Nippon Accommodations Fund Inc.
Nippon Accommodations Fund Inc. NIPPF Peers
See (NIPPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
NIPPF vs GMGSF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GMGSF has a market cap of 40.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GMGSF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GMGSF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMGSF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GMGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs VICI Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 33.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while VICI trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs WPC Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 13.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while WPC trades at $61.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs STKAF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, STKAF has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while STKAF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas STKAF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to STKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs MRPRF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MRPRF has a market cap of 7.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MRPRF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MRPRF's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to MRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs EPRT Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while EPRT trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GSEFF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GSEFF has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GSEFF trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GSEFF's P/E ratio is 78.03. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSEFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and GSEFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs GPTGF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GPTGF has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GPTGF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GPTGF's P/E ratio is -45.71. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPTGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and GPTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs SRC Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs LDSCY Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, LDSCY has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while LDSCY trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas LDSCY's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LDSCY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to LDSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs LSGOF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, LSGOF has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while LSGOF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas LSGOF's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSGOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to LSGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs UTGPF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, UTGPF has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while UTGPF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas UTGPF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to UTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs BTLCY Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, BTLCY has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while BTLCY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas BTLCY's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTLCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to BTLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs LNSPF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, LNSPF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while LNSPF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas LNSPF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNSPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and LNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs GNL-PD Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GNL-PD trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GNL-PE Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GNL-PE trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs BRLAF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, BRLAF has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while BRLAF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas BRLAF's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to BRLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs FBASF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, FBASF has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while FBASF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas FBASF's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FBASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and FBASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs GNL-PB Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GNL-PB trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -156.99. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs DEXSF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, DEXSF has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while DEXSF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas DEXSF's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEXSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to DEXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CTOUF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CTOUF has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CTOUF trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CTOUF's P/E ratio is 235.63. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTOUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CTOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs DBRG-PH Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while DBRG-PH trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -30.02. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs DBRG-PI Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while DBRG-PI trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -29.85. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs JPRRF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, JPRRF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while JPRRF trades at $3,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas JPRRF's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JPRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and JPRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs DBRG-PJ Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while DBRG-PJ trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SRC-PA Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AFINP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AFINO Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CFMOF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CFMOF has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CFMOF trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CFMOF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFMOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and CFMOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs UUICF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, UUICF has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while UUICF trades at $998.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas UUICF's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UUICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to UUICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs BNL Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while BNL trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs PSB-PY Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs RTLPO Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs RTLPP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SURVF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SURVF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SURVF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SURVF's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SURVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SURVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GWWTF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GWWTF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GWWTF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GWWTF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and GWWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs ATTRF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, ATTRF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while ATTRF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas ATTRF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and ATTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs UE Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while UE trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs ATVXF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, ATVXF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while ATVXF trades at $2,746.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas ATVXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATVXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and ATVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs CROMF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CROMF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CROMF trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CROMF's P/E ratio is -521.00. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CROMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and CROMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs HRUFF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, HRUFF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while HRUFF trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas HRUFF's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRUFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and HRUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs GNL Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GNL trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GNL-PA Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GNL-PA trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -164.12. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CDMGF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CDMGF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CDMGF trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CDMGF's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDMGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and CDMGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs SHABF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SHABF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SHABF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SHABF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHABF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and SHABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs DBRG Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while DBRG trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs XIORF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, XIORF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while XIORF trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas XIORF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XIORF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to XIORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CLNY Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLNY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CLNC Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs ALEX Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while ALEX trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs ESRT Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while ESRT trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CHLWF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CHLWF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CHLWF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CHLWF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHLWF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CHLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AFIN Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AAT Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AAT trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs TKURF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, TKURF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while TKURF trades at $1,176.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas TKURF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TKURF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to TKURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SAFE Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SAFE trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs RTL Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AOTUF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AOTUF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AOTUF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AOTUF's P/E ratio is -66.06. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOTUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and AOTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs RETDF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, RETDF has a market cap of 944.