Norsk Hydro ASA

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, CHHQY has a market cap of 123.64B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while CHHQY trades at $13.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas CHHQY's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHHQY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to CHHQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, CHHQF has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while CHHQF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas CHHQF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHHQF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to CHHQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, ALMMF has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while ALMMF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ALMMF's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is less volatile compared to ALMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, ACHHY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while ACHHY trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ACHHY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACHHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to ACHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, NHYKF has a market cap of 11.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while NHYKF trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas NHYKF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NHYKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to NHYKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, AWCMY has a market cap of 10.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while AWCMY trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AWCMY's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWCMY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is less volatile compared to AWCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, AA has a market cap of 6.71B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while AA trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AA's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to AA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, AWCMF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while AWCMF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AWCMF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWCMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to AWCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, CSTM has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while CSTM trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas CSTM's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSTM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to CSTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, CENX has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while CENX trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas CENX's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CENX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to CENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, KALU has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while KALU trades at $67.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas KALU's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KALU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to KALU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, EORBF has a market cap of 91.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while EORBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas EORBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EORBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is less volatile compared to EORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, BXRDF has a market cap of 10.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while BXRDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas BXRDF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BXRDF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to BXRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, AFML has a market cap of 7656.00. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while AFML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AFML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to AFML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, NORNQ has a market cap of 7019.00. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while NORNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas NORNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NORNQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is less volatile compared to NORNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, MNSF has a market cap of 1889.00. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while MNSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas MNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to MNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, ORMTQ has a market cap of 1866.00. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while ORMTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ORMTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORMTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is less volatile compared to ORMTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, ACH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while ACH trades at $9.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ACH's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to ACH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, CHZHF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while CHZHF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas CHZHF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHZHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to CHZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.

NHYDY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NHYDY stands at 10.88B. In comparison, UNRIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NHYDY is priced at $5.51, while UNRIF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NHYDY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas UNRIF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, NHYDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNRIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NHYDY is more volatile compared to UNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NHYDY.