Nanomix Corporation
Nanomix Corporation (NNMX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NNMX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNMX | $0.00 | N/A | 9.8K | -0.00 | -$0.31 | N/A |
| SMMNY | $24.64 | -0.39% | 111B | 22.00 | $1.12 | +1.49% |
| SEMHF | $50.40 | +4.28% | 56.3B | 22.60 | $2.23 | +2.34% |
| RYLPF | $31.47 | -4.65% | 29.9B | 28.09 | $1.12 | +3.04% |
| SONVF | $260.00 | +4.17% | 15.5B | 23.05 | $11.28 | +2.18% |
| SNNUF | $18.00 | +8.50% | 15.3B | 32.14 | $0.56 | +2.30% |
| SONVY | $50.57 | +1.00% | 15.1B | 22.38 | $2.26 | +2.15% |
| CHEOY | $70.19 | +2.59% | 9.2B | 37.74 | $1.86 | +1.92% |
| CHEOF | $135.68 | -24.90% | 8.9B | 33.01 | $4.11 | +1.53% |
| WILYY | $13.84 | N/A | 6.1B | 15.55 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NNMX vs SMMNY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SMMNY has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SMMNY trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMMNY's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SMMNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to SMMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check SMMNY's competition here
NNMX vs SEMHF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SEMHF has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SEMHF trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEMHF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SEMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and SEMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEMHF's competition here
NNMX vs RYLPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, RYLPF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while RYLPF trades at $31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RYLPF's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RYLPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to RYLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check RYLPF's competition here
NNMX vs SONVF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SONVF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SONVF trades at $260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SONVF's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SONVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to SONVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check SONVF's competition here
NNMX vs SNNUF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SNNUF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SNNUF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNNUF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SNNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and SNNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNNUF's competition here
NNMX vs SONVY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SONVY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SONVY trades at $50.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SONVY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SONVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to SONVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check SONVY's competition here
NNMX vs CHEOY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CHEOY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CHEOY trades at $70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHEOY's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CHEOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to CHEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check CHEOY's competition here
NNMX vs CHEOF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CHEOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CHEOF trades at $135.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHEOF's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CHEOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and CHEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHEOF's competition here
NNMX vs WILYY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, WILYY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while WILYY trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WILYY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to WILYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to WILYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check WILYY's competition here
NNMX vs GNGBY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, GNGBY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while GNGBY trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GNGBY's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to GNGBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to GNGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check GNGBY's competition here
NNMX vs WILLF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, WILLF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while WILLF trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WILLF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to WILLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and WILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WILLF's competition here
NNMX vs GNGBF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, GNGBF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while GNGBF trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GNGBF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to GNGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and GNGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNGBF's competition here
NNMX vs AMBFF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, AMBFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while AMBFF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMBFF's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to AMBFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to AMBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check AMBFF's competition here
NNMX vs NHNKY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, NHNKY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while NHNKY trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NHNKY's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to NHNKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to NHNKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check NHNKY's competition here
NNMX vs AMBBY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, AMBBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while AMBBY trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMBBY's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to AMBBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and AMBBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMBBY's competition here
NNMX vs MCRPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, MCRPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while MCRPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MCRPF's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MCRPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and MCRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCRPF's competition here
NNMX vs NHNKF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, NHNKF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while NHNKF trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NHNKF's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to NHNKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to NHNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check NHNKF's competition here
NNMX vs GGNDF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, GGNDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while GGNDF trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GGNDF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to GGNDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and GGNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGNDF's competition here
NNMX vs GNNDY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, GNNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while GNNDY trades at $43.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GNNDY's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to GNNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and GNNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNNDY's competition here
NNMX vs DRWKF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, DRWKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while DRWKF trades at $111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DRWKF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DRWKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and DRWKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRWKF's competition here
NNMX vs OSSFF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, OSSFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while OSSFF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OSSFF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to OSSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to OSSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check OSSFF's competition here
NNMX vs OSSUY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, OSSUY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while OSSUY trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OSSUY's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to OSSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to OSSUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check OSSUY's competition here
NNMX vs DWRKF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, DWRKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while DWRKF trades at $543.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DWRKF's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DWRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and DWRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWRKF's competition here
NNMX vs MEDGF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, MEDGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while MEDGF trades at $83.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MEDGF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MEDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and MEDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEDGF's competition here
NNMX vs STSEY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, STSEY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while STSEY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STSEY's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to STSEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to STSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check STSEY's competition here
NNMX vs DGWPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, DGWPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while DGWPF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DGWPF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DGWPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and DGWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGWPF's competition here
NNMX vs ELEAF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ELEAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ELEAF trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELEAF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ELEAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to ELEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check ELEAF's competition here
NNMX vs VTRLY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, VTRLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while VTRLY trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VTRLY's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VTRLY's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and VTRLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTRLY's competition here
NNMX vs FDMDF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, FDMDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while FDMDF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FDMDF's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FDMDF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to FDMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check FDMDF's competition here
NNMX vs MDRSF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, MDRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while MDRSF trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDRSF's P/E ratio is -1666.67. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MDRSF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to MDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check MDRSF's competition here
NNMX vs LFTSF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, LFTSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while LFTSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LFTSF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to LFTSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and LFTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LFTSF's competition here
NNMX vs XVIPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, XVIPF has a market cap of 607.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while XVIPF trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XVIPF's P/E ratio is 214.44. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to XVIPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to XVIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check XVIPF's competition here