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while RETDF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas RETDF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RETDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to RETDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs KWIPF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, KWIPF has a market cap of 796.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while KWIPF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas KWIPF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KWIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to KWIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs STAR-PG Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs STAR-PI Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs STAR-PD Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs LAREF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, LAREF has a market cap of 705.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while LAREF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas LAREF's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAREF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to LAREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AHH Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 699.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AHH trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs AHH-PA Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 694.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AHH-PA trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 91.32. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs BRSP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 687.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while BRSP trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs STAR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.56M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SHTRF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SHTRF has a market cap of 656.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SHTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SHTRF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and SHTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs GOODN Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 655.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GOODN trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -655.55. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GOODO Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 654.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GOODO trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 698.62. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GOOD Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 644.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GOOD trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 52.19. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs YUXXF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, YUXXF has a market cap of 643.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while YUXXF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas YUXXF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YUXXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to YUXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CTO-PA Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 594.10M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CTO-PA trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CTO Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 593.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CTO trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs IGPYF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, IGPYF has a market cap of 586.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while IGPYF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas IGPYF's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IGPYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and IGPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs OLP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 525.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while OLP trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs ARESF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, ARESF has a market cap of 522.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while ARESF trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas ARESF's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARESF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to ARESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs PKST Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 417.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PKST trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -37.88. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs IMMQF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, IMMQF has a market cap of 381.78M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while IMMQF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas IMMQF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMMQF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and IMMQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs MGRUF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MGRUF has a market cap of 253.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MGRUF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MGRUF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGRUF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and MGRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs PREUF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PREUF has a market cap of 250.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PREUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PREUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PREUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and PREUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs MDV-PA Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 248.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MDV-PA trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs FVR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 219.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while FVR trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs BTBIF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, BTBIF has a market cap of 216.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while BTBIF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas BTBIF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and BTBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs FRMUF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, FRMUF has a market cap of 161.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while FRMUF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas FRMUF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRMUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to FRMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs MDV Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 157.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MDV trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is 62.36. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs FREVS Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, FREVS has a market cap of 126.64M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while FREVS trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas FREVS's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FREVS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and FREVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs CNNRF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CNNRF has a market cap of 80.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CNNRF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CNNRF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CNNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs HHDS Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, HHDS has a market cap of 65.19M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while HHDS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas HHDS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HHDS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to HHDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs DDHRF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, DDHRF has a market cap of 37.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while DDHRF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas DDHRF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DDHRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to DDHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs MDRR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 20.30M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MDRR trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is 594.00. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and MDRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs MKZR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 19.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MKZR trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs MDRRP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SQFTP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SQFTP trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -25.78. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SQFT Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 9.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SQFT trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GIPR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 8.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GIPR trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs SQFTW Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 7.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while SQFTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CORR-PA Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs CORR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GIPRW Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 979774.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GIPRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GADS Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GADS has a market cap of 73071.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GADS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GADS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GADS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs PDNLB Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PDNLB has a market cap of 13800.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PDNLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PDNLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDNLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and PDNLB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs AQQSQ Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, AQQSQ has a market cap of 370.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while AQQSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas AQQSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AQQSQ's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to AQQSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs STOR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, STOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STOR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs PSB Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PSB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs ABPPF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, ABPPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while ABPPF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas ABPPF's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABPPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and ABPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs PSB-PZ Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PSB-PZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs VER Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, VER comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs PSB-PX Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, PSB-PX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs GOODM Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, GOODM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs FSPR Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, FSPR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF and FSPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPPF vs VER-PF Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, VER-PF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs MGP Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, MGP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
NIPPF vs APTS Comparison
NIPPF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPPF stands at 11.59B. In comparison, APTS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NIPPF is priced at $4,603.29, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPPF currently has a P/E ratio of 162.32, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPPF is less volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPPF.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGSF | $20.00 | +1.01% | 40.62B | 66.67 | $0.30 | +0.96% |
VICI | $31.89 | +0.63% | 33.70B | 12.76 | $2.50 | +5.36% |
WPC | $61.55 | -0.23% | 13.48B | 31.73 | $1.94 | +5.71% |
NIPPF | $4,603.29 | N/A | 11.59B | 162.32 | $28.36 | +0.67% |
STKAF | $3.28 | +2.34% | 7.84B | 27.29 | $0.12 | +4.89% |
MRPRF | $12.54 | +13.48% | 7.05B | 19.90 | $0.63 | +2.91% |
EPRT | $31.96 | -0.09% | 6.31B | 27.79 | $1.15 | +3.66% |
GSEFF | $55.40 | N/A | 6.14B | 78.03 | $0.71 | +6.33% |
GPTGF | $3.20 | N/A | 6.13B | -45.71 | -$0.07 | +4.82% |
SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.08B | 24.42 | $1.76 | N/A |