Nika BioTechnology, Inc.
Nika BioTechnology, Inc. (NIKA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NIKA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKA | $0.35 | -62.80% | 972.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MKGAF | $131.08 | -1.56% | 58.3B | 17.46 | $7.68 | +1.87% |
| MKKGY | $25.35 | -3.74% | 55.6B | 16.62 | $1.54 | +1.95% |
| TKPHF | $31.00 | +1.31% | 48.4B | 53.45 | $0.58 | +4.28% |
| IPSEY | $34.09 | +0.96% | 45.1B | 21.85 | $1.56 | +0.76% |
| HLNCF | $4.68 | -4.78% | 43.6B | 22.11 | $0.22 | +2.53% |
| SDZNY | $62.05 | -1.16% | 26.9B | 120.21 | $0.52 | +1.16% |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
| TEVJF | $14.32 | +0.00% | 16.4B | -95.47 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| SGIOF | $17.96 | +1.47% | 15.1B | 13.01 | $1.36 | +4.60% |
Stock Comparison
NIKA vs MKGAF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while MKGAF trades at $131.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check MKGAF's competition here
NIKA vs MKKGY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while MKKGY trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check MKKGY's competition here
NIKA vs TKPHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TKPHF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and TKPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKPHF's competition here
NIKA vs IPSEY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while IPSEY trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check IPSEY's competition here
NIKA vs HLNCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HLNCF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HLNCF's competition here
NIKA vs SDZNY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SDZNY trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SDZNY's competition here
NIKA vs ESALY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check ESALY's competition here
NIKA vs TEVJF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TEVJF trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is -95.47. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check TEVJF's competition here
NIKA vs SGIOF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SGIOF trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and SGIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGIOF's competition here
NIKA vs SGIOY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SGIOY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SGIOY's competition here
NIKA vs BIOVF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while BIOVF trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check BIOVF's competition here
NIKA vs SFOSF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SFOSF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and SFOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFOSF's competition here
NIKA vs IPSEF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check IPSEF's competition here
NIKA vs ESALF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ESALF trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and ESALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESALF's competition here
NIKA vs ESAIY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ESAIY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check ESAIY's competition here
NIKA vs GZPHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while GZPHF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check GZPHF's competition here
NIKA vs HKMPF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HKMPF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HKMPF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HKMPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and HKMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKMPF's competition here
NIKA vs HKMPY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HKMPY trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HKMPY's competition here
NIKA vs SGFEF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SGFEF trades at $114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SGFEF's competition here
NIKA vs WIBFF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, WIBFF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while WIBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIBFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIBFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to WIBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check WIBFF's competition here
NIKA vs HLUBF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HLUBF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HLUBF's competition here
NIKA vs HLBBF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HLBBF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HLBBF's competition here
NIKA vs LVZPF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LVZPF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LVZPF's competition here
NIKA vs SMDPY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SMDPY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SMDPY's competition here
NIKA vs DNPUF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while DNPUF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check DNPUF's competition here
NIKA vs CHSYF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CHSYF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CHSYF's competition here
NIKA vs ULIHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ULIHF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check ULIHF's competition here
NIKA vs APNHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while APNHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check APNHF's competition here
NIKA vs INVVY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and INVVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INVVY's competition here
NIKA vs IZQVF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and IZQVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IZQVF's competition here
NIKA vs LBTSF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LBTSF trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 121.45. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LBTSF's competition here
NIKA vs HMDCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HMDCF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HMDCF's competition here
NIKA vs HYPMY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HYPMY trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HYPMY's competition here
NIKA vs APNHY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while APNHY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APNHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check APNHY's competition here
NIKA vs THCBF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, THCBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while THCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THCBF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to THCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check THCBF's competition here
NIKA vs CURLF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CURLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CURLF's competition here
NIKA vs CASBF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CASBF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is -69.56. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and CASBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CASBF's competition here
NIKA vs DMPHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check DMPHF's competition here
NIKA vs HTSUF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HTSUF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and HTSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTSUF's competition here
NIKA vs LJUIF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LJUIF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LJUIF's competition here
NIKA vs GTBIF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while GTBIF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 80.09. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check GTBIF's competition here
NIKA vs ARSUF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ARSUF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and ARSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARSUF's competition here
NIKA vs TSMRF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TSMRF trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and TSMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSMRF's competition here
NIKA vs NPNKF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while NPNKF trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check NPNKF's competition here
NIKA vs TCNNF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TCNNF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check TCNNF's competition here
NIKA vs MITPF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check MITPF's competition here
NIKA vs KARBF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and KARBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KARBF's competition here
NIKA vs NPPNY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while NPPNY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check NPPNY's competition here
NIKA vs SHEZF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SHEZF's competition here
NIKA vs CHIZF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CHIZF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and CHIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHIZF's competition here
NIKA vs SWGHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and SWGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWGHF's competition here
NIKA vs KSPHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while KSPHF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and KSPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSPHF's competition here
