NH Foods Ltd.
NH Foods Ltd. NIPMY Peers
See (NIPMY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIPMY | $16.45 | -3.24% | 3.4B | 18.08 | $0.91 | N/A |
| NSRGY | $106.55 | +0.11% | 274.3B | 20.85 | $5.11 | +3.18% |
| NSRGF | $106.14 | -0.51% | 272.9B | 20.81 | $5.10 | +3.43% |
| GPDNF | $86.10 | -0.23% | 55.6B | 24.25 | $3.55 | +2.83% |
| DANOY | $17.07 | -0.02% | 55.1B | 24.04 | $0.71 | +2.75% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 47.3B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| AJINF | $41.50 | N/A | 41.3B | 172.92 | $0.24 | +0.66% |
| ELOAF | $0.01 | +37.50% | 31.2B | 1.10 | $0.01 | N/A |
| AJINY | $24.87 | -0.52% | 24.7B | 103.63 | $0.24 | +1.07% |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | N/A | 20.9B | 12.10 | $2.40 | +2.95% |
Stock Comparison
NIPMY vs NSRGY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 274.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NSRGY trades at $106.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs NSRGF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 272.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NSRGF trades at $106.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NSRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs GPDNF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GPDNF trades at $86.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GPDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs DANOY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while DANOY trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs TUFBY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs AJINF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while AJINF trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 172.92. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and AJINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs ELOAF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELOAF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ELOAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ELOAF's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELOAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to ELOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs AJINY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while AJINY trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs ASBFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and ASBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs ASBFY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ASBFY trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs KRYAF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while KRYAF trades at $113.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and KRYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs KRYAY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while KRYAY trades at $110.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs JBSAY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while JBSAY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs BMBOY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while BMBOY trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and BMBOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs WHGLY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while WHGLY trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs JDEPF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while JDEPF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and JDEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs GRBMF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GRBMF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs ORKLY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ORKLY trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs ORKLF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ORKLF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and ORKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs CIADF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TYCMY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TYCMY trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs KIKOF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while KIKOF trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and KIKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs WHGRF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while WHGRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs TCYMF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TCYMF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and TCYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TTAZF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs KIKOY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while KIKOY trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and KIKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs CIADY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CIADY trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 556.22. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs SAPIF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SAPIF trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and SAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs WWNTF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while WWNTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and WWNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs CFEIY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and CFEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs GCHOY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs MEJHY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while MEJHY trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs SDPNF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs GPAGF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GPAGF trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GPAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TSUKY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TSUKY trades at $68.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs PIFFY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while PIFFY trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and PIFFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs NFPDF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NFPDF trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NFPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs DLLFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs CHFLF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CHFLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and CHFLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs MEJHF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while MEJHF trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs EMLZF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs SMPFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs ARHUF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ARHUF trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs ARZTY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ARZTY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs IOIOF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs NCHEY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NCHEY trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NCHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TSUKF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TSUKF trades at $43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs YMZBY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while YMZBY trades at $216.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and YMZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs PIFMY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while PIFMY trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and PIFMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs NSLYF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NSLYF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NSLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs ACOPF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ACOPF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and ACOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs MRRTY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while MRRTY trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs TATYF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TATYF trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and TATYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs PIFMF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while PIFMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and PIFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs UVRBF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs CRWKF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs UVRBY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and UVRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs NSFMF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NSFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TATYY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TATYY trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 48.02. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and TATYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs FPAFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while FPAFF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and FPAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs FPAFY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while FPAFY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs GLAPF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GLAPF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GLAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs GLAPY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GLAPY trades at $55.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GLAPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs EBRPF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while EBRPF trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to EBRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs CBCFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and CBCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs EBRPY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs PRBZF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while PRBZF trades at $57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and PRBZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs CLBEY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while CLBEY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs SUEZY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SUEZY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -19.84. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs ARZTF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs MLFNF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while MLFNF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and MLFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs NHFOF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NHFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TBLMF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TBLMF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs LYSFY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while LYSFY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and LYSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs FTROF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs PRRFY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while PRRFY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and PRRFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs LYSFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while LYSFF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and LYSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs SUEZF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SUEZF trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and SUEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs SGLJF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs GRPBF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs NISUY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while NISUY trades at $61.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and NISUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs HOFJF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and HOFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs FSRCY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while FSRCY trades at $114.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and FSRCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TBLMY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs AVSFY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and AVSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs TUFUF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while TUFUF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and TUFUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs YNNHF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs PFODF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while PFODF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs FNEVF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and FNEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs HLFGY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs FNEVY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while FNEVY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and FNEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs GBFBF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs AKEJF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while AKEJF trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs HLTFF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and HLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs JWLLF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while JWLLF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and JWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs GNCGF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GNCGF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to GNCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs BKKVF Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BKKVF has a market cap of 995.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while BKKVF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas BKKVF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKKVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY is less volatile compared to BKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIPMY.
NIPMY vs GNCGY Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 945.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while GNCGY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and GNCGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NIPMY vs SENEM Comparison
NIPMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIPMY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SENEM has a market cap of 883.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIPMY is priced at $16.45, while SENEM trades at $58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIPMY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.08, whereas SENEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIPMY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SENEM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIPMY and SENEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).