Net Medical Xpress Solutions, Inc.
Net Medical Xpress Solutions, Inc. (NMXS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NMXS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMXS | $0.00 | +0.00% | 3.8K | -0.01 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PMCUF | $187.41 | -6.72% | 19.6B | 267.73 | $0.70 | +0.14% |
| MTHRY | $7.52 | -2.21% | 10.2B | 37.69 | $0.20 | N/A |
| MTHRF | $13.77 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 34.42 | $0.40 | +1.01% |
| PANHF | $2.10 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 210.00 | $0.01 | +59.37% |
| PIAHY | $4.25 | +0.00% | 2.4B | 141.67 | $0.03 | +116.97% |
| CMPVF | $23.75 | -0.44% | 1.2B | 40.95 | $0.58 | +0.25% |
| CMPUY | $23.00 | -7.26% | 1.2B | 38.98 | $0.59 | N/A |
| CRWRF | $32.40 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 77.14 | $0.42 | +1.17% |
| RSLBF | $28.41 | -7.61% | 973.9M | 48.15 | $0.59 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
NMXS vs PMCUF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PMCUF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PMCUF trades at $187.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PMCUF's P/E ratio is 267.73. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PMCUF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to PMCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check PMCUF's competition here
NMXS vs MTHRY Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MTHRY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MTHRY trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTHRY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MTHRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MTHRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MTHRY's competition here
NMXS vs MTHRF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MTHRF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MTHRF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTHRF's P/E ratio is 34.42. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MTHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MTHRF's competition here
NMXS vs PANHF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PANHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PANHF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PANHF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PANHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to PANHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check PANHF's competition here
NMXS vs PIAHY Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PIAHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PIAHY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PIAHY's P/E ratio is 141.67. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PIAHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to PIAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check PIAHY's competition here
NMXS vs CMPVF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CMPVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CMPVF trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMPVF's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CMPVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and CMPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMPVF's competition here
NMXS vs CMPUY Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CMPUY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CMPUY trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMPUY's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CMPUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and CMPUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMPUY's competition here
NMXS vs CRWRF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CRWRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CRWRF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRWRF's P/E ratio is 77.14. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CRWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CRWRF's competition here
NMXS vs RSLBF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, RSLBF has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while RSLBF trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RSLBF's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to RSLBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to RSLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check RSLBF's competition here
NMXS vs SMSZF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, SMSZF has a market cap of 705.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while SMSZF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMSZF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to SMSZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to SMSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check SMSZF's competition here
NMXS vs VHIBF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, VHIBF has a market cap of 536.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while VHIBF trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VHIBF's P/E ratio is 159.42. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to VHIBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to VHIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check VHIBF's competition here
NMXS vs SUSRF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, SUSRF has a market cap of 533.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while SUSRF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUSRF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to SUSRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and SUSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUSRF's competition here
NMXS vs KSIOF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, KSIOF has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while KSIOF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KSIOF's P/E ratio is 406.60. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to KSIOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to KSIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check KSIOF's competition here
NMXS vs SMDCF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, SMDCF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while SMDCF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMDCF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to SMDCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and SMDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMDCF's competition here
NMXS vs DLHTF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, DLHTF has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while DLHTF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DLHTF's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to DLHTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and DLHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLHTF's competition here
NMXS vs COGZF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, COGZF has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while COGZF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COGZF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to COGZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and COGZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COGZF's competition here
NMXS vs VPAHF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, VPAHF has a market cap of 188.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while VPAHF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VPAHF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to VPAHF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and VPAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VPAHF's competition here
NMXS vs BNVIF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, BNVIF has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while BNVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BNVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to BNVIF's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to BNVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check BNVIF's competition here
NMXS vs ACMLF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ACMLF has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ACMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACMLF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ACMLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to ACMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check ACMLF's competition here
NMXS vs ONVVF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ONVVF has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ONVVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ONVVF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ONVVF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to ONVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check ONVVF's competition here
NMXS vs CSAMF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CSAMF has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CSAMF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSAMF's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CSAMF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and CSAMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSAMF's competition here
NMXS vs RQHTF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, RQHTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while RQHTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RQHTF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to RQHTF's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and RQHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RQHTF's competition here
NMXS vs MDPEF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MDPEF has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MDPEF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDPEF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MDPEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MDPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MDPEF's competition here
NMXS vs HITC Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, HITC has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while HITC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HITC's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to HITC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to HITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check HITC's competition here
NMXS vs TREIF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, TREIF has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while TREIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TREIF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to TREIF's ROE of -9.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to TREIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check TREIF's competition here
NMXS vs RTNXF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, RTNXF has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while RTNXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RTNXF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to RTNXF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to RTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check RTNXF's competition here
NMXS vs VASO Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, VASO has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while VASO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VASO's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to VASO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to VASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check VASO's competition here
NMXS vs HDSLF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, HDSLF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while HDSLF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HDSLF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to HDSLF's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to HDSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check HDSLF's competition here
NMXS vs DGNOF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, DGNOF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while DGNOF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DGNOF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to DGNOF's ROE of +4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to DGNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check DGNOF's competition here
NMXS vs THKKF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, THKKF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while THKKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THKKF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to THKKF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and THKKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THKKF's competition here
NMXS vs MDBIF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MDBIF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MDBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDBIF's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MDBIF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MDBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MDBIF's competition here