NIKA vs EVOTF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while EVOTF trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and EVOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVOTF's competition here
NIKA vs GNMLF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while GNMLF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and GNMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNMLF's competition here
NIKA vs KKPCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while KKPCF trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check KKPCF's competition here
NIKA vs BIOGY Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 961M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while BIOGY trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check BIOGY's competition here
NIKA vs SHPHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 924.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SHPHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SHPHF's competition here
NIKA vs LVTTF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LVTTF has a market cap of 891.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LVTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVTTF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LVTTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LVTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LVTTF's competition here
NIKA vs EVRRF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, EVRRF has a market cap of 887.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while EVRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVRRF's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and EVRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRRF's competition here
NIKA vs NRXCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, NRXCF has a market cap of 842.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while NRXCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRXCF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRXCF's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and NRXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRXCF's competition here
NIKA vs TWAPF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check TWAPF's competition here
NIKA vs CSWYF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CSWYF's competition here
NIKA vs TRXPF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and TRXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRXPF's competition here
NIKA vs SWDCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SWDCF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and SWDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWDCF's competition here
NIKA vs YIHCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and YIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YIHCF's competition here
NIKA vs TRSSF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check TRSSF's competition here
NIKA vs ELTP Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 593M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ELTP trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is -55.37. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELTP's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check ELTP's competition here
NIKA vs AIHLF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 588.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while AIHLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and AIHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIHLF's competition here
NIKA vs VRNOF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while VRNOF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check VRNOF's competition here
NIKA vs GLASF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 564.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while GLASF trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check GLASF's competition here
NIKA vs PKBFF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and PKBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKBFF's competition here
NIKA vs CCHWF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CCHWF's competition here
NIKA vs KHTRF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 467.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while KHTRF trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check KHTRF's competition here
NIKA vs PEXXF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and PEXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXXF's competition here
NIKA vs CRLBF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 449.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CRLBF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CRLBF's competition here
NIKA vs BOIRF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while BOIRF trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check BOIRF's competition here
NIKA vs AGYTF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while AGYTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of -13.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check AGYTF's competition here
NIKA vs HUMDF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 404.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HUMDF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and HUMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUMDF's competition here
NIKA vs CPHRF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CPHRF trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CPHRF's competition here
NIKA vs BHCCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check BHCCF's competition here
NIKA vs BIOIF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, BIOIF has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while BIOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOIF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BIOIF's ROE of -10.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and BIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOIF's competition here
NIKA vs PLNHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check PLNHF's competition here
NIKA vs PHCUF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, PHCUF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while PHCUF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHCUF's P/E ratio is -293.74. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PHCUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to PHCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check PHCUF's competition here
NIKA vs CBWTF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CBWTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check CBWTF's competition here
NIKA vs AAWH Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while AAWH trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAWH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check AAWH's competition here
NIKA vs JUSHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while JUSHF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check JUSHF's competition here
NIKA vs COPHF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check COPHF's competition here
NIKA vs STMH Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, STMH has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while STMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to STMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check STMH's competition here
NIKA vs NWPN Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check NWPN's competition here
NIKA vs LOVFF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LOVFF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LOVFF's competition here
NIKA vs HLTRF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while HLTRF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check HLTRF's competition here
NIKA vs SHIEF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, SHIEF has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while SHIEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIEF's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHIEF's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to SHIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check SHIEF's competition here
NIKA vs LPCUF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LPCUF's competition here
NIKA vs CNVCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of -3.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and CNVCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNVCF's competition here
NIKA vs GRUSF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while GRUSF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check GRUSF's competition here
NIKA vs BIOYF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while BIOYF trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA and BIOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIOYF's competition here
NIKA vs PLNH Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, PLNH has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while PLNH trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLNH's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLNH's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to PLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check PLNH's competition here
NIKA vs LRDSF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, LRDSF has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while LRDSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRDSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LRDSF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to LRDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check LRDSF's competition here
NIKA vs ABSCF Comparison August 2025
NIKA plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIKA stands at 972.9M. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIKA is priced at $0.35, while ABSCF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIKA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, NIKA's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIKA is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIKA.Check ABSCF's competition here