Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 308.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while KO trades at $71.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 179.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PEP trades at $130.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 58.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while MNST trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 46.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while KDP trades at $34.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CCEP trades at $90.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 18.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CCHBF trades at $51.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 18.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CCHGY trades at $51.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while EMBVF trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 13.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while ITONF trades at $61.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 12.56B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PRMB trades at $33.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -660.80. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while COKE trades at $1,174.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CELH trades at $35.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 78.93. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BTVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while YKLTY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while YKLTF trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and YKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while COCSF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and COCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while UPCHY trades at $112.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and UPCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FIZZ trades at $43.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PRMW trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and PRMW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and UNPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while AKO-A trades at $19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while AKO-B trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CCOJY trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 126.29. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and CCOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ITOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while AQPW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while COCO trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while KOF trades at $94.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and OSOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FQVTF trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FQVTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while LSDAF trades at $149.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and LSDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 915.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while YNAJF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BAGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.28M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and NJMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 323.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while OTLY trades at $10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 201.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while HAATF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 133.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while ZVIA trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 78.49M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while REED trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to REED's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 40.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while SHOT trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 37.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BRFH trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 27.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while JSDA trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while KGKG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and KGKG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 10.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while KRTL trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and KRTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while MOJO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and MOJO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 4.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FLWBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while DRNK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and DRNK have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.66M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while APRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while HIRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while NTEI trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and NTEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while INKW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while RVBR trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and PLVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FBEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FBEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PURT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while RMHB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864639.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while ALKM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ALKM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 796047.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while ASII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ASII have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 739814.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while HSEEF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509782.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FMBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378382.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while VGID trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 371634.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PDPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and PDPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 348516.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while DNDT trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 262614.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while HFBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 235830.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while WTER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 228374.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while EQLB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199559.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FHBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171816.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while DNAX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and DNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155461.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while GHMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GHMP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and GHMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 119956.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while MLHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 39715.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while TBEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25613.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while NBVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NBVG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22922.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while STZU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22350.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while FGFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FGFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12326.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +11.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BVNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 9262.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BGEM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1861.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while SWRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SWRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and SWRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 1124.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while PPBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PPBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1080.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while HKBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HKBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while MCHA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MCHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and MCHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while BBDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BBDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BBDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 226.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while KRED trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and KRED have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while AQUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AQUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while ABVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ABVG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, GGGRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and GGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, NBEV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while NBEV trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, RMIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while RMIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.

NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 56.01B. In comparison, CLCL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.98, while CLCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.20, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.