Noida Toll Bridge Company Limited
Noida Toll Bridge Company Limited (NOIDATOLL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NOIDATOLL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Infrastructure Operations Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOIDATOLL.NS | ₹3.79 | -2.82% | 707.5M | 2.57 | ₹1.48 | N/A |
| IRB.BO | ₹41.08 | +2.14% | 242.8B | 31.65 | ₹1.27 | +0.52% |
| IRB.NS | ₹41.10 | +2.09% | 242.5B | 31.62 | ₹1.27 | +0.52% |
| GMRP&UI.NS | ₹121.97 | +3.99% | 92.4B | 10.04 | ₹11.78 | N/A |
| IRBINVIT.NS | ₹61.60 | +0.29% | 35.7B | 9.72 | ₹6.32 | +11.39% |
| HILINFRA.NS | ₹55.55 | -2.30% | 4.1B | 11.65 | ₹4.90 | N/A |
| HILINFRA.BO | ₹55.52 | -2.34% | 4.1B | 11.60 | ₹4.90 | N/A |
| MARKOLINES.NS | ₹159.10 | -0.90% | 3.5B | 13.52 | ₹11.58 | +0.96% |
| ATLANTAA.BO | ₹39.72 | -2.34% | 3.3B | -23.83 | -₹1.72 | N/A |
| ATLANTAA.NS | ₹39.97 | -1.99% | 3.3B | -23.66 | -₹1.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NOIDATOLL.NS vs IRB.BO Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, IRB.BO has a market cap of 242.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while IRB.BO trades at ₹41.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas IRB.BO's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to IRB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to IRB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check IRB.BO's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs IRB.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, IRB.NS has a market cap of 242.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while IRB.NS trades at ₹41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas IRB.NS's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to IRB.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to IRB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check IRB.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs GMRP&UI.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, GMRP&UI.NS has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while GMRP&UI.NS trades at ₹121.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GMRP&UI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GMRP&UI.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to GMRP&UI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check GMRP&UI.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs IRBINVIT.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, IRBINVIT.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while IRBINVIT.NS trades at ₹61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas IRBINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to IRBINVIT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to IRBINVIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check IRBINVIT.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs HILINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, HILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while HILINFRA.NS trades at ₹55.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas HILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to HILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to HILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check HILINFRA.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs HILINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, HILINFRA.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while HILINFRA.BO trades at ₹55.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas HILINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to HILINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to HILINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check HILINFRA.BO's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs MARKOLINES.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, MARKOLINES.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while MARKOLINES.NS trades at ₹159.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MARKOLINES.NS's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MARKOLINES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to MARKOLINES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check MARKOLINES.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs ATLANTAA.BO Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, ATLANTAA.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while ATLANTAA.BO trades at ₹39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ATLANTAA.BO's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ATLANTAA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to ATLANTAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check ATLANTAA.BO's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs ATLANTAA.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, ATLANTAA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while ATLANTAA.NS trades at ₹39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ATLANTAA.NS's P/E ratio is -23.66. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ATLANTAA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to ATLANTAA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check ATLANTAA.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs ATLANTA.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, ATLANTA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while ATLANTA.NS trades at ₹24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ATLANTA.NS's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ATLANTA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to ATLANTA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check ATLANTA.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs JPINFRATEC.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, JPINFRATEC.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while JPINFRATEC.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas JPINFRATEC.NS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to JPINFRATEC.NS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to JPINFRATEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check JPINFRATEC.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs BRNL.BO Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, BRNL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while BRNL.BO trades at ₹19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BRNL.BO's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BRNL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to BRNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check BRNL.BO's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs BRNL.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, BRNL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while BRNL.NS trades at ₹19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas BRNL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to BRNL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to BRNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check BRNL.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs ARSSINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, ARSSINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while ARSSINFRA.NS trades at ₹54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas ARSSINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to ARSSINFRA.NS's ROE of -20.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to ARSSINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check ARSSINFRA.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs IL&FSTRANS.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, IL&FSTRANS.NS has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while IL&FSTRANS.NS trades at ₹2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas IL&FSTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to IL&FSTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to IL&FSTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check IL&FSTRANS.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs NOIDATOLL.BO Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, NOIDATOLL.BO has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while NOIDATOLL.BO trades at ₹3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas NOIDATOLL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to NOIDATOLL.BO's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to NOIDATOLL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check NOIDATOLL.BO's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs AJRINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, AJRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 659.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while AJRINFRA.NS trades at ₹0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas AJRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to AJRINFRA.NS's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to AJRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check AJRINFRA.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs GAYAHWS.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, GAYAHWS.NS has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while GAYAHWS.NS trades at ₹2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GAYAHWS.NS's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GAYAHWS.NS's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is less volatile compared to GAYAHWS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check GAYAHWS.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs MEP.BO Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, MEP.BO has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while MEP.BO trades at ₹1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MEP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MEP.BO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to MEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check MEP.BO's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs MEP.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, MEP.NS has a market cap of 196.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while MEP.NS trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas MEP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to MEP.NS's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to MEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check MEP.NS's competition here
NOIDATOLL.NS vs GAMMNINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
NOIDATOLL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOIDATOLL.NS stands at 707.5M. In comparison, GAMMNINFRA.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOIDATOLL.NS is priced at ₹3.79, while GAMMNINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOIDATOLL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.57, whereas GAMMNINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NOIDATOLL.NS's ROE is +1.34%, compared to GAMMNINFRA.NS's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NOIDATOLL.NS is more volatile compared to GAMMNINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOIDATOLL.NS.Check GAMMNINFRA.NS's competition here