NNMX vs IOBCF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, IOBCF has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while IOBCF trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IOBCF's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to IOBCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and IOBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOBCF's competition here
NNMX vs AVMR Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, AVMR has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while AVMR trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVMR's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to AVMR's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and AVMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVMR's competition here
NNMX vs CALZF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CALZF has a market cap of 472.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CALZF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CALZF's P/E ratio is 68.45. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CALZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to CALZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check CALZF's competition here
NNMX vs BRSYF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, BRSYF has a market cap of 451.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while BRSYF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BRSYF's P/E ratio is 72.13. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to BRSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and BRSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRSYF's competition here
NNMX vs CYBQY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CYBQY has a market cap of 413.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CYBQY trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYBQY's P/E ratio is -232.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CYBQY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and CYBQY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBQY's competition here
NNMX vs CSSPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CSSPF has a market cap of 384.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CSSPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CSSPF's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CSSPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to CSSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check CSSPF's competition here
NNMX vs CLVSF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CLVSF has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CLVSF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLVSF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CLVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and CLVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLVSF's competition here
NNMX vs HYBT Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, HYBT has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while HYBT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HYBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to HYBT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and HYBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYBT's competition here
NNMX vs DMTRF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, DMTRF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while DMTRF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DMTRF's P/E ratio is -118.50. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DMTRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to DMTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check DMTRF's competition here
NNMX vs CYBQF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CYBQF has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CYBQF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYBQF's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CYBQF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to CYBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check CYBQF's competition here
NNMX vs HTLZF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, HTLZF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while HTLZF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HTLZF's P/E ratio is -159.01. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to HTLZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and HTLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTLZF's competition here
NNMX vs EAPIF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, EAPIF has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while EAPIF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EAPIF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to EAPIF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and EAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EAPIF's competition here
NNMX vs IMPZY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, IMPZY has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while IMPZY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IMPZY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to IMPZY's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and IMPZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPZY's competition here
NNMX vs VMTHF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, VMTHF has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while VMTHF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VMTHF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VMTHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and VMTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMTHF's competition here
NNMX vs DTXMF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, DTXMF has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while DTXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DTXMF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DTXMF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to DTXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check DTXMF's competition here
NNMX vs PXMBF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, PXMBF has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while PXMBF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PXMBF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to PXMBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and PXMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMBF's competition here
NNMX vs EKDHF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, EKDHF has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while EKDHF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EKDHF's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to EKDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to EKDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check EKDHF's competition here
NNMX vs CLLKF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CLLKF has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CLLKF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLLKF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CLLKF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to CLLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check CLLKF's competition here
NNMX vs AMEUF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, AMEUF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while AMEUF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMEUF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to AMEUF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to AMEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check AMEUF's competition here
NNMX vs SOMNF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SOMNF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SOMNF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SOMNF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SOMNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and SOMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMNF's competition here
NNMX vs BCCOY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, BCCOY has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while BCCOY trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCCOY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to BCCOY's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to BCCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check BCCOY's competition here
NNMX vs AVHHL Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, AVHHL has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while AVHHL trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVHHL's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to AVHHL's ROE of +4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and AVHHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVHHL's competition here
NNMX vs JMDMF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, JMDMF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while JMDMF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JMDMF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to JMDMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to JMDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check JMDMF's competition here
NNMX vs RSHUF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, RSHUF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while RSHUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RSHUF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RSHUF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to RSHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check RSHUF's competition here
NNMX vs CKMTF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CKMTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CKMTF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CKMTF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CKMTF's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and CKMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKMTF's competition here
NNMX vs SNZZF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, SNZZF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while SNZZF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNZZF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to SNZZF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to SNZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check SNZZF's competition here
NNMX vs BLOZF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, BLOZF has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while BLOZF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLOZF's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to BLOZF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to BLOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check BLOZF's competition here
NNMX vs TLTFF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, TLTFF has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while TLTFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TLTFF's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to TLTFF's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to TLTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check TLTFF's competition here
NNMX vs BRNHF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, BRNHF has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while BRNHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BRNHF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to BRNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and BRNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRNHF's competition here
NNMX vs RDGL Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, RDGL has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while RDGL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RDGL's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RDGL's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to RDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check RDGL's competition here
NNMX vs NVYTF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, NVYTF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while NVYTF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NVYTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to NVYTF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and NVYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYTF's competition here
NNMX vs POSC Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, POSC has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while POSC trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas POSC's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to POSC's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to POSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check POSC's competition here
NNMX vs IPDQF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, IPDQF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while IPDQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IPDQF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to IPDQF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and IPDQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPDQF's competition here
