NEC Corporation

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while FJTSY trades at $22.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NTDTY trades at $28.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 40.55. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while FJTSF trades at $22.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NTTDF trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CGEMY trades at $33.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CAPMF trades at $167.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NURAF trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NRILY trades at $39.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while WPLCF trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while WIZEY trades at $14.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ISMAF trades at $41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while TISNF trades at $29.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DTATF trades at $43.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while BECTY trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while TSYHY trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while TSYHF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SPSAF trades at $206.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ISMAY trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CTLPP trades at $40.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1341.67. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NWITY trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NDTAF trades at $31.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ATEAY trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SESPF trades at $61.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 890M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NGRRF trades at $68.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CTSDF has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CTSDF trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CTSDF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CTSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 794.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while AEXAF trades at $41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -30.98. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 494.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while AEXAY trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 343.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 261.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while EMCHF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SSCC trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while APMRF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while FCCN trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -61.40. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 201.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while APPEF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while APXYY trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while ALYAF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -42.33. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while QUISF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DCHIY trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while HLEO trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while GSDT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while EAXR trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SNELF trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while BNXAF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SPOFF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while POSAF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while KNRLF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DRGV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while VSSSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while BRQSF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while FUUN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while DCSX trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while CRCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SFWJ has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SFWJ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SFWJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFWJ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SFWJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while NOSUF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.

NIPNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NIPNF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPNF is priced at $24.85, while SEAV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NIPNF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.31, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NIPNF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPNF is less volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPNF.