NN Group N.V.

NN.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NN.AS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, CS.PA has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NN.AS is priced at €57.06, while CS.PA trades at €42.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.23, whereas CS.PA's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, NN.AS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CS.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NN.AS and CS.PA have similar daily volatility (1.27).

NN.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NN.AS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GEN.BR has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NN.AS is priced at €57.06, while GEN.BR trades at €19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.23, whereas GEN.BR's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, NN.AS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NN.AS is more volatile compared to GEN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NN.AS.

NN.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NN.AS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ASRNL.AS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NN.AS is priced at €57.06, while ASRNL.AS trades at €56.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.23, whereas ASRNL.AS's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, NN.AS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASRNL.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NN.AS is less volatile compared to ASRNL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NN.AS.

NN.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NN.AS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AGS.BR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NN.AS is priced at €57.06, while AGS.BR trades at €56.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.23, whereas AGS.BR's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, NN.AS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGS.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NN.AS is more volatile compared to AGS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NN.AS.

NN.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NN.AS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AGN.AS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NN.AS is priced at €57.06, while AGN.AS trades at €6.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.23, whereas AGN.AS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, NN.AS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGN.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NN.AS is more volatile compared to AGN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NN.AS.