NNMX vs MKEAF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, MKEAF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while MKEAF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MKEAF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MKEAF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and MKEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKEAF's competition here
NNMX vs GTHP Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, GTHP has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while GTHP trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTHP's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to GTHP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to GTHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check GTHP's competition here
NNMX vs KBBTF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, KBBTF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while KBBTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KBBTF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to KBBTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and KBBTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBBTF's competition here
NNMX vs PYNKF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, PYNKF has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while PYNKF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PYNKF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to PYNKF's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to PYNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check PYNKF's competition here
NNMX vs EMITF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, EMITF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while EMITF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EMITF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to EMITF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and EMITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMITF's competition here
NNMX vs DIZTF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, DIZTF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while DIZTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DIZTF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to DIZTF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to DIZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check DIZTF's competition here
NNMX vs ASAPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ASAPF has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ASAPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASAPF's P/E ratio is -20.94. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ASAPF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to ASAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check ASAPF's competition here
NNMX vs TMDIF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, TMDIF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while TMDIF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TMDIF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to TMDIF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to TMDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check TMDIF's competition here
NNMX vs VPTDF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, VPTDF has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while VPTDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VPTDF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VPTDF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to VPTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check VPTDF's competition here
NNMX vs ATBPF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ATBPF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ATBPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATBPF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ATBPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to ATBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check ATBPF's competition here
NNMX vs LXXGF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, LXXGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while LXXGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LXXGF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to LXXGF's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and LXXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LXXGF's competition here
NNMX vs RMSL Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, RMSL has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while RMSL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RMSL's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RMSL's ROE of -12.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to RMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check RMSL's competition here
NNMX vs ALRTF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ALRTF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ALRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ALRTF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ALRTF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to ALRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check ALRTF's competition here
NNMX vs PLLWF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, PLLWF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while PLLWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLLWF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to PLLWF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to PLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check PLLWF's competition here
NNMX vs PMEDF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, PMEDF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while PMEDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PMEDF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to PMEDF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to PMEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check PMEDF's competition here
NNMX vs BIEL Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, BIEL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while BIEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BIEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to BIEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to BIEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check BIEL's competition here
NNMX vs USAQ Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, USAQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while USAQ trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas USAQ's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to USAQ's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to USAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check USAQ's competition here
NNMX vs MDXHF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, MDXHF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while MDXHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDXHF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to MDXHF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to MDXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check MDXHF's competition here
NNMX vs ADMT Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ADMT has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ADMT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADMT's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ADMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to ADMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check ADMT's competition here
NNMX vs NGMDF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, NGMDF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while NGMDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NGMDF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to NGMDF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to NGMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check NGMDF's competition here
NNMX vs ODYY Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ODYY has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ODYY trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODYY's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ODYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and ODYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODYY's competition here
NNMX vs QLIS Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, QLIS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while QLIS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QLIS's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to QLIS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and QLIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QLIS's competition here
NNMX vs RHNMF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, RHNMF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while RHNMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RHNMF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to RHNMF's ROE of +15.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to RHNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check RHNMF's competition here
NNMX vs CYDX Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, CYDX has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while CYDX trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYDX's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to CYDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and CYDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYDX's competition here
NNMX vs VYCO Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, VYCO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while VYCO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VYCO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VYCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and VYCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYCO's competition here
NNMX vs VANIW Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, VANIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while VANIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VANIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VANIW's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to VANIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check VANIW's competition here
NNMX vs FZMD Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, FZMD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while FZMD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FZMD's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to FZMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to FZMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check FZMD's competition here
NNMX vs TBRIF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, TBRIF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while TBRIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TBRIF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to TBRIF's ROE of +16.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to TBRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check TBRIF's competition here
NNMX vs ESMC Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, ESMC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while ESMC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ESMC's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to ESMC's ROE of -125.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to ESMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check ESMC's competition here
NNMX vs LLBO Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, LLBO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while LLBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LLBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to LLBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to LLBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check LLBO's competition here
NNMX vs VRSEF Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, VRSEF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while VRSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRSEF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to VRSEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to VRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check VRSEF's competition here
NNMX vs KLYG Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, KLYG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while KLYG trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KLYG's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to KLYG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX and KLYG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLYG's competition here
NNMX vs NUMD Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, NUMD has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while NUMD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NUMD's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to NUMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to NUMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check NUMD's competition here
NNMX vs UAHC Comparison February 2026
NNMX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNMX stands at 9.8K. In comparison, UAHC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNMX is priced at $0.00, while UAHC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNMX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UAHC's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, NNMX's ROE is +1.28%, compared to UAHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NNMX is less volatile compared to UAHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNMX.Check UAHC's competition here