNY vs CSWYF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CSWYF's competition here
NPPNY vs TRXPF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TRXPF's competition here
NPPNY vs SWDCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SWDCF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SWDCF's competition here
NPPNY vs YIHCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check YIHCF's competition here
NPPNY vs TRSSF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check TRSSF's competition here
NPPNY vs AIHLF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 593.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while AIHLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check AIHLF's competition here
NPPNY vs VRNOF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while VRNOF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check VRNOF's competition here
NPPNY vs ELTP Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ELTP trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -54.10. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ELTP's competition here
NPPNY vs GLASF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 564.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while GLASF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check GLASF's competition here
NPPNY vs PKBFF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check PKBFF's competition here
NPPNY vs CCHWF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CCHWF's competition here
NPPNY vs KHTRF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 464.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while KHTRF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 66.57. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check KHTRF's competition here
NPPNY vs PEXXF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check PEXXF's competition here
NPPNY vs CRLBF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 429M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CRLBF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CRLBF's competition here
NPPNY vs BOIRF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while BOIRF trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check BOIRF's competition here
NPPNY vs AGYTF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -13.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check AGYTF's competition here
NPPNY vs HUMDF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 404.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HUMDF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HUMDF's competition here
NPPNY vs CPHRF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CPHRF trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CPHRF's competition here
NPPNY vs BHCCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check BHCCF's competition here
NPPNY vs BIOIF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BIOIF has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while BIOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BIOIF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIOIF's ROE of -10.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to BIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check BIOIF's competition here
NPPNY vs PLNHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check PLNHF's competition here
NPPNY vs CBWTF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CBWTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CBWTF's competition here
NPPNY vs PHCUF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while PHCUF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is -293.74. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check PHCUF's competition here
NPPNY vs AAWH Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while AAWH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check AAWH's competition here
NPPNY vs JUSHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while JUSHF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check JUSHF's competition here
NPPNY vs COPHF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check COPHF's competition here
NPPNY vs STMH Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while STMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check STMH's competition here
NPPNY vs NWPN Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check NWPN's competition here
NPPNY vs LOVFF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LOVFF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LOVFF's competition here
NPPNY vs HLTRF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while HLTRF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check HLTRF's competition here
NPPNY vs SHIEF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIEF has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while SHIEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SHIEF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHIEF's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to SHIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check SHIEF's competition here
NPPNY vs LPCUF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LPCUF's competition here
NPPNY vs CNVCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of -3.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check CNVCF's competition here
NPPNY vs GRUSF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while GRUSF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check GRUSF's competition here
NPPNY vs BIOYF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while BIOYF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check BIOYF's competition here
NPPNY vs PLNH Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while PLNH trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check PLNH's competition here
NPPNY vs LRDSF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check LRDSF's competition here
NPPNY vs ABSCF Comparison August 2025
NPPNY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NPPNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NPPNY is priced at $5.37, while ABSCF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NPPNY currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, NPPNY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NPPNY is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NPPNY.Check ABSCF's competition here