Tencent Holdings Limited
Tencent Holdings Limited (NNND.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NNND.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNND.F | €60.70 | -0.30% | 549.2B | 24.48 | €2.47 | +6.37% |
ABEC.F | €172.50 | +1.77% | 2.1T | 21.32 | €8.09 | +0.42% |
ABEA.F | €171.86 | +1.73% | 2.1T | 21.22 | €8.09 | +0.43% |
ABEC.DE | €172.28 | +2.18% | 2.1T | 21.30 | €8.09 | +0.42% |
ABEA.DE | €171.46 | +2.11% | 2.1T | 21.19 | €8.09 | +0.43% |
FB2A.DE | €610.30 | -1.15% | 1.5T | 27.69 | €22.04 | +0.31% |
FB2A.F | €607.00 | -0.31% | 1.5T | 27.54 | €22.04 | +0.31% |
1TY.DE | €50.55 | -0.88% | 110.5B | 11.51 | €4.39 | +0.20% |
B1C.F | €75.90 | +1.07% | 27.2B | 8.68 | €8.64 | N/A |
1SI.DE | €8.17 | -0.22% | 13.9B | -31.43 | -€0.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NNND.F vs ABEC.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, ABEC.F has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while ABEC.F trades at €172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas ABEC.F's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEC.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to ABEC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check ABEC.F's competition here
NNND.F vs ABEA.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, ABEA.F has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while ABEA.F trades at €171.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas ABEA.F's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEA.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to ABEA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check ABEA.F's competition here
NNND.F vs ABEC.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, ABEC.DE has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while ABEC.DE trades at €172.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas ABEC.DE's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEC.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F and ABEC.DE have similar daily volatility (1.74).Check ABEC.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs ABEA.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, ABEA.DE has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while ABEA.DE trades at €171.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas ABEA.DE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to ABEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check ABEA.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs FB2A.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, FB2A.DE has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while FB2A.DE trades at €610.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas FB2A.DE's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FB2A.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to FB2A.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check FB2A.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs FB2A.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, FB2A.F has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while FB2A.F trades at €607.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas FB2A.F's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FB2A.F's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to FB2A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check FB2A.F's competition here
NNND.F vs 1TY.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, 1TY.DE has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while 1TY.DE trades at €50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas 1TY.DE's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1TY.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to 1TY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check 1TY.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs B1C.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, B1C.F has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while B1C.F trades at €75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas B1C.F's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B1C.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to B1C.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check B1C.F's competition here
NNND.F vs 1SI.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, 1SI.DE has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while 1SI.DE trades at €8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas 1SI.DE's P/E ratio is -31.43. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1SI.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to 1SI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check 1SI.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs 1MO.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, 1MO.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while 1MO.F trades at €7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas 1MO.F's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1MO.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to 1MO.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check 1MO.F's competition here
NNND.F vs NWO.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, NWO.DE has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while NWO.DE trades at €66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas NWO.DE's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWO.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to NWO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check NWO.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs HTG.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, HTG.F has a market cap of 294.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while HTG.F trades at €1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas HTG.F's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTG.F's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to HTG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check HTG.F's competition here
NNND.F vs HTG.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, HTG.DE has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while HTG.DE trades at €1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas HTG.DE's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTG.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to HTG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check HTG.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs HOC.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, HOC.DE has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while HOC.DE trades at €2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas HOC.DE's P/E ratio is -47.68. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOC.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to HOC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check HOC.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs 8HC.DU Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, 8HC.DU has a market cap of 409.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while 8HC.DU trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas 8HC.DU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 8HC.DU's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to 8HC.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check 8HC.DU's competition here
NNND.F vs PU11.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, PU11.DE has a market cap of 196.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while PU11.DE trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas PU11.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PU11.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to PU11.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check PU11.DE's competition here
NNND.F vs PU11.F Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, PU11.F has a market cap of 196.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while PU11.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas PU11.F's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PU11.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to PU11.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check PU11.F's competition here
NNND.F vs TWR.DE Comparison July 2025
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 549.2B. In comparison, TWR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €60.70, while TWR.DE trades at €53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.48, whereas TWR.DE's P/E ratio is 224.75. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TWR.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to TWR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.Check TWR.DE's competition here