NMXS vs MNNDF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MNNDF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MNNDF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MNNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MNNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MNNDF's competition here
NMXS vs PBSV Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PBSV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PBSV trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PBSV's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PBSV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and PBSV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBSV's competition here
NMXS vs UDOCF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, UDOCF has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while UDOCF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UDOCF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to UDOCF's ROE of +6.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to UDOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check UDOCF's competition here
NMXS vs CRVW Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CRVW has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CRVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRVW's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CRVW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CRVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CRVW's competition here
NMXS vs CDXFF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CDXFF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CDXFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CDXFF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CDXFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and CDXFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDXFF's competition here
NMXS vs HSCHF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, HSCHF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while HSCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HSCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to HSCHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and HSCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSCHF's competition here
NMXS vs VYND Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, VYND has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while VYND trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VYND's P/E ratio is -49.99. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to VYND's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and VYND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYND's competition here
NMXS vs HBCNF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, HBCNF has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while HBCNF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HBCNF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to HBCNF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to HBCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check HBCNF's competition here
NMXS vs CMHSF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CMHSF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CMHSF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMHSF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CMHSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and CMHSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMHSF's competition here
NMXS vs SPLTF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, SPLTF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while SPLTF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SPLTF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to SPLTF's ROE of -6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to SPLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check SPLTF's competition here
NMXS vs EMOR Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, EMOR has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while EMOR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to EMOR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to EMOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check EMOR's competition here
NMXS vs CRBKF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CRBKF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CRBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRBKF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CRBKF's ROE of +68.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and CRBKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRBKF's competition here
NMXS vs DOCRF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, DOCRF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while DOCRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DOCRF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to DOCRF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and DOCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DOCRF's competition here
NMXS vs CMPD Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CMPD has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CMPD trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMPD's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CMPD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CMPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CMPD's competition here
NMXS vs AIMLF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, AIMLF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while AIMLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AIMLF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to AIMLF's ROE of -11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to AIMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check AIMLF's competition here
NMXS vs CNONF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CNONF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CNONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNONF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CNONF's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CNONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CNONF's competition here
NMXS vs RYAHF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, RYAHF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while RYAHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RYAHF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to RYAHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and RYAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYAHF's competition here
NMXS vs IQAIF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, IQAIF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while IQAIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IQAIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to IQAIF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to IQAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check IQAIF's competition here
NMXS vs CSOC Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CSOC has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CSOC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSOC's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CSOC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CSOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CSOC's competition here
NMXS vs CBDS Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CBDS has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CBDS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBDS's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CBDS's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CBDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CBDS's competition here
NMXS vs EBYH Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, EBYH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while EBYH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EBYH's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to EBYH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and EBYH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBYH's competition here
NMXS vs MITI Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MITI has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MITI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MITI's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MITI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MITI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MITI's competition here
NMXS vs DTRK Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, DTRK has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while DTRK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DTRK's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to DTRK's ROE of -9.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to DTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check DTRK's competition here
NMXS vs CTVEF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CTVEF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CTVEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTVEF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CTVEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CTVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CTVEF's competition here
NMXS vs PPJE Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PPJE has a market cap of 920.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PPJE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PPJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PPJE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and PPJE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPJE's competition here
NMXS vs MDXL Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MDXL has a market cap of 801K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MDXL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDXL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MDXL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MDXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MDXL's competition here
NMXS vs LVCE Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, LVCE has a market cap of 782.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while LVCE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LVCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to LVCE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and LVCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LVCE's competition here
NMXS vs EKGGF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, EKGGF has a market cap of 772.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while EKGGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EKGGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to EKGGF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to EKGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check EKGGF's competition here
NMXS vs EVAHF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, EVAHF has a market cap of 685.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while EVAHF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVAHF's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to EVAHF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to EVAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check EVAHF's competition here
NMXS vs NEWUF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, NEWUF has a market cap of 625.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while NEWUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEWUF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to NEWUF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and NEWUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEWUF's competition here
NMXS vs MDNWF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MDNWF has a market cap of 517.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MDNWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDNWF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MDNWF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to MDNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check MDNWF's competition here
NMXS vs MDRM Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MDRM has a market cap of 484.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MDRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDRM's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MDRM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and MDRM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDRM's competition here
NMXS vs NDATF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, NDATF has a market cap of 450.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while NDATF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NDATF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to NDATF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and NDATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDATF's competition here
NMXS vs ACHKF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ACHKF has a market cap of 377.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ACHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACHKF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ACHKF's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and ACHKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACHKF's competition here
