99 Acquisition Group Inc. Class A Common Stock
99 Acquisition Group Inc. Class A Common Stock NNAG Peers
See (NNAG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNAG | $10.55 | -0.19% | 132.7M | 95.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| CCIV | $24.25 | +5.90% | 44.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PSACU | $17.08 | +0.35% | 12B | -108.79 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| RTPY | $9.91 | -0.30% | 11.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LVRAW | $0.04 | N/A | 11.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CMLFU | $13.00 | -4.55% | 10.3B | -1444.44 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PSAC | $13.78 | -0.36% | 9.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GRSVU | $11.39 | +3.36% | 6.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APSG | $7.39 | N/A | 6.3B | 36.95 | $0.20 | N/A |
| RTP | $10.03 | -4.48% | 6.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NNAG vs CCIV Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CCIV has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CCIV trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CCIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCIV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CCIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs PSACU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, PSACU has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while PSACU trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas PSACU's P/E ratio is -108.79. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSACU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to PSACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs RTPY Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, RTPY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while RTPY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas RTPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTPY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to RTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs LVRAW Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, LVRAW has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while LVRAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas LVRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LVRAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to LVRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CMLFU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CMLFU has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CMLFU trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CMLFU's P/E ratio is -1444.44. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMLFU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CMLFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs PSAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, PSAC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while PSAC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas PSAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSAC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to PSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GRSVU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GRSVU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GRSVU trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GRSVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRSVU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to GRSVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs APSG Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, APSG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while APSG trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas APSG's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to APSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs RTP Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, RTP has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while RTP trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas RTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTP's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to RTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DGNR Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DGNR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DGNR trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DGNR's P/E ratio is -308.67. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DGNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs VTIQ Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, VTIQ has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while VTIQ trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas VTIQ's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTIQ's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to VTIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs VTIQU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, VTIQU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while VTIQU trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas VTIQU's P/E ratio is 100.60. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTIQU's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to VTIQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs VACQ Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, VACQ has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while VACQ trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas VACQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VACQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to VACQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SVFC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SVFC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SVFC trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SVFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVFC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SVFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs VGAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, VGAC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while VGAC trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas VGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VGAC's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to VGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CMLT Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CMLT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CMLT trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CMLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMLT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CMLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GHVI Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GHVI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GHVI trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GHVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GHVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs KVSB Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, KVSB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while KVSB trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas KVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KVSB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to KVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FTOCU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FTOCU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FTOCU trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FTOCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FTOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs THCBU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, THCBU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while THCBU trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas THCBU's P/E ratio is -101.87. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THCBU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to THCBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CLII Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CLII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CLII trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLII's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GRNV Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GRNV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GRNV trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GRNV's P/E ratio is -59.68. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRNV's ROE of -101981.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FRX Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FRX trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HOLUU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HOLUU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HOLUU trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HOLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOLUU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to HOLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SSPK Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SSPK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SSPK trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SSPK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSPK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SSPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FCACU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FCACU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FCACU trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FCACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCACU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FCACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CFVI Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CFVI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CFVI trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CFVI's P/E ratio is -18.55. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFVI's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CFVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HOL Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HOL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HOL trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to HOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SYM Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SYM trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -371.75. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs THCB Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, THCB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while THCB trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas THCB's P/E ratio is -81.30. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THCB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to THCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SOAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SOAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SOAC trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SOAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SOAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FUSE Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FUSE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FUSE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FUSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUSE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FUSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DCRBU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DCRBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DCRBU trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DCRBU's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCRBU's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DCRBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs IVAN Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, IVAN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while IVAN trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas IVAN's P/E ratio is -698.18. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IVAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to IVAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GWAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GWAC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GWAC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs LCYAU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, LCYAU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while LCYAU trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas LCYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to LCYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs APXTU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, APXTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while APXTU trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas APXTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APXTU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to APXTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FWAA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FWAA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FWAA trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FWAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FWAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FWAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GSAH Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GSAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GSAH trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GSAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GSAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs LCY Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, LCY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while LCY trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas LCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to LCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FORE Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FORE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FORE trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FORE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FORE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs APXT Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, APXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while APXT trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas APXT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APXT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to APXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs RAAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, RAAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while RAAC trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas RAAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to RAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SPNV Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SPNV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SPNV trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SPNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPNV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SPNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DNAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DNAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DNAC trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DNAC's P/E ratio is -37.72. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DNAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FAII Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FAII has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FAII trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FAII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAII's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DMYI Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DMYI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DMYI trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DMYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DMYI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DMYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs LOKB Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, LOKB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while LOKB trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas LOKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOKB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to LOKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs STPC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, STPC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while STPC trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas STPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STPC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to STPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs MUDS Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, MUDS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while MUDS trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas MUDS's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to MUDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs MUDSU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, MUDSU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while MUDSU trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas MUDSU's P/E ratio is -1125.56. