NEC Corporation
NEC Corporation NIPNF Peers
See (NIPNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIPNF | $28.14 | +0.11% | 37.5B | 30.92 | $0.91 | +0.66% |
| FJTSY | $23.29 | -2.63% | 41.9B | 29.48 | $0.79 | +0.24% |
| FJTSF | $21.98 | -12.95% | 39.1B | 27.82 | $0.79 | +0.87% |
| NTDTY | $27.53 | +2.21% | 38.6B | 39.32 | $0.70 | N/A |
| NTTDF | $24.82 | N/A | 34.8B | 35.46 | $0.70 | +0.36% |
| CAPMF | $164.80 | -4.10% | 28B | 15.42 | $10.69 | +2.34% |
| CGEMY | $32.56 | -3.96% | 27.7B | 14.93 | $2.18 | +2.29% |
| NURAF | $41.97 | +1.75% | 24B | 36.18 | $1.16 | +1.03% |
| NRILY | $39.91 | -1.94% | 23.1B | 35.01 | $1.14 | +0.33% |
| WPLCF | $14.28 | -1.07% | 14.6B | 26.44 | $0.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NIPNF vs FJTSY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while FJTSY trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs FJTSF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while FJTSF trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NTDTY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NTDTY trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NTTDF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NTTDF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CAPMF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CAPMF trades at $164.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CGEMY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CGEMY trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NURAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NURAF trades at $41.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 36.18. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NRILY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NRILY trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs WPLCF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while WPLCF trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs WIZEY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while WIZEY trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ISMAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ISMAF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs TISNF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while TISNF trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs RPYTF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs BECTY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while BECTY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DUSXF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs BHTLF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CTLPP Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CTLPP trades at $59.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1991.67. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SPSAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SPSAF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SPSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs TSYHF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while TSYHF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs TSYHY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while TSYHY trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ISMAY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ISMAY trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NWITY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NWKLF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and NWKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs NSSXF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SLNTY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SLNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs NTCYF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and NTCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs NONEY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and NONEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs NDTAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NDTAF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SESPF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SESPF trades at $121.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NCRRP Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ATEAY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ATEAY trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and ATEAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs HLTEF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while HLTEF trades at $71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DLGEF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DLGEF trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CFTLF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CFTLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and CFTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs ATAZF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and ATAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CRAYF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CRAYF trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CCCMF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DTSOF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DTSOF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and DTSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs KSUEF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and KSUEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs KAHTY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and KAHTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs NGRRF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 840.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NGRRF trades at $64.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ADSGF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and ADSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CTSDF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs TRCLF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and TRCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs AEXAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while AEXAF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and AEXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs FDRVF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -25.70. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DTATF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DTATF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and DTATF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs DCHIF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 587.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DCHIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and DCHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs GBDMF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and GBDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CMTUF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DTTLY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 404.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DTTLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and DTTLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CEJOF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs AEXAY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 368.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while AEXAY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and AEXAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs FDDMF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while FDDMF trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and FDDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs SLUNF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SVPLF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SVPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs EMCHF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while EMCHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and EMCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CSYJF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CSYJF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CSYJY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs APMRF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while APMRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SSCC Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SSCC trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ITFRF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ALYAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ALYAF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is 185.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs APPEF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while APPEF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs APXYY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while APXYY trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and APXYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs ALVNF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and ALVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs FCCN Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while FCCN trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs ULPRF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs QUISF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and QUISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs DCHIY Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DCHIY trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs QSCGF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs GSDT Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while GSDT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and GSDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs KDCXF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and KDCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs EAXR Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while EAXR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs HLEO Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while HLEO trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs CXGEF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CXGEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SEBFF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SEBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CNGFF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CNGFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SNELF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SNELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs BNXAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while BNXAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SPOFF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SPOFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SPOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CPIHF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CPIHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs MLBEF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while MLBEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs KTHGF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs WYLDF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs POSAF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while POSAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs XTMIF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs VSSSF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while VSSSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs KNRLF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while KNRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DVRNF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs DCSX Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while DCSX trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and DCSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs BRQSF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while BRQSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs FUUN Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and FUUN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs GTCH Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while GTCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs SKTCF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SKTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs SNOIF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SNOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs SEAV Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while SEAV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF and SEAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPNF vs CRCW Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.
NIPNF vs NOSUF Comparison
NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 37.5B. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $28.14, while NOSUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.