Tencent Holdings Limited
Tencent Holdings Limited NNND.F Peers
See (NNND.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNND.F | €55.93 | -1.55% | 509.4B | 22.64 | €2.47 | +0.95% |
| ABEC.DE | €153.32 | +0.10% | 1.8T | 19.51 | €7.86 | +0.41% |
| ABEA.DE | €152.26 | +0.20% | 1.8T | 19.40 | €7.85 | +0.42% |
| ABEC.F | €153.36 | +0.13% | 1.8T | 19.51 | €7.86 | +0.41% |
| ABEA.F | €151.60 | -0.13% | 1.8T | 19.31 | €7.85 | +0.42% |
| FB2A.DE | €598.50 | -0.10% | 1.5T | 26.81 | €22.32 | +0.28% |
| FB2A.F | €592.90 | -0.64% | 1.5T | 26.58 | €22.31 | +0.28% |
| 1TY.DE | €45.92 | -3.09% | 100.4B | 16.34 | €2.81 | +0.19% |
| B1C.F | €74.50 | -1.32% | 26B | 8.41 | €8.86 | N/A |
| 1SI.DE | €7.48 | +0.43% | 12.4B | -27.69 | -€0.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NNND.F vs ABEC.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, ABEC.DE has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while ABEC.DE trades at €153.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas ABEC.DE's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEC.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to ABEC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs ABEA.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, ABEA.DE has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while ABEA.DE trades at €152.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas ABEA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to ABEA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs ABEC.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, ABEC.F has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while ABEC.F trades at €153.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas ABEC.F's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEC.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to ABEC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs ABEA.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, ABEA.F has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while ABEA.F trades at €151.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas ABEA.F's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABEA.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to ABEA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs FB2A.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, FB2A.DE has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while FB2A.DE trades at €598.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas FB2A.DE's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FB2A.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to FB2A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs FB2A.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, FB2A.F has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while FB2A.F trades at €592.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas FB2A.F's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FB2A.F's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to FB2A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs 1TY.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, 1TY.DE has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while 1TY.DE trades at €45.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas 1TY.DE's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1TY.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to 1TY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs B1C.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, B1C.F has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while B1C.F trades at €74.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas B1C.F's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B1C.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to B1C.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs 1SI.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, 1SI.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while 1SI.DE trades at €7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas 1SI.DE's P/E ratio is -27.69. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1SI.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F and 1SI.DE have similar daily volatility (1.32).
NNND.F vs 1MO.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, 1MO.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while 1MO.F trades at €7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas 1MO.F's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1MO.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to 1MO.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs NWO.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, NWO.DE has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while NWO.DE trades at €66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas NWO.DE's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWO.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to NWO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs HOC.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, HOC.DE has a market cap of 232.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while HOC.DE trades at €2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas HOC.DE's P/E ratio is -47.68. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOC.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to HOC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs HTG.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, HTG.DE has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while HTG.DE trades at €1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas HTG.DE's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTG.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to HTG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs HTG.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, HTG.F has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while HTG.F trades at €1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas HTG.F's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTG.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to HTG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs 8HC.DU Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, 8HC.DU has a market cap of 350K. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while 8HC.DU trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas 8HC.DU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 8HC.DU's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to 8HC.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs PU11.F Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, PU11.F has a market cap of 252.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while PU11.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas PU11.F's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PU11.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is more volatile compared to PU11.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs PU11.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, PU11.DE has a market cap of 157.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while PU11.DE trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas PU11.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PU11.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to PU11.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.
NNND.F vs TWR.DE Comparison
NNND.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNND.F stands at 509.4B. In comparison, TWR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NNND.F is priced at €55.93, while TWR.DE trades at €53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNND.F currently has a P/E ratio of 22.64, whereas TWR.DE's P/E ratio is 224.75. In terms of profitability, NNND.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TWR.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNND.F is less volatile compared to TWR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNND.F.