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUDSU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to MUDSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs TINV Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, TINV has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while TINV trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas TINV's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TINV's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to TINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CMII Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CMII has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CMII trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DWAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DWAC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DWAC trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DWAC's P/E ratio is -73.46. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWAC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DWACU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DWACU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DWACU trades at $61.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DWACU's P/E ratio is -451.10. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWACU's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DWACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs ATHN Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, ATHN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while ATHN trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas ATHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATHN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to ATHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GMII Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GMII has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GMII trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GMII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SVACU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SVACU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SVACU trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SVACU's P/E ratio is -22.89. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVACU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SVACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs MOTV Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, MOTV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while MOTV trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas MOTV's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOTV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to MOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SVAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SVAC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SVAC trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SVAC's P/E ratio is -32.05. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVAC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CBAH Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CBAH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CBAH trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CBAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to CBAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GXGXU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GXGXU has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GXGXU trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GXGXU's P/E ratio is -23.73. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GXGXU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GXGXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs AONE Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, AONE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while AONE trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas AONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AONE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to AONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SNPR Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SNPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SNPR trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SNPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNPR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SNPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SPFR Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SPFR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SPFR trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SPFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPFR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SPFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DEH Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DEH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DEH trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs ROT Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, ROT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while ROT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas ROT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to ROT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs NGAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, NGAC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while NGAC trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas NGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to NGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs GXGX Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, GXGX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while GXGX trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas GXGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GXGX's ROE of -3.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to GXGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HECCU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HECCU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HECCU trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HECCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HECCU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to HECCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs ATMR Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, ATMR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while ATMR trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas ATMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to ATMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SFTW Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SFTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SFTW trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SFTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SFTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs ENFA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, ENFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while ENFA trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas ENFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENFA's ROE of -825.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to ENFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs ENVI Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, ENVI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while ENVI trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas ENVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to ENVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DFNS Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DFNS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DFNS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DFNS's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DFNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs ACTD Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, ACTD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while ACTD trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas ACTD's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACTD's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to ACTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs VCKA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, VCKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while VCKA trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas VCKA's P/E ratio is 100.11. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VCKA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to VCKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs THMA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, THMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while THMA trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas THMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to THMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs LNFA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, LNFA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while LNFA trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas LNFA's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNFA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to LNFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FTIVU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FTIVU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FTIVU trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FTIVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTIVU's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FTIVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs STWO Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, STWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while STWO trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas STWO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STWO's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to STWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HYACU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HYACU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HYACU trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HYACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HYACU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to HYACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FTIV Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FTIV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FTIV trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FTIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTIV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FTIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs AHAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, AHAC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while AHAC trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas AHAC's P/E ratio is -72.11. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHAC's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to AHAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs AMHC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, AMHC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while AMHC trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas AMHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to AMHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HERAW Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HERAW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HERAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HERAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERAW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to HERAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HERA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HERA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HERA trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HERA's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to HERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FGNA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FGNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FGNA trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FGNA's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FGNA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to FGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs DNAA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, DNAA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while DNAA trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas DNAA's P/E ratio is -54.53. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to DNAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs RACA Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, RACA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while RACA trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas RACA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RACA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to RACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs TREB Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, TREB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while TREB trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas TREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to TREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs PACE Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, PACE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while PACE trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas PACE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PACE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to PACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs HERAU Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, HERAU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while HERAU trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas HERAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERAU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to HERAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs LSAQ Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, LSAQ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while LSAQ trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas LSAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to LSAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SRAC Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SRAC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SRAC trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SRAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRAC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SRAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs FTPAW Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, FTPAW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while FTPAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas FTPAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTPAW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to FTPAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs SBG Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, SBG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while SBG trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas SBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBG's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to SBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs MTAL Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, MTAL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while MTAL trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas MTAL's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTAL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is less volatile compared to MTAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.
NNAG vs CVII-WT Comparison
NNAG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NNAG stands at 132.7M. In comparison, CVII-WT has a market cap of 977.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NNAG is priced at $10.55, while CVII-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NNAG currently has a P/E ratio of 95.91, whereas CVII-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NNAG's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVII-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NNAG is more volatile compared to CVII-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NNAG.