NMXS vs TSTTF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, TSTTF has a market cap of 332.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while TSTTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TSTTF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to TSTTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to TSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check TSTTF's competition here
NMXS vs NHIQ Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, NHIQ has a market cap of 329.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while NHIQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NHIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to NHIQ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to NHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check NHIQ's competition here
NMXS vs LFCOF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, LFCOF has a market cap of 282K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while LFCOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LFCOF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to LFCOF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to LFCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check LFCOF's competition here
NMXS vs EWLL Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, EWLL has a market cap of 185.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while EWLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to EWLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to EWLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check EWLL's competition here
NMXS vs DSOL Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, DSOL has a market cap of 177.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while DSOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DSOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to DSOL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and DSOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSOL's competition here
NMXS vs ALDNF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ALDNF has a market cap of 160.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ALDNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALDNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ALDNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and ALDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALDNF's competition here
NMXS vs USPS Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, USPS has a market cap of 158.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while USPS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas USPS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to USPS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to USPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check USPS's competition here
NMXS vs EMYSF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, EMYSF has a market cap of 151.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while EMYSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMYSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to EMYSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to EMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check EMYSF's competition here
NMXS vs PASO Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PASO has a market cap of 74.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PASO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PASO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PASO's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and PASO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PASO's competition here
NMXS vs REFG Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, REFG has a market cap of 60.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while REFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REFG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to REFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and REFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REFG's competition here
NMXS vs HDVY Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, HDVY has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while HDVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HDVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to HDVY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and HDVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDVY's competition here
NMXS vs RVRC Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, RVRC has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while RVRC trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RVRC's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to RVRC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and RVRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVRC's competition here
NMXS vs IGRW Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, IGRW has a market cap of 39.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while IGRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to IGRW's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to IGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check IGRW's competition here
NMXS vs WMGR Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, WMGR has a market cap of 36.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while WMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to WMGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and WMGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WMGR's competition here
NMXS vs SSYNF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, SSYNF has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while SSYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSYNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to SSYNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and SSYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSYNF's competition here
NMXS vs SOFE Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, SOFE has a market cap of 31K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while SOFE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOFE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to SOFE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and SOFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOFE's competition here
NMXS vs TTBLF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, TTBLF has a market cap of 26.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while TTBLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTBLF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to TTBLF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to TTBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check TTBLF's competition here
NMXS vs NHEL Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, NHEL has a market cap of 16.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while NHEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NHEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to NHEL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and NHEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHEL's competition here
NMXS vs FDBH Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, FDBH has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while FDBH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FDBH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to FDBH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and FDBH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDBH's competition here
NMXS vs ORHB Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ORHB has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ORHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ORHB's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and ORHB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORHB's competition here
NMXS vs HLTT Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, HLTT has a market cap of 10.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while HLTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to HLTT's ROE of +1789941.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and HLTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTT's competition here
NMXS vs CGNSF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, CGNSF has a market cap of 9K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while CGNSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to CGNSF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to CGNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check CGNSF's competition here
NMXS vs MOSTQ Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, MOSTQ has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while MOSTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MOSTQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to MOSTQ's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and MOSTQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MOSTQ's competition here
NMXS vs ACNV Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ACNV has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ACNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ACNV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and ACNV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACNV's competition here
NMXS vs AHGIF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, AHGIF has a market cap of 7.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while AHGIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AHGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to AHGIF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to AHGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check AHGIF's competition here
NMXS vs ICCO Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ICCO has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ICCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ICCO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ICCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to ICCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check ICCO's competition here
NMXS vs BBLNF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, BBLNF has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while BBLNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BBLNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to BBLNF's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and BBLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBLNF's competition here
NMXS vs ETAOF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, ETAOF has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while ETAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ETAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to ETAOF's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and ETAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ETAOF's competition here
NMXS vs PCYS Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, PCYS has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while PCYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to PCYS's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to PCYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check PCYS's competition here
NMXS vs OLMM Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, OLMM has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while OLMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OLMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to OLMM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to OLMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check OLMM's competition here
NMXS vs LGBI Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, LGBI has a market cap of 50. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while LGBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to LGBI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to LGBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check LGBI's competition here
NMXS vs APYI Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, APYI has a market cap of 34. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while APYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to APYI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and APYI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APYI's competition here
NMXS vs WTEQF Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, WTEQF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while WTEQF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WTEQF's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to WTEQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS and WTEQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTEQF's competition here
NMXS vs VMCS Comparison August 2025
NMXS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMXS stands at 3.8K. In comparison, VMCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMXS is priced at $0.00, while VMCS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMXS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VMCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMXS's ROE is -2.50%, compared to VMCS's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMXS is less volatile compared to VMCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMXS.Check VMCS's competition here