Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.
Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. NNFSF Peers
See (NNFSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNFSF | $4.84 | N/A | 54.4B | 32.27 | $0.15 | +2.18% |
| CCHGY | $52.77 | -0.43% | 19.2B | 20.69 | $2.55 | +2.13% |
| CCHBF | $52.74 | +2.00% | 19.2B | 20.68 | $2.55 | +2.12% |
| EMBVF | $10.68 | -0.24% | 18.4B | 15.94 | $0.67 | +1.17% |
| ITONF | $61.41 | N/A | 13.5B | 87.73 | $0.70 | +0.30% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | N/A | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.76% |
| YKLTF | $20.32 | N/A | 6.1B | 19.35 | $1.05 | +1.11% |
| YKLTY | $9.99 | -0.99% | 6B | 19.21 | $0.52 | +0.75% |
| COCSF | $9.15 | -8.16% | 4.6B | 15.78 | $0.58 | +3.35% |
| BTVCF | $16.40 | +15.09% | 4.1B | 26.89 | $0.61 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
NNFSF vs CCHGY Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while CCHGY trades at $52.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs CCHBF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while CCHBF trades at $52.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs EMBVF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while EMBVF trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs ITONF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs BTVCY Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BTVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs YKLTF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while YKLTF trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs YKLTY Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while YKLTY trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs COCSF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while COCSF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs BTVCF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs UNPSF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and UNPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs CCOJY Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while CCOJY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 121.18. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and CCOJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs YNAJF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while YNAJF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs CCOJF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and CCOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs ITOEF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ITOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs AQPW Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while AQPW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs OSOPF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and OSOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs FQVTF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while FQVTF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs LSDAF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while LSDAF trades at $160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs BAGFF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BAGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs NJMVF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and NJMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs HAATF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while HAATF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs UPCHY Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while UPCHY trades at $119.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs CHFHY Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs PDPG Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs JSDA Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while JSDA trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs MOJO Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while MOJO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs KRTL Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while KRTL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and KRTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs HFBG Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs DRNK Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs RVBR Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while RVBR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs APRU Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs HIRU Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs FLWBF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while FLWBF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs NTEI Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while NTEI trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and NTEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs INKW Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs PLVFF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and PLVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs PURT Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs RMHB Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and RMHB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs FBEC Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FBEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs ASII Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 663.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs FMBV Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs HSEEF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 410.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and HSEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs VGID Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and VGID have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs KGKG Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs FHBC Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FHBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs EQLB Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 185.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs DNAX Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and DNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs GHMP Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and GHMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs MLHC Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs DNDT Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 119.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while DNDT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and DNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs NBVG Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs STZU Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs KRED Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and KRED have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs PPBV Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs FGFT Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and FGFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs BGEM Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs BVNNF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BVNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs ALKM Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ALKM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs TBEV Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and TBEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs SWRI Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and SWRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs HKBV Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs MCHA Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and MCHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs BBDA Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and BBDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs AQUI Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs ABVG Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and ABVG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs RMIL Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.
NNFSF vs GGGRF Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF and GGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NNFSF vs CLCL Comparison
NNFSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNFSF stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NNFSF is priced at $4.84, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNFSF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.27, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNFSF's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNFSF is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNFSF.